Why are you so convinced this is a charade Revan? Is it not possible that he is sincere? That he actually does have an interest in you?RevanKun123 wrote...
danteshepard wrote...
relax man. as funny as that analogy is you gotta stop picking on her. tell her how you feel. deep down man! you can do this!Jake71887 wrote...
I'm about as subtle as an elephant in a porn shoot...
Enough with this ridiculous charade !
All Tali fans, read this! IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP TALI ALIVE! 3.0!!
#75326
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:48
#75327
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:48
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
thsoe are site rules and ur on their site...and this isnt about banning..this is about whether its allowed or not and my quote clearly states it is...Jake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
No Topics of an illicit or illegal nature. Warez, software piracy, illegal activites, pornography, posting copyrighted material or scans of such material, etc. are not welcome here and will be removed without warning. Posters of such material will be dealt with on a case by case basis. A person or persons found to discuss such matters may be banned from these forums at the discretion of the staffJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
it says o porn thus no porn...no means noJake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
omg...just checked forum rules...said no porn allowed...hmmm..this would lead me to believe that my assumtion that it was not porn was based in logic...regardless of the m rating of the game
That's a vast oversimplification of what the forum rules are... Grats
Stop paraphrasing and post a direct quote...
First of all, that's not in the EA ToS, nor am I creating a topic involving those...
And secondly, not everything that is vulgar is deemed severe enough to report to EA
"In general, reporting content to EA (which is what that button does) should be a last resort - for most things, it is generally a better first step to let one of the BioWare employees or community moderators know about it first. EA will potentially bring in lawyers or local police, at which point you may regret the escalation.
The following are always valid reasons for official customer service investigation:
child solicitation
terrorist threats
game client hacks (someone using a hacked version of a game to upload inappropriate content)
extreme harassment (i.e. "needs a restraining order")
hate speech (racism, death threats against a group, etc)
The following are sometimes valid reasons to report content to EA, depending on severity/circumstances:
violent/vulgar content or language
plagiarism
spamming via email or PM
offensive display names
"
#75328
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:48
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
with the knowledge that th rules are there i can assume people will abide by them...1490 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
but with that knowledge in tow it should be safe to assume that the link wouldnt go to porn...hence my argument for properly labeling it porn is valid1490 wrote...
Yes, it does. That's why I said "while certain sites have rules prohibiting certain content," meaning that this site prohibits it. I'm not saying that posting a link to pornographic material is right or that's it's not against the rules, but rules do not protect you completely. Stealing is illegal, people still do it. That's why you lock your doors and avoid carrying around large wads of cash. It's common sense: you have to expect bad content to be a click away on the internet.
Wait...with the knowledge that rules won't prevent all pornographic links from being posted, it's safe to assume the link *wouldn't* go to porn? I'm not sure I understand....
If you think the internet is a safe place where people will always follow the rules, you might want to reconsider your perspective. I don't know how long you have been talking on forums, but I'm sorry to say you're going to be shocked, offended, and disappointed many more times if you keep up that assumption.
#75329
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:48
danteshepard wrote...
We're trying to help jake and revan get together. Wanna help?Ormagodenator wrote...
whats going on,
ive been gone for a few minutes?
Honestly, havn't you all worked out Jake and Revan are the same person?!
Modifié par Daskworx, 15 mars 2010 - 11:49 .
#75330
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:48
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
#75331
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:48
RevanKun123 wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Actually I was going to reccomend either ignoring Jake completely or going on the offensive and not giving him time for a smart ass remark.RevanKun123 wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Would you mind if I recomend an idea Revan?
If it's about to "shot myself with a shotgun or hang myself" I have already thought about it.
I better ignore him.
Or you could stop being so uptight and laugh once ina while? That works...
#75332
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:49
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
#75333
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:49
Ormagodenator wrote...
I don't see how I can helpdanteshepard wrote...
We're trying to help jack and revan get together. Wanna help?Ormagodenator wrote...
whats going on,
ive been gone for a few minutes?
No Matter what : Don't do anything !
#75334
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:49
#75335
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:49
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
ur first para i concur with and will rightly apologize for it...
can u direct me to said pages...not in a snide manner.. but peple usually will recall events in their own perception so it would be better for u to give me them to drag them up(also, he posted somehting elselewd which i did not argue against and even praised him for doing so...)
and lastly,i am dissatisfied with the warning...a warning was provided...i do not dispute that... i merely stated, or it was my intention to do so, that the warning could have been clearer than it was so the less informed , like myself, would not have too see it... i do not think it unreasonable to have changed the word pron to porn...
Jake's initial link post took place on page 2972. You then commented that not everyone might know the meaning of "pron" which raises the question as to whether you actually were one of those people or not? If not then it runs contrary to one of your latter arguments.
Things steadily pick up from there.
On page 2975 you state the following:
"he didnt give sufficient warning...sufficient warning would have been
something to the effect of: picture cntaining pornographic
material.click at own risk... his obscure warning is horrible
considering not everyone is bothered by the same material. my warning
would have a better chance at not leading someone to be offended by the
material depicted"
Page 2975 of this thread.
Thus you placed the blame squarely on him and tried to assert your own wants/desires for what would be considered sufficient warning. Regardless, an explicit warning was provided.
#75336
Guest_Rakia_Time_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:49
Guest_Rakia_Time_*
#75337
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:49
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
thsoe are site rules and ur on their site...and this isnt about banning..this is about whether its allowed or not and my quote clearly states it is...
If it wasn't allowed, then the content would be removed, and I would be banned... Simple
#75338
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:50
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
She hasn't laughed since she saw a puppy get beat to death with a tire iron...(just a theory)Jake71887 wrote...
RevanKun123 wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Actually I was going to reccomend either ignoring Jake completely or going on the offensive and not giving him time for a smart ass remark.RevanKun123 wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Would you mind if I recomend an idea Revan?
If it's about to "shot myself with a shotgun or hang myself" I have already thought about it.
I better ignore him.
Or you could stop being so uptight and laugh once ina while? That works...
#75339
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:50
Rakia_Time wrote...
You know, i thought this was a Tali thread, not a thread were everyone is talking about how perverted Jake is
what a way to celebrate 3000 eh?
#75340
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:50
Rakia_Time wrote...
You know, i thought this was a Tali thread, not a thread were everyone is talking about how perverted Jake is
Yea I get that confused sometimes. I've just simply given up caring anymore. Its hard to follow the silliness.
#75341
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:50
pornography should not be posted directally to the forums,Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Jake's trying to seduce Revan and failing...hardOrmagodenator wrote...
whats going on,
ive been gone for a few minutes?
and there's a debate about Bioware's rules in regards to pornography on the forums
in summary nothing out of the ordinary.
but posting a link should be OK to an extente.
#75343
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:51
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not flip flopping and the point of one was to show you that u assue also when u have been so keen on saying you dontThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
1. the s in she is a typo...go back and look in other posts and you will see evidence that i know u are of the male gender...nice ASSUMPTION however...good to see u using the ol noodleThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
malkiah13 wrote...
My two sense for the whole "oh jake didn't warn me enough" crap. Its what jake does. He posts stuff like that. It doesn't matter if his warning was vague; if you've been here for like, a freaking day, then that should be all you need to decide if you wanna look or not. Besides, its just a picture. You'll live
i have been here for a day and that was the first time he put said link...aslo, his past actions are not an exscuse for his current ones.lastly, this could all end if kfd will admit that she is wrong
1) I'm a "he" not a she. There you go assuming things again. Funny how that works since you appear so eager to accuse others of the same thing.
2) As for ending this for being "wrong", right back at ya. I've backed up my arguments based on the facts. You have tried to back yours up based on hyperbole. Since you seem incapable of persuading me that leaves you with one other option: Empirically prove I'm wrong. That is unlikely given the circumstances since the facts are that a clear warning was provided. That you didn't think it was sufficient warning is a matter of personal taste which there is no accounting for.
2. if neither of us can provide sufficient evidence then this will never be more than a draw... and the fact that u think that it was a proper enough warning and i think the opposite is a matter of opinion... so neither of us is "wrong"
I see. So what you are saying is that I should have known what you were referring to because it has been established as common knowledge previously. That is the exact same logic that others have used when explaining the "pron" part of the warning in Jake's link. Isn't it wonderful when we are in agreement?
This isn't a draw, but if it makes you feel better in the morning feel free to pretend thus. If you want to avoid embarrassment such as this in the future I recommend sticking to the clear facts and carefully choosing your words once you have clearly thought through the argument you wish to pursue. Then stick with it. Flip flopping all over the place doesn't help.
And in doing so you shoot yourself in the foot. Unfortunate. Besides, I've stuck to the empirical facts.
#75344
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:51
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
She hasn't laughed since she saw a puppy get beat to death with a tire iron...(just a theory)Jake71887 wrote...
RevanKun123 wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Actually I was going to reccomend either ignoring Jake completely or going on the offensive and not giving him time for a smart ass remark.RevanKun123 wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Would you mind if I recomend an idea Revan?
If it's about to "shot myself with a shotgun or hang myself" I have already thought about it.
I better ignore him.
Or you could stop being so uptight and laugh once ina while? That works...
Thats too Elfin Lied. But that was a vase I think.
#75345
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:51
Rakia_Time wrote...
You know, i thought this was a Tali thread, not a thread were everyone is talking about how perverted Jake is
Even the other group of Talimancers talk about that, why would you think this group is any different?
Anyway, House is coming on soon.. gotta go!
#75346
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:51
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Alright everyone you get to pick 5 characters from any other Bioware game to be on your team in ME3 who are they?
Tali, Garrus, Fem!Revan, Fem!Exile, Bastila for my squad. Two pimps (counting Male!Shep) and four babes.
#75347
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:51
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
once again how does this apply??? is it or is it not a logical conclusion to believe that either A. there will be no porn cuz the rules or B. people will label things as such if they do post it...and im asking if its logical...not the most logical...1490 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
with the knowledge that th rules are there i can assume people will abide by them...1490 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
but with that knowledge in tow it should be safe to assume that the link wouldnt go to porn...hence my argument for properly labeling it porn is valid1490 wrote...
Yes, it does. That's why I said "while certain sites have rules prohibiting certain content," meaning that this site prohibits it. I'm not saying that posting a link to pornographic material is right or that's it's not against the rules, but rules do not protect you completely. Stealing is illegal, people still do it. That's why you lock your doors and avoid carrying around large wads of cash. It's common sense: you have to expect bad content to be a click away on the internet.
Wait...with the knowledge that rules won't prevent all pornographic links from being posted, it's safe to assume the link *wouldn't* go to porn? I'm not sure I understand....
If you think the internet is a safe place where people will always follow the rules, you might want to reconsider your perspective. I don't know how long you have been talking on forums, but I'm sorry to say you're going to be shocked, offended, and disappointed many more times if you keep up that assumption.
#75348
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:51
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Alright everyone you get to pick 5 characters from any other Bioware game to be on your team in ME3 who are they?
Really?! Sweet. Um....
Mission Vao. Scholar Ling. The Handmaiden. Sharwyn. And...Canderous Ordo.
#75349
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:52
Jake71887 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
thsoe are site rules and ur on their site...and this isnt about banning..this is about whether its allowed or not and my quote clearly states it is...
If it wasn't allowed, then the content would be removed, and I would be banned... Simple
if your complaining over pointless crap liek this join this group and stop complaining http://social.bioware.com/group/1680/
#75350
Posté 15 mars 2010 - 11:52




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






