137512 réponses à ce sujet

[The_KFD_Case]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

What if it's a clone of Paris Hilton? 

It has to be a clone of a human being to be considered a human being.

Ouh BURN! 

[sm00thie88]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

sm00thie88 wrote...

KFD btw. did you make it to upload some of your music as mp3. Would love to carry that stuff with me when on way to university etc.pp.

Nope; I haven't gotten around to that yet. When/if I do I will make a mental note of spreading the word in a place (such as here) where you may pick up on it.

Would you mind if I download some of the tracks on your youtube channel via downloader and convert them into mp3 - for private use of course?

[Jake71887]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

No, Jake is a large man, more stocky than fat, with short-cut hair (in the interest of being low maintenance).  He leans over his computer in a predatory fashion, lips skinned back to reveal a veritable graveyard of crooked teeth  Occasionally he gives a giggle or snort, but otherwise works in eerie silence.  Empty plates, once containing food but now devoid even of crumbs, are stacked very neatly nearby, along with a tidy pyramid of empty juice boxes.

Eerily dead on, except I don't have crooked teeth really(Though I do have large canines)... I don't giggle, but I do occasionally give  a "heh"... And I can't drink juice boxes 

[The_KFD_Case]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

Worldview = shattered.  I am bereft of all support and lost in an unfriendly universe.  I blame you, KFD, and will seek eternal revenge.

But then again, that's what I get for assuming anything about a person on the internet.

Or you could just have asked for details and ascertained whether I was receptive towards providing answers (and hope that I would be truthful).

[NuclearBuddha]

Jake71887 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

No, Jake is a large man, more stocky than fat, with short-cut hair (in the interest of being low maintenance).  He leans over his computer in a predatory fashion, lips skinned back to reveal a veritable graveyard of crooked teeth  Occasionally he gives a giggle or snort, but otherwise works in eerie silence.  Empty plates, once containing food but now devoid even of crumbs, are stacked very neatly nearby, along with a tidy pyramid of empty juice boxes.

Eerily dead on, except I don't have crooked teeth really(Though I do have large canines)... I don't giggle, but I do occasionally give  a "heh"... And I can't drink juice boxes 

Crap, I forgot the diabeetus.  Exchange that for distilled water bottles, then.  I was trying to give the image of someone creepily fastidius.

[NuclearBuddha]

antilles333 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

antilles333 wrote...

I love Nuclear's sig. Straight to the point, lol. Good read too.

Thank you, on both counts.  I've come to love understatement.

What understatement? The sig itself? 

Yes.  And your own understatement, too, I can appreciate.

[Jake71887]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

No, Jake is a large man, more stocky than fat, with short-cut hair (in the interest of being low maintenance).  He leans over his computer in a predatory fashion, lips skinned back to reveal a veritable graveyard of crooked teeth  Occasionally he gives a giggle or snort, but otherwise works in eerie silence.  Empty plates, once containing food but now devoid even of crumbs, are stacked very neatly nearby, along with a tidy pyramid of empty juice boxes.

Eerily dead on, except I don't have crooked teeth really(Though I do have large canines)... I don't giggle, but I do occasionally give  a "heh"... And I can't drink juice boxes 

Crap, I forgot the diabeetus.  Exchange that for distilled water bottles, then.  I was trying to give the image of someone creepily fastidius.

More like 2L bottles of Diet Pepsi... the remains of which forming a sort of graveyard in a corner of my room. 

[NuclearBuddha]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

Worldview = shattered.  I am bereft of all support and lost in an unfriendly universe.  I blame you, KFD, and will seek eternal revenge.

But then again, that's what I get for assuming anything about a person on the internet.

Or you could just have asked for details and ascertained whether I was receptive towards providing answers (and hope that I would be truthful).

But ASKING is bad form, and an invitation to be lied to.  It's more fun to make stuff up.

Edit:  And why give the impression that I care?  This is the internet, I'd hate anyone to know that!

Modifié par NuclearBuddha, 10 mars 2010 - 08:44 .

[SpatFieya]

Jake71887 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

No, Jake is a large man, more stocky than fat, with short-cut hair (in the interest of being low maintenance).  He leans over his computer in a predatory fashion, lips skinned back to reveal a veritable graveyard of crooked teeth  Occasionally he gives a giggle or snort, but otherwise works in eerie silence.  Empty plates, once containing food but now devoid even of crumbs, are stacked very neatly nearby, along with a tidy pyramid of empty juice boxes.

Eerily dead on, except I don't have crooked teeth really(Though I do have large canines)... I don't giggle, but I do occasionally give  a "heh"... And I can't drink juice boxes 

Crap, I forgot the diabeetus.  Exchange that for distilled water bottles, then.  I was trying to give the image of someone creepily fastidius.

More like 2L bottles of Diet Pepsi... the remains of which forming a sort of graveyard in a corner of my room. 

You don't like Dr.Pepper but you drink Diet Pepsi?

D:

[alickar]

im back again

[Jake71887]

SpatFieya wrote...
You don't like Dr.Pepper but you drink Diet Pepsi?

D:

Diet Dr Pepper tastes like arm-pitts 

[The_KFD_Case]

sm00thie88 wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

sm00thie88 wrote...

Works if the dude really believes you easy and doesn't wish some evidence like spontanious behaviour (pls wave in the camera for example). But you see, it can be easier than you thought. So the circle closes at this point: no empirical evidence on the internet.

Not necessarily true. Once again it depends on the source of the information. Which brings us back to the issue of whether the presented information can be verified. In some cases it can and thus as long as this remains possible in at least one single instance the claim that no empirical evidence can be found on the internet is false. What needs to be taken in to account is that the internet itself may not be able to ascertain whether the empirical information provided on the internet is in fact empirical, which in turn brings us back to using external means of verification.

Which leads us back to the need of those external sources and therefore not finding empirical evidence on the net that is trustable. For example: Ever tried to quote wikipedia in a scientistic work? People will slaughter you.

So what about the mp3 files ?

Again, that does not disprove the posibility of empirical evidence being placed online. That it may require additional resources beyond the internet to be certain of the veracity of the information placed online does not automatically negate the possibility that the information stored online may in fact be empirical. Also, when I was working on my dissertation for my Master's degree both online and more traditional literary sources were accepted, if not outright demanded. True, if one had only gone with online sources that might have been considered problematic yet what may be equally important is the source of the information found online. Technically the same can be said of any printed article or book. Anyone with the resources can publish a book - factual or not.

[BigKahuna25]

Jake71887 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

HK01 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

My image of KFD was a dude with a smoking jacket sitting in an overstuffed chair, possibly with a cigarette in a cigarette holder.  Half-full brandy glass on a side-table.  Slicked back hair, slight paunch.

That sounds like Jake to me

No, Jake is a large man, more stocky than fat, with short-cut hair (in the interest of being low maintenance).  He leans over his computer in a predatory fashion, lips skinned back to reveal a veritable graveyard of crooked teeth  Occasionally he gives a giggle or snort, but otherwise works in eerie silence.  Empty plates, once containing food but now devoid even of crumbs, are stacked very neatly nearby, along with a tidy pyramid of empty juice boxes.

Eerily dead on, except I don't have crooked teeth really(Though I do have large canines)... I don't giggle, but I do occasionally give  a "heh"... And I can't drink juice boxes 

I'd say do me but i dont think you're on very much when i am.

[SpatFieya]

Jake71887 wrote...

SpatFieya wrote...
You don't like Dr.Pepper but you drink Diet Pepsi?

D:

Diet Dr Pepper tastes like arm-pitts 

Yeah Diet DP tastes bad.

But regular DP is great. :happy:

[NuclearBuddha]

BigKahuna25 wrote...

I'd say do me but i dont think you're on very much when i am.

Do you?  But I hardly know you!  Usually there's dinner and a movie first.

[cutthecameras]

Jake71887 wrote...

SpatFieya wrote...
You don't like Dr.Pepper but you drink Diet Pepsi?

D:

Diet Dr Pepper tastes like arm-pitts 

I thought that's how all diet soda tasted? 

[Jake71887]

cutthecameras wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

SpatFieya wrote...
You don't like Dr.Pepper but you drink Diet Pepsi?

D:

Diet Dr Pepper tastes like arm-pitts 

I thought that's how all diet soda tasted? 

*sigh* Thanks for rubbing it in.. Jerk 

[BigKahuna25]

SpatFieya wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

SpatFieya wrote...
You don't like Dr.Pepper but you drink Diet Pepsi?

D:

Diet Dr Pepper tastes like arm-pitts 

Yeah Diet DP tastes bad.

But regular DP is great. :happy:

akin to the nectar of the gods...

[The_KFD_Case]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

But ASKING is bad form, and an invitation to be lied to.  It's more fun to make stuff up.

Edit:  And why give the impression that I care?  This is the internet, I'd hate anyone to know that!

Suit yourself.

[sm00thie88]

The_KFD_Case wrote...



Again, that does not disprove the posibility of empirical evidence being placed online. That it may require additional resources beyond the internet to be certain of the veracity of the information placed online does not automatically negate the possibility that the information stored online may in fact be empirical. Also, when I was working on my dissertation for my Master's degree both online and more traditional literary sources were accepted, if not outright demanded. True, if one had only gone with online sources that might have been considered problematic yet what may be equally important is the source of the information found online. Technically the same can be said of any printed article or book. Anyone with the resources can publish a book - factual or not.

And this is absolutely correct. So we should correct the sentense into: no trustable empircial evidence is found online.
Because, as we know, information provided on the net needs to be verified within external sources, otherwise the possiblities provided by the www of faking content are indefinite.

[cutthecameras]

Jake71887 wrote...

cutthecameras wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...

SpatFieya wrote...
You don't like Dr.Pepper but you drink Diet Pepsi?

D:

Diet Dr Pepper tastes like arm-pitts 

I thought that's how all diet soda tasted? 

*sigh* Thanks for rubbing it in.. Jerk 

Can't help it; I'm quite good at that. 

[chool77]

http://fav.me/d2gpqq1


fail... did not work...=(

Modifié par chool77, 10 mars 2010 - 08:49 .

[NuclearBuddha]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

But ASKING is bad form, and an invitation to be lied to.  It's more fun to make stuff up.

Edit:  And why give the impression that I care?  This is the internet, I'd hate anyone to know that!

Suit yourself.

Hedgehog's dilemma.  Sucks, but there you have it.