137512 réponses à ce sujet

[BigKahuna25]

Terrorfex wrote...


WOOF WOOF.

arf bark woof bark.

[RevanKun123]

R34P3RR3D33M3R wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

RevanKun123 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

lol pretty much this. You can call me opportunist too, I do what is bst for the mission and Shepard regardless of what others have to say about it.

Hmm...That means you must have more enemies than friends.
But I suppose you don't care much about that. Am I correct?

Not really. It means I am friends with everyone. TIM is my buddy and so is Zaeed (let the workers burn). Having enemies goes against the mission.

Correction: Your Shepard is friends with everyone, you certainly aren't.

I was going to say that too.

[Geth Knight]

If you saved the workers you could have still had Zaeed as your buddy.

[Skilled Seeker]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

lol pretty much this. You can call me opportunist too, I do what is bst for the mission and Shepard regardless of what others have to say about it.

Which brings up a classic ethical/moral dilemma: How do you empirically know what is "best" for the mission? There are so many potential factors that come in to play that it is exceedingly unlikely one can make that claim with full knowledge of all relevant factors. Perhaps the best one can aim for is to use one's limited knowledge and experiences that seem most relevant to the situation at hand and devise a workable solution geared towards a pre-established goal.

Well for me it means making as many allies as possible while killing as many enemies or suspected enemies as possible. If I am unsure of someone (say the Rachni Queen) then I evaluate the consequences betrayal would have and compare the risk to the reward. If reward outways the risk then I let her live but make sure that she does not grow too powerful as well. Another example is the Geth and Quarians. I told the Quarians to stop the war yet destroyed the heretic geth as the Geth are already too strong as it is. Get what I'm saying?

[vykvyper1]

I'll just leave this here:whistle:

[danteshepard]

Lord_Moose wrote...

Legion, you can see just the hint of his N7 arm, but its there.
Kinda hard to read My Dwarva post in my warden voice. You have to know which voice i chose in character creation first.

You know that dwarf from lord of the rings? that's your voice.

[GHyland]

vykvyper1 wrote...

back for a few minutes... I'm going to ignore any current discussion and interject with a pictureB)

Buying Mass Effect 2 for the sheer awesome story and gameplay. £60

Snuggling up with Tali after kicking the collectors, the reapers and denying the illusive man.... Priceless!!!!

Love for Tali!!!!!!! <3

[Geth Knight]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

lol pretty much this. You can call me opportunist too, I do what is bst for the mission and Shepard regardless of what others have to say about it.

Which brings up a classic ethical/moral dilemma: How do you empirically know what is "best" for the mission? There are so many potential factors that come in to play that it is exceedingly unlikely one can make that claim with full knowledge of all relevant factors. Perhaps the best one can aim for is to use one's limited knowledge and experiences that seem most relevant to the situation at hand and devise a workable solution geared towards a pre-established goal.

Well for me it means making as many allies as possible while killing as many enemies or suspected enemies as possible. If I am unsure of someone (say the Rachni Queen) then I evaluate the consequences betrayal would have and compare the risk to the reward. If reward outways the risk then I let her live but make sure that she does not grow too powerful as well. Another example is the Geth and Quarians. I told the Quarians to stop the war yet destroyed the heretic geth as the Geth are already too strong as it is. Get what I'm saying?

You make it so that possible enemies 'owe you one'?

[inFam0us]

Terrorfex wrote...


WOOF WOOF.

hello terrorfex

lol

[Skilled Seeker]

Somebody1003 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

RevanKun123 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

lol pretty much this. You can call me opportunist too, I do what is bst for the mission and Shepard regardless of what others have to say about it.

Hmm...That means you must have more enemies than friends.
But I suppose you don't care much about that. Am I correct?

Not really. It means I am friends with everyone. TIM is my buddy and so is Zaeed (let the workers burn). Having enemies goes against the mission.

So you saved the collector base?

Yes. It might cause harm afterwards but I'd rather deal with that after the Reapers are dealt with. For now its best to be on TIM's good side.

[alickar]

vykvyper1 wrote...

I'll just leave this here:whistle:

kool tali pic

[alickar]

vykvyper1 wrote...

I'll just leave this here:whistle:

kool tali pic

[alickar]

oops double post srry

[RevanKun123]

Somebody1003 wrote...

I said f u TIM and blew that thing up.

Most of us did that too.

Modifié par RevanKun123, 01 mars 2010 - 10:25 .

[Skilled Seeker]

Geth Knight wrote...

If you saved the workers you could have still had Zaeed as your buddy.

True with metagaming knowledge. At the time it was not a risk I was willing to take.

[The_KFD_Case]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Not really. It means I am friends with everyone. TIM is my buddy and so is Zaeed (let the workers burn). Having enemies goes against the mission.

Fail. If you actually bothered to listen and read the mission objectives for Zaeed's loyalty mission, Shepard and Co. are supposd to liberate the refinery - that's the official mission. Furthermore, if you're Paragon you can still gain Zaeed's loyalty by persuading him that his selfish obsession with revenge endangers the overall mission which takes priority over his personal vendetta.

[inFam0us]

Tali is disappointed because of Skilled Seeker.

[Terrorfex]

I do not think I will ever see, someone more bootiful as Tali.







Heart.

[Skilled Seeker]

Geth Knight wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

lol pretty much this. You can call me opportunist too, I do what is bst for the mission and Shepard regardless of what others have to say about it.

Which brings up a classic ethical/moral dilemma: How do you empirically know what is "best" for the mission? There are so many potential factors that come in to play that it is exceedingly unlikely one can make that claim with full knowledge of all relevant factors. Perhaps the best one can aim for is to use one's limited knowledge and experiences that seem most relevant to the situation at hand and devise a workable solution geared towards a pre-established goal.

Well for me it means making as many allies as possible while killing as many enemies or suspected enemies as possible. If I am unsure of someone (say the Rachni Queen) then I evaluate the consequences betrayal would have and compare the risk to the reward. If reward outways the risk then I let her live but make sure that she does not grow too powerful as well. Another example is the Geth and Quarians. I told the Quarians to stop the war yet destroyed the heretic geth as the Geth are already too strong as it is. Get what I'm saying?

You make it so that possible enemies 'owe you one'?

Yes. best to play with a full deck of cards

[Lord_Moose]

danteshepard wrote...

Lord_Moose wrote...

Legion, you can see just the hint of his N7 arm, but its there.
Kinda hard to read My Dwarva post in my warden voice. You have to know which voice i chose in character creation first.

You know that dwarf from lord of the rings? that's your voice.

Gimili? Certinally not!
My voice is not the rough scratchy voice of that 'dwarf' It is the couragious powerful voice of the Aeducan Line, the voice that was wooed countless species and spat as his enemies like the venom on his blades.

[The_KFD_Case]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Not really. It means I am friends with everyone. TIM is my buddy and so is Zaeed (let the workers burn). Having enemies goes against the mission.

Fail. If you actually bothered to listen and read the mission objectives for Zaeed's loyalty mission, Shepard and Co. are supposd to liberate the refinery - that's the official mission. Furthermore, if you're Paragon you can still gain Zaeed's loyalty by persuading him that his selfish obsession with revenge endangers the overall mission which takes priority over his personal vendetta.

[HereticSon]

Yeah i told TIM to F off and blew the s*it up too ^^