Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Terrorfex wrote...
The_KFD_Case wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
The_KFD_Case wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Well Samara is sorta the opposite of that. Letting the lack of emotion to allow her to do things that most wouldnt normally consider an act of integrity. Like murdering a good cop for doing her job.
If you engage Samara in conversation she states that the code does not exist for moral enlightenment but as a means of punishing the wicked. She isn't oblivious to the criticism her code faces at the hands of moralistic dissenters yet she remains unapologetic for carrying out the very black-or-white teachings of the code. It is impressive in one regard while disturbing in another, IMO. Again though, if you speak to her at length it isn't that she doesn't have emotions nor is incapable of friendly discussions; her discipline does not remove these parts of her persona, it simply helps her override them. That is different from being devoid of understanding and knowing what compassion is for example, even if the physical end results may amount to much the same thing.
To punish the wicked yes. But the code dictates the same punishment no matter what the crime. death. furthermore the crux the becomes what is wickedness. Everyone is guilty to some extent. which would lead to universal genocide. Even the justicars themselves are not above reproach yet they do not commit suicide for thier own actions. which is hypocracy. another turn off.
As Samara points out the Asari justicars are similar to the Council Spectres, though Shepard is correct in pointing out that the Spectres (at least in theory) have some oversight from the Council itself. As with the Spectres so too do I think it is with the justicars: While the justicars are obligated to punish the wicked there may still be some leeway as to which of the wicked they go after first and foremost. Example: Samara on Omega comments on the rampant abuses on Omega, yet she does not stray from her oath to Shepard's mission. Also, before swearing the oath to Shepard, she once had an encounter with a Turian Spectre - she chose to let him escape because he deliberately endangered the lives of many innocents. She chose to save them instead of killing him indicating that she is not without the ability to think for herself even while adhering to the code. If that is the case for her then perhaps some of the other justicars act similarly, just as different Spectres act differently too (i.e. some arrest criminals while others simply kill them where they stand)?
As for justicars not being above reproach I concur. What evidence do we have that if any justicars have gone rogue that they haven't committed suicide? Perhaps some have, perhaps some haven't. If some haven't I strongly suspect that the code would compel other justicars to hunt their former colleague down. We simply do not have enough detailed information about all things justicar to ascertain these things with empirical confidence.
THE FOLLOWING IS A SERIOUS POST
The Justicar system is by definition bent to self-policing, albeit imperfectly. When anything approaching a theological or absolutist authoritiarian order is defined by a set of inflexible documents and/or narrow intepretation of conduct and gives rise to a "rogue" element, those elements are invariably suppressed, hunted down or challenged by the majority of the individuals produced by that same system.
The Justicars do not need oversight in the same way as C-Sec needs it - The near total majority of Justicars who emerge from their order will be compelled to remove rogue Justicars by their code which leaves no room for intepretation in such matters. The difference between C-Sec, and even the Spectres and the Justicar order being of course that the latter has supreme and total authority to act whereas even Spectres do not.
To clarify in my post I wasn't talking about rogue justicars that need to be hunted down I was talking about the fact that even normal justicars have done things in the past that would likely contradict the code. For example. Asari are often mercs in thier maiden stage - then something happens that makes them decide to become a justicar (like what happened to Samara) Now the code would compel them to kill a person who does something wicked. And they know that they have, yet they dont kill themselves. Selective Justice Much. No one is above flaw, everyone no matter how noble or good has made mistakes and has wickedness inside them. The only way the code could overcome this is if justicars where trained from birth thus thier actions could be excused as under the code but thier not so 
THE FOLLOWING IS A SERIOUS POSTThere's nothing about the Justicar code that assumes retrospective punishment. There are plenty of real-world examples where a person's history can be perfectly, legally, "masked". The classic example would be the French Foreign Legion, which even allows those to enlist with "false" names.
There's plenty of real-world examples of individuals who led questionable lives until dedicating themselves to a cause or goal entirely noble and proper. There's no reason to assume the Asari Justicar Code is retrospective; that'd be self-defeating - it would probably lead to the order dying out.
To command the power and authority of a Justicar would require a lot of real-world experience before one even began the path. To know what is good and proper, one must know what is not. I would posit that a hypothetical Justicar who had never done a questionable thing, never made a true error of judgement or act would be a less capable Justicar.