have not seen face=your opinionCommander Marrek S wrote...
Speaking of that topic, I must say I'm the most attractive gamer guy in existence.Jake71887 wrote...
Commander Marrek S wrote...
Dude, are you trying to make us sick?Jake71887 wrote...
HK01 wrote...
Pauravi wrote...
1. Jake was posting it.HK01 wrote...
I know the term, but why would I expect actual porn behind it? You care to tell me why I'm supposed to expect porn on a site where pornographic images are against the rules?
2. It was not posted on this site, it was a link to an outside site.
3. He said it was porn.
Fine then, if you all agree that everything can be posted here and that we give a big huge "F*** you!" to Bioware, then so be it.
Better than someone posting a fat tali pic in here imo.
No, if I were trying to do that, I'd post pics of my moobs...
All Tali fans, read this! IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP TALI ALIVE! 3.0!!
#74626
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
#74627
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
did you not say you were going to stop talk about it?TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not valid argument...merely trying to weasel outJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
#74628
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:04
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
once again not saying that porn should be banned...saying it shouldve had a better warning...i am aware i clicked...not blaming him for thatAzint wrote...
No one forced you to click on the link.TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
#74629
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:05
Jake71887 wrote...
Commander Marrek S wrote...
Speaking of that topic, I must say I'm the most attractive gamer guy in existence.
Riiiiigggghhhhttttt......
And I'm the ghost of Patrick Swayze... wanna make some pottery together?
Confused. Patrick Swayze? Human actor? Must research.
#74630
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:05
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not valid argument...merely trying to weasel outJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
It wasn't an argument, it was words to live by... And I'm still confused why you think everyone is trying to justify or weasel out of something..
#74631
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:05
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
when???danteshepard wrote...
did you not say you were going to stop talk about it?TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not valid argument...merely trying to weasel outJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
#74632
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:05
Was that directed to me? Or to him?Somebody1003 wrote...
You always seem so upset when you come here...Azint wrote...
No one forced you to click on the link.TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
#74633
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:05
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
only accused you and ur defender..to try and expand this upon all of my actions is stupidJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not valid argument...merely trying to weasel outJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
It wasn't an argument, it was words to live by... And I'm still confused why you think everyone is trying to justify or weasel out of something..
#74634
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:05
FsDxRAGE wrote...
can you go back and look at your first post ever?
Yes. Have. Want link?
#74635
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
...OMFG THE ORIGINAL OP POSTED!The Gay Warden wrote...
@ Commander Marrek
I unno, I'm pretty damn handsome...
#74636
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
#74637
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
Guest_Somebody1003_*
You.Azint wrote...
Was that directed to me? Or to him?Somebody1003 wrote...
You always seem so upset when you come here...Azint wrote...
No one forced you to click on the link.TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
It always seems like your mad or sad.
Never just glad.
#74638
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
ca11ahan wrote...
sup guys i have a question. im new 2 the forums but i am wondering how you put those things that say like Tali: By my side and in my heart in Me3 or I support Garrus in Me3.. things like that. how do u get them?
Right click on the one you want and click copy image location.
On the right hand of your screen mouse over Profile
Click on Forum Settings
In the signature box type in [img]
Press control + V
type in [/img1]
delete the number 1
You can generally hold 2 banners in your sig
#74639
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
#74640
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
what?videowiz186 wrote...
FsDxRAGE wrote...
can you go back and look at your first post ever?
Yes. Have. Want link?
#74641
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
Take some antibiotics and head up to the loft?The Gay Warden wrote...
Bah! Order people, let's not argue! What would Tali do?
#74642
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
only accused you and ur defender..to try and expand this upon all of my actions is stupidJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not valid argument...merely trying to weasel outJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
It wasn't an argument, it was words to live by... And I'm still confused why you think everyone is trying to justify or weasel out of something..
Accused of us of what, not giving you adequate warning?
#74643
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
more of a reason to get to 3000runescapeguy9 wrote...
Many more will be on 3000. This is just a teaserOrmagodenator wrote...
looks better every time I see it.videowiz186 wrote...
runescapeguy9 wrote...
trying..4th time...
Wonderful picture.
#74644
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:06
But you are blaming him for that...TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again not saying that porn should be banned...saying it shouldve had a better warning...i am aware i clicked...not blaming him for thatAzint wrote...
No one forced you to click on the link.
He explicitly stated that the link was to a NSFW picture, and you are upset because it lead to a NSFW picture.
#74645
Guest_runescapeguy9_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:07
Guest_runescapeguy9_*
Welcome back.The Gay Warden wrote...
Bah! Order people, let's not argue! What would Tali do?
#74646
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:07
#74647
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:07
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
to replace that with reality:
if jake is looking at porn would it bother me...no
if jake is looking at porn next to me would it bother me...no, maybe make me a lil uncomfortable
if jake gives me a porn magazine with a blank cover and knows i donot like porn and i look at it...yes
this is wat happened not ur situation
But he didn't give you a "blank cover". What he gave you would be the online link equivalent of those non-see through wrapped up adult magazines you find in certain stores which is done to prevent minors from seeing it. In other words, warning was provided. That you still chose to click on it is your responsibility. End of.
Modifié par The_KFD_Case, 15 mars 2010 - 10:20 .
#74648
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:07
The Gay Warden wrote...
Bah! Order people, let's not argue! What would Tali do?
Shoot people with her shotgun?
#74649
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:07
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
exactly...if u have given better warning all of this could have been adverted...Jake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
only accused you and ur defender..to try and expand this upon all of my actions is stupidJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not valid argument...merely trying to weasel outJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
If you always expect the worst, you can only be pleasantly surprised...
It wasn't an argument, it was words to live by... And I'm still confused why you think everyone is trying to justify or weasel out of something..
Accused of us of what, not giving you adequate warning?
#74650
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:07
yeah, sorry i though you said "Wait" instead of "want"FsDxRAGE wrote...
what?videowiz186 wrote...
FsDxRAGE wrote...
can you go back and look at your first post ever?
Yes. Have. Want link?
Modifié par FsDxRAGE, 15 mars 2010 - 10:08 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






