Ce sujet est fermé
That would be RussianYeled wrote...
Yay! That worked. For some reason my settings had changed to pyccknn (except the n's were backward, uppercase, and there was a tilde over the second one). No idea what language that is.
jlb524 wrote...
It will be here in 12 days.... soon. It seems like we've been waiting for months (well, we have been).
It's just about slightly shorter than forever...
Guest_LesEnfantsTerribles_*
jlb524 wrote...
It will be here in 12 days.... soon. It seems like we've been waiting for months (well, we have been).
I hope you don't lose it by then
WilliamShatner wrote...
Why are BioWare trying to divide their market by releasing a Morrigan DLC on the same day???
Are they trying to get Liara DLC poor sales to say "We told you so. No more Liara!"
Dinkamus_Littlelog wrote...
I cant see any way that melding asari genes on that of a genetically incompatible species would do anything.
Modifié par tonnactus, 25 août 2010 - 10:20 .
WilliamShatner wrote...
Why are BioWare trying to divide their market by releasing a Morrigan DLC on the same day???
Are they trying to get Liara DLC poor sales to say "We told you so. No more Liara!"
Lizardviking wrote...
WilliamShatner wrote...
Why are BioWare trying to divide their market by releasing a Morrigan DLC on the same day???
Are they trying to get Liara DLC poor sales to say "We told you so. No more Liara!"
Now you are just paronoid for the sake of it. Why would Bioware hurt their own sales just to prove a point about some character?
yorkj86 wrote...
If the book is confirming this, though, then this "dev"'s information is a little more believable.
Modifié par jlb524, 25 août 2010 - 10:30 .
Guest_Runescapeguy9_*
People may not want to reload on points for one purchase. It gives more incentive to bundle things into one release as people are lazy.WilliamShatner wrote...
Why are BioWare trying to divide their market by releasing a Morrigan DLC on the same day???
Are they trying to get Liara DLC poor sales to say "We told you so. No more Liara!"
yorkj86 wrote...
I think what confuses people about asari reproduction is the wording of the Codex, regarding the act of melding. "During melding, an asari consciously attunes her nervous system to her partner's, sending and receiving electrical impulses directly through the skin." Knowing this, people don't understand why an asari would need a partner to conceive a child. Because they can't understand (or don't accept why) that asari don't need a partner, it leads them to think that the partner must contribute something during the act.
Guest_yorkj86_*
tonnactus wrote...
Dinkamus_Littlelog wrote...
I cant see any way that melding asari genes on that of a genetically incompatible species would do anything.
Dna is just information. Just imagine asari melding translate some genes of the "father" into the asari dna.
Like an "if when"
clause is possible in more then one program language. So in this way it could be possible to get some inherits from the
"father" through melding. To be honest,i cant see why so many other species would choose the asari as partners anyway if not even the child has something in common with the partner that the partner could be aware of.
The game isnt clear about this.The asari with the krogan means,there is nothing,only radomizing, two other asaris near erinya talk about that the character of one is that way because the father was a batarian.
Could be just something that their science cant answer yet.( so not necessarily a retcon)
Individual.The best characteristics of the father.Nerevar-as wrote...
The Codex is in-universe information, so it is not reliable, same as in DA. Don´t get why you can accept asari can reproduce through mind meld, but not that they take traits from the father species (or should it be individual?).
Guest_yorkj86_*
Nerevar-as wrote...
The Codex is in-universe information, so it is not reliable, same as in DA. Don´t get why you can accept asari can reproduce through mind meld, but not that they take traits from the father species (or should it be individual?).
Modifié par yorkj86, 25 août 2010 - 10:45 .
Shepard + Liara = over 9000 in badassery.tonnactus wrote...
Individual.The best characteristics of the father.Nerevar-as wrote...
The Codex is in-universe information, so it is not reliable, same as in DA. Don´t get why you can accept asari can reproduce through mind meld, but not that they take traits from the father species (or should it be individual?).
yorkj86 wrote...
Nerevar-as wrote...
The Codex is in-universe information, so it is not reliable, same as in DA. Don´t get why you can accept asari can reproduce through mind meld, but not that they take traits from the father species (or should it be individual?).
It seems to conflict with the notion of the process being a randomization of the "mother"'s genes, as the "father"'s genes have no role. The "father"'s presence is necessary for the process to take place, but it doesn't actually contribute anything. It may conflict with what we're told by that one asari on Illium, the one with the krogan suitor.
Also, some people may read "asexual" and run with their interpretation.
yorkj86 wrote...
I didn't read in to it that way at all. I think she she was making an off-color, nearly-racist comment acknowledging the way certain species have personality stereotypes associated with them, such as batarians and aggressiveness. She knew her friend's "father" is a batarian, and her friend is acting like a batarian, so it must be because of genetics (false), and not simply due to how her father raised her, which is far more likely.
jtav wrote...
I gather most Liara fans are primarily Leliana fans, though it's just an impression. I'm an Alistair girl myself.
jtav wrote...
Do we have a file size for LotSB yet?
Modifié par jlb524, 25 août 2010 - 10:49 .
Thats right.When the asari only need another partner,then why its a problem when the "father" is an asari.The genesjlb524 wrote...
Then the whole 'pureblood' stigma is kind of...pointless.
Modifié par tonnactus, 25 août 2010 - 10:55 .
Guest_yorkj86_*
tonnactus wrote...
yorkj86 wrote...
I didn't read in to it that way at all. I think she she was making an off-color, nearly-racist comment acknowledging the way certain species have personality stereotypes associated with them, such as batarians and aggressiveness. She knew her friend's "father" is a batarian, and her friend is acting like a batarian, so it must be because of genetics (false), and not simply due to how her father raised her, which is far more likely.
There are just different oppinions about it and that melding didnt do more then radomizing could be just a wrong
science doctrine.
And raising isnt more important then genes.Its the opposite.
Dinkamus_Littlelog wrote...
Either way, the codex flat out states that there is no real evidence to support the transfer of the "best" traits from the father, or any traits at all. Its simply asari saying this, and since the asari are a very arrogant species (their religion places themselves as sort of "unifiers of the galaxy" simply due to their species method of reproduction) its not surprising.
Modifié par tonnactus, 25 août 2010 - 11:01 .
Retour en haut
