Collider wrote...
The_KFD_Case wrote...
Collider wrote...
The_KFD_Case wrote...
1) So you want to play games then? Right, well I see you already failed the relatively simple task of quoting where I specifically stated that you were self-important.
The problem is that I NEVER said that you said I was being self-important. But yet again, you are assuming things.
3) Oh I still suspect you are a hypocrite. History shows that most, if not all, people are at some point or another during their lifespans. Quite possibly on numerous occasions. Yes, I too have engaged in hypocritical behaviour in my life and I suspect I may end up doing so again at some point in the future. However, on this matter I haven't. 
I've never claimed that you were a hypocrite. You however have implied that I've been hypocritical.
4) Speaking of ridiculous...What would you call old teens-to-young-men going into nerd rage storms over people not doing exactly as they want in a thread?
Hold on KFD. You're the one implying that the members of my group are fascists, and implying that I am a hypocrite. Whereas I was simply advertising the thread, you are personally insulting me and other people. Who is nerd raging here? You never had to respond to me and be insulting, but here you are.
1) Really? Perhaps this will refresh your memory:
"
Yea, I'm sure that you
think the members of my group are self-important fascists, and not me. If you
want to play this game, I never said that you said I was a fascist. My exact
words, unless you'd like to correct me, were "I'm acting self-important?"
Which is a question rather than a declaration."
So what you're now saying is that your previous logic only applies when you thought it served your position and now you are back peddaling because it no longer serves you. How convenient I'm sure.
Uh, no. Nothing you italicized there shows that I said you called me a self-important fascist. Did you even read what you quoted from me?
3) Hold on nothing, Collider. I asked you two straight forward questions which you are now doing your best to try and avoid addressing because if you do you will be forced to either lie or concede my point. Furthermore, based upon the actions and comments of some of your group's members they were acting in a fascist-like manner on more than one occasion on this thread. No amount of denial will change that.
And what were those questions? Put out one instance in which I lied. I already answered your question about whether I would allow people to advertise their own threads and groups more than once. But if you have faulty memory, I'll answer it AGAIN. Yes I would.
It is correct that I did not have to respond to you, just as you did not have to advertise another thread in this thread which was created because you and yours apparently were disgruntled over the direction this thread has taken.
Here's the difference. Whereas I was simply posting the link, you responded to me and then proceeded to insult people. I would say insulting people - including me - over posting a link to a group is more indicative of someone raging.
If you are going to make public comments and/or advertisements be prepared to be called on them. If you aren't, or if you do not wish to deal with such a potential occurrence, then don't make them.
I'm fully capable and willing to call you out on your bull****. That's what I'm doing right now.
1) Still trying to weasel your way out of your earlier stated posts, Collider? How very disingenuous of you. Quick, better go back and delete or edit them! And yes, I did read the quoted post just I read your other posts leading up to that which, when taken in order, confirm what I claimed previously.Perhaps your memory is not serving you well on this occasion...Or could it perhaps be that you are trying avoid addressing an inconvenient truth?
Speaking of quotes, I see you still haven't managed to quote me on specifically calling you "self-important" despite making the claim that I did. Don't worry: I won't go back and doctor my previous posts. I look forward to seeing your proof.
2) You are not bringing up a different question. The two questions I referred were in a latter post that came after the question you are referring to. The two questions dealt with whether it is ridiculous for some of your groups members to act like children throwing a temper tantrum in this thread because other thread goers wouldn't conform to what they wanted. Feel free to answer whether you think acting in such a manner is ridiculous or not.
3) Right, so you find my comments towards you offensive just as I find your active recruitment for a group that threw a hissy fit over not getting its way previously in this thread offensive. Call us even.
4) Speaking of calling someone out on "bull****" that is precisely what I'm doing with you, it's what I've been doing since this brouhaha started. Despite your continued efforts to dodge questions and play dumb the bull**** stench is still there, Collider. You're going to have to do better than this I'm afraid.