137512 réponses à ce sujet

[alickar]

runescapeguy9 wrote...

JeanLuc761 wrote...

alickar wrote...

-snip-
this game is on 360 look at the graphics wish mass effect had graphics like this

Almost 100% certain that's pre-rendered.

My thoughts as well.

nope japo made game also has a fourm on gamespot its also supposed to come out somewhere in 2010

[danteshepard]

Gerudan wrote...

Shazzammer2 wrote...

Ok ill give you tht much. But what is interesting about Samara? Are ya sure the suite isnt talking to ya?? haha

Are you serious? She is nearly a 1000 years old, all the history, all the adventures, stories and experience she lived through and can tell from... 

 yeah plus she's like a blue wonder woman without the BDSM rope

[starwarsmike1]

[epoch_]

I posted it on the last page.



It is indeed, amazing. Tali needs to look like that.

[JeanLuc761]

alickar wrote...

heres a more clear version of the graphics in game person in armor has very realistic face armor as well and including u can command over 10000 troops in here this game is pretty realistic if this games graphics  was down sized into mass effect would look almost like a movie

Not bad.

The model count is impressively high but the lighting could use a lot of work and so could the shaders.  I think Mass Effect is looking fine as is.  You let me know when we have technology to make games look like the pre-rendered Mass Effect 2 trailers and I will singlehandedly attempt to buy the rights for a remake of the trilogy.

[huntrrz]

Phil725 wrote...

huntrrz wrote...

Somebody1003 wrote...

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Personally, I think it'd be idiocy on Bioware's part to write all of the characters out and introduce an all-new cast for the finale of a trilogy. Not only would 80% of the fanbase march up to Canada and riot, but it would completely contradict all the time you spent recruiting and getting to know "the best of the best."

What about bringing back squaddies from ME1?

I think that's what you'll get - if you managed to kill off all your supporting squad members, you'll have those held back from ME1 so you'll at least have two to join you on missions.

You can't kill off everyone.  You need 2 people alive I think (may be one,) or else Shepard dies and you can't import into ME3.

True.  I overstated, but I think the gist is correct - you'll get Ashley/Kaiden and Liara back and they'll give you two squaddies to choose from regardless of how many ME2 characters survived.  I expect them to voice all the ME2 characters and simply not present them if they were killed.  I don't expect any brand new characters.  That'll present the 'consequences' of getting your crew killed without making the game unwinnable.

That's my guess, anyway.

[Phil725]

Knoll Argonar wrote...

Anyway, Crysis is just unbeatable. That's not its best pic for sure, but in real motion is awesome.

But, What I really want people to notice is THIS:
*snip*

Has it been posted in a few hundreds of pages ago or are you just blind? THIS IS INCREDIBLE! O_O

Been posted dozens of times all throughout today.  A good picture though.

[Angelraid]

epoch_ wrote...

Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...

sergio71785 wrote...

epoch_ wrote...

EA isn't as bad as they were. Its time for whoever's still hating them to reexamine the company.

Activision is the new devil.

Yeah, EA isn't nearly as "evil" as they once seemed.

I don't really have a problem with them publishing BioWare's stuff. It seems to me that they give BioWare complete--or very close to complete--control over their projects.

It's an absolutely beautiful thing when a talented development studio has access to tons of financial resources, while at the same time keeping complete creative control. Some notable examples of this would be Valve and Blizzard.

Sorry had to come back to say that blizzard sold out to the devil long ago after the success of WoW. They are now part of activision, and are one of the worst examples of what happens to good developers when they get rich. WoW completely massacred the story of Warcraft and the new Starcraft instalments (yes pluaral) further points to thier greed as a major motivating factor.

blizzard is fine. People are still getting mad over the installments? Every major new RTS game has expansions. They're big money and it'd be stupid if Blizzard didn't offer them. You don't need them, they're mostly singleplayer anwyays. They just add a few new units to the multiplayer.

Why should I get screwed out of campaign content, just because YOU don't want it. Don't want to sink more money into the game, fine, dont buy it. Sorry that was OT, but it makes me nerdrage when I see people talk down SC2 expansions.

It's not an expansion when it cost as much as the game itself. Theyre just money grubbin. Just like they did with WoW. Story is important to me, thats one of the reasons I love ME. Blizz butchered warcraft and there selling out with SC too. the story in SC might still be good but they are certainly milking it for every penny. They don't care anything about thier fans anymore. thier in it for the money.

[cachx]

alickar wrote...

heres a more clear version of the graphics in game person in armor has very realistic face armor as well and including u can command over 10000 troops in here this game is pretty realistic if this games graphics  was down sized into mass effect would look almost like a movie

Just out of curiosity, are there videos of that game in motion? those pictures could just be "bullshots".

[alickar]

DrathanGervaise wrote...

GMR25 wrote...

alickar wrote...

heres a more clear version of the graphics in game person in armor has very realistic face armor as well and including u can command over 10000 troops in here this game is pretty realistic if this games graphics  was down sized into mass effect would look almost like a movie

Mass Effect still looks better than that.

I don't know man, those graphics are pretty sweet.

dude u can command 10000 troops on battlefield at once!!!!!!!! if tht was taken out graphic would be much much better thn this even right now it looks like its graphics r better

[shnizzler93]

runescapeguy9 wrote...

shnizzler93 wrote...
Don't worry, the Xbox 1080 will be able to do that in 2025

Imagine how far computers will have advanced by then...
I'm thinking 3d gaming prototypes?

haha, 4d where we will actually be a part of the games, instead of just playing them

Modifié par shnizzler93, 12 mars 2010 - 01:02 .

[DirtyVagrant]

Knoll Argonar wrote...
Has it been posted in a few hundreds of pages ago or are you just blind? THIS IS INCREDIBLE! O_O

Are you kidding? I've drawn better in MS Paint.
...I mean, I KNOW! That artist is bloody talented... like... wow! I love the subtle hints of cybernetic augmentation, it's perfect. Only nitpick is that I kinda want quarians to have a unique alien skintone, so they won't be AS human-like, you know? But if Tali was reveal her face and she looked like that, I'd be UBER happy.

[GMR25]

DrathanGervaise wrote...

GMR25 wrote...

alickar wrote...

heres a more clear version of the graphics in game person in armor has very realistic face armor as well and including u can command over 10000 troops in here this game is pretty realistic if this games graphics  was down sized into mass effect would look almost like a movie

Mass Effect still looks better than that.

I don't know man, those graphics are pretty sweet.

Black & White 2 has better graphics, it was released 5 or so years ago.

[sergio71785]

Okay okay, let's not turn turn this into a Crysis vs. console graphics debate, that was not my intention when I brought it up.



I was just saying, it would be just awesome to be posting screenshots and whatnot of Tali with super highrez textures and all that good stuff.



Back on topic!

[alickar]

alickar wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

GMR25 wrote...

alickar wrote...

heres a more clear version of the graphics in game person in armor has very realistic face armor as well and including u can command over 10000 troops in here this game is pretty realistic if this games graphics  was down sized into mass effect would look almost like a movie

Mass Effect still looks better than that.

I don't know man, those graphics are pretty sweet.

dude u can command 10000 troops on battlefield at once!!!!!!!! if tht was taken out graphic would be much much better thn this even right now it looks like its graphics r better

yes there is a vid here is link

[shnizzler93]

sergio71785 wrote...

Okay okay, let's not turn turn this into a Crysis vs. console graphics debate, that was not my intention when I brought it up.

I was just saying, it would be just awesome to be posting screenshots and whatnot of Tali with super highrez textures and all that good stuff.

Back on topic!

saved!

[Phil725]

huntrrz wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

huntrrz wrote...
*snip*
I think that's what you'll get - if you managed to kill off all your supporting squad members, you'll have those held back from ME1 so you'll at least have two to join you on missions.

You can't kill off everyone.  You need 2 people alive I think (may be one,) or else Shepard dies and you can't import into ME3.

True.  I overstated, but I think the gist is correct - you'll get Ashley/Kaiden and Liara back and they'll give you two squaddies to choose from regardless of how many ME2 characters survived.  I expect them to voice all the ME2 characters and simply not present them if they were killed.  I don't expect any brand new characters.  That'll present the 'consequences' of getting your crew killed without making the game unwinnable.

That's my guess, anyway.

They could add 1 or 2 new characters just to bring the minimum squad up to the same amount as ME1.  Even if they didn't though, 4 or 5 squad mates is plenty.  A lot less work than writing in an entire new team.  I think that's easily the most likely path for Bioware to take.

[alickar]

GMR25 wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

GMR25 wrote...

alickar wrote...

heres a more clear version of the graphics in game person in armor has very realistic face armor as well and including u can command over 10000 troops in here this game is pretty realistic if this games graphics  was down sized into mass effect would look almost like a movie

Mass Effect still looks better than that.

I don't know man, those graphics are pretty sweet.

Black & White 2 has better graphics, it was released 5 or so years ago.

ur not getting point u have 10000 troops on battlefield at once of course it with downsize graphics if u take tht part out graphics will look much much more better

[epoch_]

Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...

epoch_ wrote...

Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...

sergio71785 wrote...

epoch_ wrote...

EA isn't as bad as they were. Its time for whoever's still hating them to reexamine the company.

Activision is the new devil.

Yeah, EA isn't nearly as "evil" as they once seemed.

I don't really have a problem with them publishing BioWare's stuff. It seems to me that they give BioWare complete--or very close to complete--control over their projects.

It's an absolutely beautiful thing when a talented development studio has access to tons of financial resources, while at the same time keeping complete creative control. Some notable examples of this would be Valve and Blizzard.

Sorry had to come back to say that blizzard sold out to the devil long ago after the success of WoW. They are now part of activision, and are one of the worst examples of what happens to good developers when they get rich. WoW completely massacred the story of Warcraft and the new Starcraft instalments (yes pluaral) further points to thier greed as a major motivating factor.

blizzard is fine. People are still getting mad over the installments? Every major new RTS game has expansions. They're big money and it'd be stupid if Blizzard didn't offer them. You don't need them, they're mostly singleplayer anwyays. They just add a few new units to the multiplayer.

Why should I get screwed out of campaign content, just because YOU don't want it. Don't want to sink more money into the game, fine, dont buy it. Sorry that was OT, but it makes me nerdrage when I see people talk down SC2 expansions.

It's not an expansion when it cost as much as the game itself. Theyre just money grubbin. Just like they did with WoW. Story is important to me, thats one of the reasons I love ME. Blizz butchered warcraft and there selling out with SC too. the story in SC might still be good but they are certainly milking it for every penny. They don't care anything about thier fans anymore. thier in it for the money.

They haven't said anything about pricing yet, but I really doubt they're going to try to sell people another $50 campaign addon. And if they do, I'll eat my words. Until then, there is no reason to think they will.

[FenixPendragon]

Phil725 wrote...

huntrrz wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

huntrrz wrote...
*snip*
I think that's what you'll get - if you managed to kill off all your supporting squad members, you'll have those held back from ME1 so you'll at least have two to join you on missions.

You can't kill off everyone.  You need 2 people alive I think (may be one,) or else Shepard dies and you can't import into ME3.

True.  I overstated, but I think the gist is correct - you'll get Ashley/Kaiden and Liara back and they'll give you two squaddies to choose from regardless of how many ME2 characters survived.  I expect them to voice all the ME2 characters and simply not present them if they were killed.  I don't expect any brand new characters.  That'll present the 'consequences' of getting your crew killed without making the game unwinnable.

That's my guess, anyway.

They could add 1 or 2 new characters just to bring the minimum squad up to the same amount as ME1.  Even if they didn't though, 4 or 5 squad mates is plenty.  A lot less work than writing in an entire new team.  I think that's easily the most likely path for Bioware to take.

Yeah only need two...Tali and Legion.

[The_KFD_Case]

alickar wrote...

1 disc cannot hold 90 to 100 hrs of gameplay to much info stored on disc need multiple discs to play all tht content

Given current technology yes (although Blu-Ray can store up to 50 GB of date vs. 8 or so GB of data a DVD can store), but with the PC what happens is that you install all the discs and then only need one disc (usually the first disc) to play the game. Easy as pie.

[alickar]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

alickar wrote...

1 disc cannot hold 90 to 100 hrs of gameplay to much info stored on disc need multiple discs to play all tht content

Given current technology yes (although Blu-Ray can store up to 50 GB of date vs. 8 or so GB of data a DVD can store), but with the PC what happens is that you install all the discs and then only need one disc (usually the first disc) to play the game. Easy as pie.

i ment on 360

[sergio71785]

<3