It's what I do.danteshepard wrote...
So it's basically the same shiit you do every tuesday?
All Tali fans, read this! IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP TALI ALIVE! 3.0!!
#74601
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:00
#74602
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:00

I get reminded of this...
#74603
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:00
ca11ahan wrote...
sup guys i have a question. im new 2 the forums but i am wondering how you put those things that say like Tali: By my side and in my heart in Me3 or I support Garrus in Me3.. things like that. how do u get them?
i right-clicked and copied them, then go to forum settings, and paste under your signature
#74604
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
#74605
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
#74606
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
Somebody1003 wrote...
Well when I saw him it was on this thread.videowiz186 wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
He wasnt happy when he did, Ill give ya that.videowiz186 wrote...
If want link, can give. Know when Doctor spoke human.
No. When joined thread.
On side note. Irritated that am not recognized as salarian. Speech has been this way since original thread. Have not spoken "human" since.
Was yelling at arguments.
When Himmelstor joined.
#74607
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
The_KFD_Case wrote...
I not only can absolve Jake, I already have. That your moral compass doesn't agree with mine is a separate matter and not to be confused with the debate at hand.
Fact: Jake provided a worded warning.
Fact: The worded warning was tied to a link leading out of this thread and thus not part of BioWare's forum property.
Fact: No one was forced to click on the link.
Fact: Anyone whom clicked on the link either did so accidentally or through their own free volition.
Fact. If the link was clicked on through own free volition then the responsibility of that immediate action rests with the individual that made that decision and executed the action.
What you are now essentially arguing is that someone else always bears the responsibility. It would be akin to saying that weapons manufacturers are responsible for the acts of individuals whom decide to use their weapons to kill others. Not only is that false, but it also leads to a potentially never ending chain of blaming someone or something else for everything until everyone is included in the blame chain.
I'm seriously considering hiring you as my legal representation
#74608
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...The_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
but u said urself that u dont mind it...therefor it is not a danger to you...unless someone new where the link was going they couldnt be held responsible for wat was posted at the end....and u cant absolve jake for giving them the link...and how does telling them outright that is is porn not better that seems like a far better warning...The_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
he didnt give sufficient warning...sufficient warning would have been something to the effect of: picture cntaining pornographic material.click at own risk... his obscure warning is horrible considering not everyone is bothered by the same material. my warning would have a better chance at not leading someone to be offended by the material depictedThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
people that dont undertsand pron might click on it however so they didnt have sufficient warningThe_KFD_Case wrote...
I didn't mind. You gave proper warning and it was via a link thus no one was forced to see the image in question.
Nonetheless a warning was provided. An individual - barring certain mitigating circumstances - is not absolved of individual initiative and consequent responsibility. "Freedom under responsibility" as the officers and NCOs used to say to us in the Army.
In your opinion. My opinion differs. He provided a warning. That should indicate to any person at least halfway capable of intelligent, independent thought that there might be something of "danger" at the end of that link. If they decided to act on their curiosity then that is their own free choice and thus their responsibility.
lets compare the two...
warning porn here...may offend viewers!!!! mine
warning!!!! urs
it would appear mine is the more informative and thus better...warnings are meant to guide someone away or properly inform them of a potential decsion of taking an action... so because mine was more informative, mine is better...it would appear ither u are blatantly wrong in this area. or you are merely trying to find someway to protect this regardless if it has logic behind it...
I not only can absolve Jake, I already have. That your moral compass doesn't agree with mine is a separate matter and not to be confused with the debate at hand.
Fact: Jake provided a worded warning.
Fact: The worded warning was tied to a link leading out of this thread and thus not part of BioWare's forum property.
Fact: No one was forced to click on the link.
Fact: Anyone whom clicked on the link either did so accidentally or through their own free volition.
Fact. If the link was clicked on through own free volition then the responsibility of that immediate action rests with the individual that made that decision and executed the action.
What you are now essentially arguing is that someone else always bears the responsibility. It would be akin to saying that weapons manufacturers are responsible for the acts of individuals whom decide to use their weapons to kill others. Not only is that false, but it also leads to a potentially never ending chain of blaming someone or something else for everything until everyone is included in the blame chain.
#74609
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
where was this conversation fromsergio71785 wrote...
Zuranamee wrote...
Does anyone have a good picture of Tali and Legion in the squad together on a mission?
Unfortunately it has a subtitle, but maybe you can crop it off for your needs.
[img]http://i483.photobucket.com/albums/rr200/sergio17/MassEffect22010-02-2622-27-37-52.jpg
#74610
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
thanksshnizzler93 wrote...
ca11ahan wrote...
sup guys i have a question. im new 2 the forums but i am wondering how you put those things that say like Tali: By my side and in my heart in Me3 or I support Garrus in Me3.. things like that. how do u get them?
i right-clicked and copied them, then go to forum settings, and paste under your signature
#74611
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:01
ca11ahan wrote...
sup guys i have a question. im new 2 the forums but i am wondering how you put those things that say like Tali: By my side and in my heart in Me3 or I support Garrus in Me3.. things like that. how do u get them?
Signatures?
#74612
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:02
Somebody1003 wrote...
shnizzler93 wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
QFT
perfect
#74613
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:02
looks better every time I see it.videowiz186 wrote...
runescapeguy9 wrote...
trying..4th time...
Wonderful picture.
#74614
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:02
alickar wrote...
where was this conversation from
When you talk to Xen on Tali's loyalty mission.
Legion had commented that attempting to rewrite the Geth was a bad idea. I think it was that anyway.
Modifié par sergio71785, 15 mars 2010 - 10:03 .
#74615
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:03
Speaking of that topic, I must say I'm the most attractive gamer guy in existence.Jake71887 wrote...
Commander Marrek S wrote...
Dude, are you trying to make us sick?Jake71887 wrote...
HK01 wrote...
Pauravi wrote...
1. Jake was posting it.HK01 wrote...
I know the term, but why would I expect actual porn behind it? You care to tell me why I'm supposed to expect porn on a site where pornographic images are against the rules?
2. It was not posted on this site, it was a link to an outside site.
3. He said it was porn.
Fine then, if you all agree that everything can be posted here and that we give a big huge "F*** you!" to Bioware, then so be it.
Better than someone posting a fat tali pic in here imo.
No, if I were trying to do that, I'd post pics of my moobs...
#74616
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:03
sergio71785 wrote...
Zuranamee wrote...
Does anyone have a good picture of Tali and Legion in the squad together on a mission?
*snip*
Unfortunately it has a subtitle, but maybe you can crop it off for your needs.
[img]http://i483.photobucket.com/albums/rr200/sergio17/MassEffect22010-02-2622-27-37-52.jpg
Greatly appreciated. We also like how this one can be cropped to make it appear as if Tali is staring at Legion in a non-violent way.
#74617
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:03
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
#74618
Guest_runescapeguy9_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:03
Guest_runescapeguy9_*
Many more will be on 3000. This is just a teaserOrmagodenator wrote...
looks better every time I see it.videowiz186 wrote...
runescapeguy9 wrote...
trying..4th time...
Wonderful picture.
#74619
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:03
No one forced you to click on the link.TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
#74620
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
not valid argument...merely trying to weasel outJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
#74621
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
I unno, I'm pretty damn handsome...
#74622
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
Commander Marrek S wrote...
Speaking of that topic, I must say I'm the most attractive gamer guy in existence.
Riiiiigggghhhhttttt......
And I'm the ghost of Patrick Swayze... wanna make some pottery together?
#74623
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
Guest_Somebody1003_*
You always seem so upset when you come here...Azint wrote...
No one forced you to click on the link.TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
#74624
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
#74625
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
It's funny to see Legion so uneasy. And to see Tali actually defending Legion.sergio71785 wrote...
alickar wrote...
where was this conversation from
When you talk to Xen on Tali's loyalty mission.
Legion had commented that attempting to rewrite the Geth was a bad idea. I think it was that anyway.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut









