At least that's SOMETHING.
Modifié par CanadAvenger, 25 février 2010 - 10:34 .
Modifié par CanadAvenger, 25 février 2010 - 10:34 .
Guest_justinnstuff_*
screwoffreg wrote...
General Stubbs wrote...
Unfortunately, it all comes back to why the hell does Shepard not try and at least comfort her and talk to her about what happened, that is what makes it feel unrealistic.
I agree, it makes perfect sense for her to be traumatized and completely and utterly devestated about what happened. It is also nice that through certain dialogue options, we can still se the caring and loving Liara.
I am assuming the writers knew what they did and are planning to fix it in DLC, they must have seen themselves (as they wrote it) that it makes no sense to have Shepard not care while Liara is suffering.
That is what ticks me off the most. I don't know if it was intentional or just a sloppy oversight but here is a woman Shepard loved and confided in and as she suffers, as HE/SHE suffers (Shepard), there is no option to acknowledge or even offer some comfort. Hell, you could even hug Tali when her father died...but Liara is just left static, a machine to hand out quests and info with little else. I really hope that, even if it sucked, this was done on purpose and not just bad writing.
Sakhalin wrote...
Agreed. I can't wait for GDC for them to announce the new ME2 DLCs, but part of me has a feeling that they will only reveal Kasumi or the Hammerhead thingy. Hopefully they are taking their sweet time with the Liara DLC so when its released, its pure awesomeness.
Yep, this is pretty much how I feel as well. The whole Liara scene in ME2 is just as artifically one sided and static as the Horizon scene with Ashley/Kaiden. So all we can speculate on is the very little they do say and the effectively nothing we're allowed to say back.The BS Police wrote...
I don't really see how she changed as much as everyone else thinks she did. it's not like she never killed anyone else before her and Shepard met. She even made it clear that she has dealt with various Merc groups before the events of ME1 while investigating Prothean ruins.
Raanz wrote...
Sakhalin wrote...
Agreed. I can't wait for GDC for them to announce the new ME2 DLCs, but part of me has a feeling that they will only reveal Kasumi or the Hammerhead thingy. Hopefully they are taking their sweet time with the Liara DLC so when its released, its pure awesomeness.
I've read this thread a bunch, and I see people talking about Liara DLC, hell I even saw it on the wiki (a mention of a rumor), I must have missed something....a tidbit that hints towards DLC specifically with Liara in it? Is it all just wishful thinking or has something been mentioned by BW?
Raanz wrote...
I've read this thread a bunch, and I see people talking about Liara DLC, hell I even saw it on the wiki (a mention of a rumor), I must have missed something....a tidbit that hints towards DLC specifically with Liara in it? Is it all just wishful thinking or has something been mentioned by BW?
Modifié par Dinkamus_Littlelog, 25 février 2010 - 10:54 .
Modifié par screwoffreg, 25 février 2010 - 11:02 .
Guest_LesEnfantsTerribles_*
LesEnfantsTerribles wrote...
Add to that the fact that when Redemption was announced BW said that there would be DLC that would tie-in to events in the comic, I think there's ample evidence Liara DLC is on the way.
MoSa09 wrote...
Sometimes i believe some people get a little Liara blinded and cause her story was bad (i agree), the game is also bad and become pessimistic and disappointed with the game in general.
Modifié par bjdbwea, 25 février 2010 - 11:09 .
T-Kay wrote...
Or the Matriarch Asari that tends the bar on Illium.
This discussion may be off topic, but I'm joining in nonetheless. In ME1 the gameplay sucked. It was far too easy and the mako makes a second playthrough so much less enjoyable. The story was great there is no issue on that. And it is in that fact that BioWare made a mistake only. The second game fixes almost everything that was wrong with the first game. The gameplay experience is improved tenfold. ME2 just focusses more on characters you may or may not care about and the main story is second to them. In fact when I finished ME2 I had the feeling I was only halfway through.screwoffreg wrote...
I don't want to make it seem like I am terribly disappointed with ME 2. I have enjoyed my replays so far, partly due to the fact the classes are so distinct that it really is a different experience each time. Even so, I feel like much more could have been done with the story so far, but I have faith that Bioware's writers are saving up for something great in ME 3. Baldurs Gate conclusion was no slouch, as a matter of fact for being an Expansion it was one of the greatest games of all time.
bjdbwea wrote...
MoSa09 wrote...
Sometimes i believe some people get a little Liara blinded and cause her story was bad (i agree), the game is also bad and become pessimistic and disappointed with the game in general.
No, no, no. No. My disappointment with ME 2 started way earlier than that. After the great beginning, the longer I was playing, the less I liked what I saw. Until the end, which was okay again. I can't name it all again, and it's not exactly the topic here. But I strongly reject the notion that my view of the general game has been influenced by the disappointment with the ME 1 LI treatment.
It's more like this: After already being disappointed - by the way also with most new companions - I was very much looking forward to the meeting with character my Shepard usually had a romance with. We knew they would only play a small role. But I fully expected this at least to be one / the high point in the game, as I really didn't anticipate that BioWare of all sorts would screw something like that up so badly. Bam! They did. It was the absolute low point. But I'm still able to differentiate this from the rest of the game.
Look, I was not suggesting that it's "wrong" if anyone likes the game. It's great that you like it, and many people do. I don't "hate" it either. My point is, that it could have and should have been so much better. I don't understand how people can not see this, including reviewers. Everyone played ME 1, did they not? I do understand that part of the new target audience doesn't care about some things that I care about, as long as it looks cool and you get to shoot stuff. But if you appreciate all the other things that made ME 1 a milestone in gaming history, is it really that hard to see that much of it is missing?
I'm not talking about ten years to make THE game, but maybe a half to one year to get the polish done and avoid all that cutting of corners. Preferably also implement a main plot that can hold water to part 1. (And get the ME 1 LIs right.) It would still be a reasonable time frame for a supposed blockbuster game.
T-Kay wrote...
The elevator rides were innovative loading screens with banter. Now we get boring loading screens with no banter. I don't see the improvement there.