JPfanner wrote...
I think seeing her as needing redemption is quite frankly condescending. She has a goal and needs to kill some people along the way. That's pretty much the modus operandi for getting anything done in the Mass Effect universe. Like I said before, Garrus and Wrex were both pursuing goals that involved people in the way being killed. I don't really want to play the gender card, but honestly it seems like a lot of people just assume a woman can't be killing people without her "falling" or "needing saving".
Perhaps this is true, but even the most Renegade Shepard is fundamentally still saving the galaxy. He/she is never so evil as to stray from THAT road.
Liara is different. Is the Shadow Broker "bad"? No, probably amoral in the sense that the free market isn't "evil" just totally without care for the people it hurts and destroys or as amoral as a bear who eats a human alive out of hunger and instinct. Then does that make her ANY different than the Shadow Broker? If the"major" sin of the Broker is that they worked with the Collectors, is that enough reason to destroy such an organization? I imagine it is bad for the Shadow Broker's business if sentient life was annihilated, so that group may yet come around and be more of an asset to Shepard than an enemy. Liara seems focused on destroying it "for Shepard" and "for Feron", but if both of them survive, what reason truly remains? Personal vindictiveness?
As for saying redemption is condescending, I would imagine many would disagree. Hell, Shepard may need to come to task for what they have done to defeat the Reapers at the end of ME 3. It is also a very powerful thematic element throughout story telling. Would you rather than Liara just be ultimately a good guy, clearly black and white without any sin upon her conscience? We will see soon enough, I am sure, but don't ignore the power of redemption. An entire religion is based on it, by the way

.