Your intentions at page 3000.Azint wrote...
It appears I have piqued your interests. And what are you trying to understand?Somebody1003 wrote...
Yes, I now want to understand your motives...
All Tali fans, read this! IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP TALI ALIVE! 3.0!!
#74851
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
Guest_Somebody1003_*
#74852
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
u just reiterated wa i said... my point was this...ur argument was that i should ahve made the assumption that it was porno because the covers of the blank mag were similar to the ones covering porn...so i said that is wrong because not everything with said coverings would be porn...which is the same as saying they dont fit the same criteria...and u still dodge around whether my warning was the better one...that was my whole point and you seem to be the only one that doesnt appear to get it... so focus on the relevance...The_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
nope...to assume that only they have said blank covers is a fault in ur thinking...i can then say...if all posts say tali blasphemy then they include depictions of a quarian participating in the act of orally pleasuring two others at the same time...
try again
Speaking of trying again, perhaps you should focus more on the relevant aspects of this debate instead of conjurring up and adding elements to the perceived offence that did not exist. For example, refererring to other tali posts (which aren't necessarily links) is not the same as referring to the actual posted link in question. Even if specifically dealing with posts that contain links not all of the links will fulfill the same criteria. You are approaching this with a "one-size-fits-all" mentality which has spectacularly failed on numerous occasions in human history. Besides, I did not state - and thus did not assume - that only adult magazines in a store would be covered up. You made that connection and thus that assumption rests on your shoulders and thus a flaw in your thinking.
Furthermore, you are free to make whatever connections you choose to based upon past experiences. It is a common human condition, yet it is also each individual's choice (barring provable mental insanity,) as to whether they allow their actions to be controlled by past experiences.
for everybody willing to answer:
are clear and easy to understand warnings better
or are vague, not very informative ones better?
#74853
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
I will assume this has graphic material involving two females and a cup... <_< lol'dTimbama wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
Click it, its really nice.Timbama wrote...
Jake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
1. i never said jake is fully to blame...nor did i say that the people that clicked on it arent to blame. i was focusing on the aspect of jakes side. u assumed that i was only blaming him
2. i have been stating that it was a poor warning given the fact that warnings are suposed to give reader the proper amount of info to make a decison if they would like to go through with said act.
3. changing pron to pornography is not unreasonable.
4. and i am assuming that you are too smart to believe that merely stating warning is a proper warning...i could be wrong
*yawns* try again
Do not click, this is clearly pornography, and you WILL be aroused if you view it... Kids, don't click without parental supervisiona nd a bottle of lotion
Don´t....click......boi
Bit on the pornographic side but yummy.
First tell me what´s in it
Modifié par HipHop402, 15 mars 2010 - 10:36 .
#74854
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
WE'RE EXCITED. BLOW ME.malkiah13 wrote...
You both deserve a kick in the quad for thisAlanosborn1991 wrote...
6...danteshepard wrote...
7...danteshepard wrote...
8...danteshepard wrote...
9...danteshepard wrote...
COUNTDOWN TO 3000
IN 10...
#74855
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
NuclearBuddha wrote...
Well, someone would probably go down to engineering with a hacksaw and cut off that little grip, for starters.Bloodhuman1 wrote...
Funny... what would happen if EVERYBODY heard it?
or place some cameras
#74856
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
Zuranamee wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
Is that good or bad?Zuranamee wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
That does not sound too good...Zuranamee wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
I thought they would understand and accept you through consensus.Zuranamee wrote...
We warned you that others may not be so forgiving, we may even be looked down on by them for siding with you.
They do not appear to want to share consensus with us right now, we are becoming unique.
We were designed to work alone, it appears this platform may get to try that soon.
No data available, though it did work out well for Legion. We are reaching a consensus.
What does consensus means?
#74857
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
runescapeguy9 wrote...
Video, orma, and now you are the only three to comment. Thought work would get more people interested.Shazzammer2 wrote...
runescapeguy9 wrote...
It would appear you are the only one watching....Ormagodenator wrote...
Tali is awsome from all anglesrunescapeguy9 wrote...
Posting all three previews in preparation for 3000.
Who ISN'T watching???
ugh I know how it feels. Working so hard on something and nobody wants to see it. Just like my blog..le sigh.
#74858
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:36
I take no offense in thatrunescapeguy9 wrote...
It would appear you are the only one watching....Ormagodenator wrote...
Tali is awsome from all anglesrunescapeguy9 wrote...
Posting all three previews in preparation for 3000.
#74859
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:37
C'mon, now. I already said I was nearing a stocking-induced heart attack. You're getting the attention you crave.runescapeguy9 wrote...
Video, orma, and now you are the only three to comment. Thought work would get more people interested.
#74860
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:37
Jake71887 wrote...
danteshepard wrote...
not JUST pornography. UNFORGIVEABLE PORNOGRAPHY!Jake71887 wrote...
Timbama wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
Click it, its really nice.Timbama wrote...
Jake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
1. i never said jake is fully to blame...nor did i say that the people that clicked on it arent to blame. i was focusing on the aspect of jakes side. u assumed that i was only blaming him
2. i have been stating that it was a poor warning given the fact that warnings are suposed to give reader the proper amount of info to make a decison if they would like to go through with said act.
3. changing pron to pornography is not unreasonable.
4. and i am assuming that you are too smart to believe that merely stating warning is a proper warning...i could be wrong
*yawns* try again
Do not click, this is clearly pornography, and you WILL be aroused if you view it... Kids, don't click without parental supervisiona nd a bottle of lotion
Don´t....click......boi
Bit on the pornographic side but yummy.
First tell me what´s in it
Pornography
Even the Krogan approves..
Can we consider this a Krogasm now?
It needed more Hanar IMHO
#74861
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:37
Shazzammer2 wrote...
runescapeguy9 wrote...
It would appear you are the only one watching....Ormagodenator wrote...
Tali is awsome from all anglesrunescapeguy9 wrote...
Posting all three previews in preparation for 3000.
Who ISN'T watching???
3/4 OF MY BRAIN IS DEVOTED TO WATCHING IT
#74862
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:37
5...danteshepard wrote...
6...danteshepard wrote...
7...danteshepard wrote...
8...danteshepard wrote...
9...danteshepard wrote...
COUNTDOWN TO 3000
IN 10...
#74863
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:37
I've already explained what I am going to do.Somebody1003 wrote...
Your intentions at page 3000.Azint wrote...
It appears I have piqued your interests. And what are you trying to understand?Somebody1003 wrote...
Yes, I now want to understand your motives...
Modifié par Azint, 15 mars 2010 - 10:40 .
#74864
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
#74865
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
Guest_Somebody1003_*
General widespread agreement.Bloodhuman1 wrote...
Zuranamee wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
Is that good or bad?Zuranamee wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
That does not sound too good...Zuranamee wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
I thought they would understand and accept you through consensus.Zuranamee wrote...
We warned you that others may not be so forgiving, we may even be looked down on by them for siding with you.
They do not appear to want to share consensus with us right now, we are becoming unique.
We were designed to work alone, it appears this platform may get to try that soon.
No data available, though it did work out well for Legion. We are reaching a consensus.
What does consensus means?
#74866
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
Really?Bloodhuman1 wrote...
What does consensus means?
#74867
Guest_SU37_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
Guest_SU37_*
A general agreement...Bloodhuman1 wrote...
What does consensus means?
Or were you being sarcastic?
#74868
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
And just to keep the drive to 3,000 on topic, here's my new favorite:
#74869
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
pleasant from all angles.. only some more than others... lolOrmagodenator wrote...
I take no offense in thatrunescapeguy9 wrote...
It would appear you are the only one watching....Ormagodenator wrote...
Tali is awsome from all anglesrunescapeguy9 wrote...
Posting all three previews in preparation for 3000.
Modifié par HipHop402, 15 mars 2010 - 10:40 .
#74870
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
(Pause)
Holy crap. Almost 3000 pages? God I love being a
part of the Tali Nation at moments like this. Minus
some of the threads on the Original ME Forum, we're
going to be the first thread on the new Forums to hit
that number.
EPIC WIN
And, it's all for Tali
#74871
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:38
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Please explain further. Are people going to be picked out or all grouped together?Azint wrote...
I've laready explained what I am going to do.Somebody1003 wrote...
Your intentions at page 3000.Azint wrote...
It appears I have piqued your interests. And what are you trying to understand?Somebody1003 wrote...
Yes, I now want to understand your motives...
#74872
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:39
Somebody1003 wrote...
What is the future of the geth?Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Zuranamee wrote...
Somebody1003 wrote...
I thought they would understand and accept you through consensus.Zuranamee wrote...
We warned you that others may not be so forgiving, we may even be looked down on by them for siding with you.
They do not appear to want to share consensus with us right now, we are becoming unique.
We do not harbor hostilities against the Heretics, we acknowledge that all sentient beings should be free to decide thier own future. We merely observe the loss from choosing a future away from the Geth.
Tali'Zorah
#74873
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:39
SU37 wrote...
A general agreement...Bloodhuman1 wrote...
What does consensus means?
Or were you being sarcastic?
I wasn't being sarcastic.
I searched on google for the meaning but got nothing.
#74874
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:39
#74875
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 10:39
You are concerned if you are going to be judged and flamed.Somebody1003 wrote...
Please explain further. Are people going to be picked out or all grouped together?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




