137512 réponses à ce sujet

[Jake71887]

chool77 wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Haven't seen this before...

 

whare are you finding all of these pics ... i know its not google?   right?

haven't you already asked me this before? 

[sm00thie88]

cutthecameras wrote...

Yeah a guy friend of mine managed to make a dude believe he was a girl on webcam. He said he used some pre-recorded material of a girl being really emo for like 15 minutes before she starts taking off clothes...I don't know how he did it and frankly I don't wanna know. 

Works if the dude really believes you easy and doesn't wish some evidence like spontanious behaviour (pls wave in the camera for example). But you see, it can be easier than you thought. So the circle closes at this point: no empirical evidence on the internet.

[The_KFD_Case]

Jake71887 wrote...

Nothing against trannies, I just wouldn't consider someone who isn't born a woman, to actually be 100% a woman. 

Agreed.

Addendum: Or someone grown in a clone vat as a human female genetically speaking and supported by the completed physical end result.

[chool77]

Jake71887 wrote...

chool77 wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Haven't seen this before...

 

whare are you finding all of these pics ... i know its not google?   right?

haven't you already asked me this before? 

?? nooo.....

i think i would remember

[sm00thie88]

KFD btw. did you make it to upload some of your music as mp3. Would love to carry that stuff with me when on way to university etc.pp.

[Shazzammer2]

Jake71887 wrote...

 And just for KFD...

Interesting...err Impressive!

[cutthecameras]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

cutthecameras wrote...

Transsexual women aren't fake women.
So. I don't get it.

Depends on how you choose to define "fake". From a biologically perspective - barring gender changing surgery - yes, a male pretending to be a female and vice versa would be a "fake" representative of the assumed alternative gender.

I wholeheartedly agree. Though a male-born individual who has spent a significant amount of time on hormone replacement therapy, living as their preferred gender for years, and being recognized as female by everyone that they meet is hardly someone pretending to be anything and more just someone living their life as they see they should. Their commitment alone goes beyond simple "pretending".

[cutthecameras]

Jake71887 wrote...

 And just for KFD...

I too support this. 

[The_KFD_Case]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

Very close Mr. Buddha!...Except for the fact that I've never smoked a day in my life, I don't care much for the taste of brandy, I have a short buzz cut haircut and no slight paunch. 

Did I at least get the smoking jacket and chair right?  Because my worldview is going to be shattered otherwise.

I have a comfortable and ergonomically designed modern-styled office chair (I wouldn't describe it as an "overstuffed chair" however). Hm. Come to think of it I don't have a "smoking jacket" if you are refererring to a tuxedo jacket, though I do have several very nice suit jackets.

Modifié par The_KFD_Case, 10 mars 2010 - 08:32 .

[Jake71887]

 This is pretty much how I play ME... and every other Bioware game

[HK01]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

[NuclearBuddha]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

Very close Mr. Buddha!...Except for the fact that I've never smoked a day in my life, I don't care much for the taste of brandy, I have a short buzz cut haircut and no slight paunch. 

Did I at least get the smoking jacket and chair right?  Because my worldview is going to be shattered otherwise.

I have a comfortable and ergonimcally designed modern-styled office chair (I wouldn't describe it as an "overstuffed chair" however). Hm. Come to think of it I don't have a "smoking jacket" if you are refererring to a tuxedo jacket, though I do have several very nice suit jackets.

Worldview = shattered.  I am bereft of all support and lost in an unfriendly universe.  I blame you, KFD, and will seek eternal revenge.

But then again, that's what I get for assuming anything about a person on the internet.

[Jake71887]

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

I'm not suave enough to pull that off... 

[sm00thie88]

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

Jake can't smoke, kills sperms and may make you impotent.

[cutthecameras]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Nothing against trannies, I just wouldn't consider someone who isn't born a woman, to actually be 100% a woman. 

Agreed.

Addendum: Or someone grown in a clone vat as a human female genetically speaking and supported by the completed physical end result.

Haha I'd consider a clone a human being...jeez, you guys are harsh.

[The_KFD_Case]

sm00thie88 wrote...

Works if the dude really believes you easy and doesn't wish some evidence like spontanious behaviour (pls wave in the camera for example). But you see, it can be easier than you thought. So the circle closes at this point: no empirical evidence on the internet.

Not necessarily true. Once again it depends on the source of the information. Which brings us back to the issue of whether the presented information can be verified. In some cases it can and thus as long as this remains possible in at least one single instance the claim that no empirical evidence can be found on the internet is false. What needs to be taken in to account is that the internet itself may not be able to ascertain whether the empirical information provided on the internet is in fact empirical, which in turn brings us back to using external means of verification.

[The_KFD_Case]

cutthecameras wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Nothing against trannies, I just wouldn't consider someone who isn't born a woman, to actually be 100% a woman. 

Agreed.

Addendum: Or someone grown in a clone vat as a human female genetically speaking and supported by the completed physical end result.

Haha I'd consider a clone a human being...jeez, you guys are harsh.

The addendum wasn't ruling a cloned human being out. On the contrary. It was added for clarification to ensure that someone grown as a clone with the proper DNA sequences as a human female, along with the requisite physical female attributes, would also be accepted as a "real" female, at least in my book.

[sm00thie88]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

sm00thie88 wrote...

Works if the dude really believes you easy and doesn't wish some evidence like spontanious behaviour (pls wave in the camera for example). But you see, it can be easier than you thought. So the circle closes at this point: no empirical evidence on the internet.

Not necessarily true. Once again it depends on the source of the information. Which brings us back to the issue of whether the presented information can be verified. In some cases it can and thus as long as this remains possible in at least one single instance the claim that no empirical evidence can be found on the internet is false. What needs to be taken in to account is that the internet itself may not be able to ascertain whether the empirical information provided on the internet is in fact empirical, which in turn brings us back to using external means of verification.

Which leads us back to the need of those external sources and therefore not finding empirical evidence on the net that is trustable. For example: Ever tried to quote wikipedia in a scientistic work? People will slaughter you.

So what about the mp3 files ?

[Jake71887]

cutthecameras wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Nothing against trannies, I just wouldn't consider someone who isn't born a woman, to actually be 100% a woman. 

Agreed.

Addendum: Or someone grown in a clone vat as a human female genetically speaking and supported by the completed physical end result.

Haha I'd consider a clone a human being...jeez, you guys are harsh.

What if it's a clone of Paris Hilton? 

[NuclearBuddha]

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

No, Jake is a large man, more stocky than fat, with short-cut hair (in the interest of being low maintenance).  He leans over his computer in a predatory fashion, lips skinned back to reveal a veritable graveyard of crooked teeth  Occasionally he gives a giggle or snort, but otherwise works in eerie silence.  Empty plates, once containing food but now devoid even of crumbs, are stacked very neatly nearby, along with a tidy pyramid of empty juice boxes.

[cutthecameras]

Jake71887 wrote...

cutthecameras wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Nothing against trannies, I just wouldn't consider someone who isn't born a woman, to actually be 100% a woman. 

Agreed.

Addendum: Or someone grown in a clone vat as a human female genetically speaking and supported by the completed physical end result.

Haha I'd consider a clone a human being...jeez, you guys are harsh.

What if it's a clone of Paris Hilton? 

There's always a catch...

[HK01]

Jake71887 wrote...

cutthecameras wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Nothing against trannies, I just wouldn't consider someone who isn't born a woman, to actually be 100% a woman. 

Agreed.

Addendum: Or someone grown in a clone vat as a human female genetically speaking and supported by the completed physical end result.

Haha I'd consider a clone a human being...jeez, you guys are harsh.

What if it's a clone of Paris Hilton? 

The real one isn't even human, how could a clone be?

[NuclearBuddha]

Jake71887 wrote...

cutthecameras wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

Nothing against trannies, I just wouldn't consider someone who isn't born a woman, to actually be 100% a woman. 

Agreed.

Addendum: Or someone grown in a clone vat as a human female genetically speaking and supported by the completed physical end result.

Haha I'd consider a clone a human being...jeez, you guys are harsh.

What if it's a clone of Paris Hilton? 

It has to be a clone of a human being to be considered a human being.

Edit:  Curse you HK!

Modifié par NuclearBuddha, 10 mars 2010 - 08:39 .

[The_KFD_Case]

sm00thie88 wrote...

KFD btw. did you make it to upload some of your music as mp3. Would love to carry that stuff with me when on way to university etc.pp.

Nope; I haven't gotten around to that yet. When/if I do I will make a mental note of spreading the word in a place (such as here) where you may pick up on it.