TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
he didnt give sufficient warning...sufficient warning would have been something to the effect of: picture cntaining pornographic material.click at own risk... his obscure warning is horrible considering not everyone is bothered by the same material. my warning would have a better chance at not leading someone to be offended by the material depictedThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
people that dont undertsand pron might click on it however so they didnt have sufficient warningThe_KFD_Case wrote...
I didn't mind. You gave proper warning and it was via a link thus no one was forced to see the image in question.
Nonetheless a warning was provided. An individual - barring certain mitigating circumstances - is not absolved of individual initiative and consequent responsibility. "Freedom under responsibility" as the officers and NCOs used to say to us in the Army.
In your opinion. My opinion differs. He provided a warning. That should indicate to any person at least halfway capable of intelligent, independent thought that there might be something of "danger" at the end of that link. If they decided to act on their curiosity then that is their own free choice and thus their responsibility.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





