TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
The_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
once again u have not said why my warning was not better....this whole time i have said that the warning should be better to properly inform....and i did not say that it was entirely anyones fault...it is both the people who clicked and jake or posting it...and once again not all sites lead to porn...for you to assume that we assume that all sites do so is a flaw in ur logic...ty using concrete eveidence next time...i pity you...
Because this is not about your preferred warning. It's about the facts at hand which included the actually stated warning. That you continue to insist on trying to move the proverbial goal posts during the middle of a game is unfortunate and disingenuous. Furthermore, now you are changing your tone and trying to make it seem more reasonable by assiging some blame to each side which was not your initial charge. Initially you placed all fault squarely on Jake's shoulders. Please make up your mind instead of flip-flopping back and forth.
Speaking of assumptions, you have just assumed that I assumed that everyone knew what "pron" related to. I have not stated such a thing. You appear to be confusing my comments with that of several other posters on this thread. I suggest you get your so-called "facts" straight before you try to present them as such. Otherwise you just look silly and wrong when called on it like I just did to you now. 
1. i never said jake is fully to blame...nor did i say that the people that clicked on it arent to blame. i was focusing on the aspect of jakes side. u assumed that i was only blaming him
2. i have been stating that it was a poor warning given the fact that warnings are suposed to give reader the proper amount of info to make a decison if they would like to go through with said act.
3. changing pron to pornography is not unreasonable.
4. and i am assuming that you are too smart to believe that merely stating warning is a proper warning...i could be wrong
*yawns* try again
lol! Now you are just lying young man. When you have enough respect for your own word to be truthful and accept responsibility for your own actions, both past and present, feel free to bring up the discussion again.
2) This has already been covered. Please re-read previous posts I've made on the matter. Read as many times as required.
3) Conversely using the good ol' grey matter to consider that a link with a clearly labeled warning online leading to "pron" may refer to "pornography" is not unreasonable either.
4) Nice try at making me seem unsmart if I don't agree with your fourth point. However it runs afoul of what is referred to as "begging the question" and thus is part of the established "list of fallacies". On the bright side, if you can acknowledge that you are assuming things then perhaps there is still hope for you regarding the actual topic matter.
You're going to have to do better than that sonny boy.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
