JaylaClark wrote...
I actually think that allowing the Council to die is not only the smart thing to do, but one that at least two-thirds of the Council would accept without question. If the Alliance runs out of ships to take out Sovereign because they lost them defending the Council, then, even if they don't buy the Reaper threat, they'd have to presume that they'd be killed anyway shortly after Sovereign consolidates control over the station.
As I always say, if the alliance fleet didnt concentrate on saving the council, and saved those ships for sovereign, those ships would be then flanked and decimated by the geth fleet as they turn and help their "god". I definitely side with saving the council as the wiser decision, if not for the immediate tactical benefits, then for the long term power stability.
As for the station control, once Shepard had control, Sovereign could just float there and do nothing. An insider was the lynchpin of the entire plan, without it Sovereign was a sitting duck. Its no coincidence that it reanimated Sarens corpse. As long as Shepard was at the command console the reaper invasion was never going to happen. Some people seem to think Sovereign just sitting there on the spire somehow still risked the relay opening.
Modifié par Dinkamus_Littlelog, 21 mai 2010 - 10:31 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





