Kinda. Not necessarily at the end of pregnancy, but not in the formation of the neurologic system stage.siriusrambles wrote...
are you saying it was likely he was exposed in the womb near the end of the pregnancy since his side effects were mild?Jade5233 wrote...
I think I have an embryology textbook at work somewhere and I'll think about it tomorrow if I have a chance. But I'd say bad effects are more likely as the nervous system is in rapid development--that it would cause more mutation than if the neuro system is more-or-less developed and then the eezo imbeds itself into it. Does that make sense? I'll postulate weeks of development later.
With birth defects, they tend to be more pronounced/severe with earlier stages of developement in general.
So with something that is carcinogenic, I would think that an earlier stage of developement would have more devastating effects.
Just a theory based on real world embryology/prenatal stuff.
EDIT: need a photo

Gosh he's sexy on Horizon.
Modifié par Jade5233, 19 août 2010 - 02:43 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





