Phil725 wrote...
glenboy24 wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
*snip*
Can people please stop saying "most canon?" Our canon info consists of little more than they have two eyes. Everything else is up for debate. If you want to think that that's the most likely appearance of quarians than fine, but lets not pretend it has more truth to it than any of the others.
While I will agree that some of us are getting a tad carried away
with the, "This IS what she looks like," comments, you can not
really say that the only Canon info we have is that they have two
eyes. There is alot more than that. Between the Books, the Wiki
(which, much like the DA wiki, is updated 'by' the Dev team) and
assorted statements by the likes of Casey Hudson and others
we have more than few clues as to what the general appearence
of the Quarian people is. We just don't have a 'complete' look yet
for Tali, face wise.
Don't get me wrong, we have tons of "clues." Clues that are just conclusive enough for us to speculate, and vague enough for Bioware to go in whatever direction they want. When I say canon info, I mean confirmed, absolutely known info. We have very little of that. There are near infinite ways people can draw quarians and still be able to justify it with all the pieces of info you listed.
Don't get me wrong, I think people can get creative. But! Only to
a certain degree. Take for instance the Picture that started this.
She looks like a Lizard. Quarians are Mammal analogues, i.e.
they decended from a Simian-Species. Now, for those that keep
that in mind, I'm sure they could argue thier points. Otherwise, not
so much. Ok, need to make this Non-Wall 'O Text next time. Hate
being a hipocrit.