Somebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
Nah, I went through ME1 with full paragon not romancing anyone, saving it for Tali, I dont want ANYTHING BAD to happen lololol
All Tali fans, read this! IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP TALI ALIVE! 3.0!!
Débuté par
TheSorrow1175
, févr. 18 2010 08:49
-
Ce sujet est fermé
- Show only BioWare posts
#75551
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:37
Chim3ra
-
- Members
- 479 messages
Nah, I went through ME1 with full paragon not romancing anyone, saving it for Tali, I dont want ANYTHING BAD to happen lololol
Retour en haut
#75552
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:37
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
-
- Guests
It's not cheating if your ME1 LI has become a revenge obsessed, unfeeling, nerf herder!Somebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
#75553
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:38
sergio71785
-
- Members
- 12 202 messages
Somebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?
Not technically, but hearing Tali thank me for treating her well on the Normandy was more meaningful than anything from those other LIs. <3
EDIT: Actually, I misread the original post. Ignore this.
Modifié par sergio71785, 16 mars 2010 - 12:38 .
#75554
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:38
Sleepicub09
-
- Members
- 3 928 messages
#75555
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:38
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Guest_Somebody1003_*
-
- Guests
Ya could redo ME1 without a LI.LegendaryAvenger wrote...
I romanced liara and tali with the same characterSomebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.now I'm going to have to break liara's heart in ME3. CURSE YOU BIOWARE!
I want to cheat on Ashley.
Modifié par Somebody1003, 16 mars 2010 - 12:38 .
#75556
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:39
Collider
-
- Members
- 17 165 messages
All we really know about Tali's appearance is that she has two eyes, a nose, and lips. Eyelids too I believe. There's some other stuff we can gather hints from but no definites. I believe Pauravi posted a link of a fan's concept of the quarian physique that fit this criteria yet looked very different from a human.
#75557
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:39
Shazzammer2
-
- Members
- 4 199 messages
Felipe 058 wrote...
http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/sergio71785 wrote...
Remember when TIM gave everyone on the Normandy 300 credits? And Shepard decided he'd buy 100 cups of coffee with it?
Then during that celebratory party on the Citadel, Jacob accidently came smashing in on the stilts he bought, which sent Legion's expensive cigar flying and it set the whole place on fire.
Just then Shepard finished his 100th cup of coffee, and went into this permanent adrenaline rush, and was able to put out the fire and rescue everyone.
Then Tali was all "Is it just me or were we ust saved by mysterious blur?"
And then they proceeded to eat Turkey Dogs that Mordin had bought. Well, except Tali and Garrus.
wait....what will happen if i press the button?!?!
:blink:
#75558
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:39
danteshepard
-
- Members
- 2 007 messages
why? are you a fan too?Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
danteshepard wrote...
I don't care what other people say, Sonic is kickass. even the new games. Can't wait for Sonic 4 on 360.Sleepicub09 wrote...
LOL I forgot about that sonic gamedanteshepard wrote...
to the bioware discussion:
Sonic
Shadow
Tails
Knuckles
Eleanor Lamb
#75559
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:39
Angelraid
-
- Members
- 1 134 messages
Chim3ra wrote...
You guys remember the conversation you can overhear when in The Asari World ( Illos I think?) where when you go behind a quarian and a turian talking how they start talking about how a human and quarians amino acids don't match or something so does that mean no smexy time? =( ( NO ALL U DID WAS MAKE-OUT IN ME2)
appearently you need to wear a condom. Although the reaction couldn't be too dangerous since the can kiss humans wich would result in similar cross fluid contact. perhaps going natural can cuase a rash or something similar.
#75560
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:39
GMR25
-
- Members
- 1 929 messages
LegendaryAvenger wrote...
I romanced liara and tali with the same characterSomebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
Nothing beats being a heartbreaker.
#75561
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:40
Ormagodenator
-
- Members
- 2 577 messages
you can always restart ME1,LegendaryAvenger wrote...
I romanced liara and tali with the same characterSomebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
I would'nt just to see what happens in ME3.
#75562
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:40
Commander Marrek S
-
- Members
- 941 messages
The only other person I'd romance other than Tali would be Kasumi...LOL
#75563
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:40
shnizzler93
-
- Members
- 1 637 messages
LegendaryAvenger wrote...
I romanced liara and tali with the same characterSomebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
fail on my part
Modifié par shnizzler93, 16 mars 2010 - 12:40 .
#75564
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:40
Angelraid
-
- Members
- 1 134 messages
danteshepard wrote...
why? are you a fan too?Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
danteshepard wrote...
I don't care what other people say, Sonic is kickass. even the new games. Can't wait for Sonic 4 on 360.Sleepicub09 wrote...
LOL I forgot about that sonic gamedanteshepard wrote...
to the bioware discussion:
Sonic
Shadow
Tails
Knuckles
Eleanor Lamb
Well I dont have all the sonic games for genisis sitting next to my television or anything. There all on the storage shelf.
#75565
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:40
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
-
- Guests
1.opinionThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
no u havent stuck to them...read my simplified version so you can understandThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not flip flopping and the point of one was to show you that u assue also when u have been so keen on saying you dontThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
1. the s in she is a typo...go back and look in other posts and you will see evidence that i know u are of the male gender...nice ASSUMPTION however...good to see u using the ol noodleThe_KFD_Case wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
malkiah13 wrote...
My two sense for the whole "oh jake didn't warn me enough" crap. Its what jake does. He posts stuff like that. It doesn't matter if his warning was vague; if you've been here for like, a freaking day, then that should be all you need to decide if you wanna look or not. Besides, its just a picture. You'll live
i have been here for a day and that was the first time he put said link...aslo, his past actions are not an exscuse for his current ones.lastly, this could all end if kfd will admit that she is wrong
1) I'm a "he" not a she. There you go assuming things again. Funny how that works since you appear so eager to accuse others of the same thing.
2) As for ending this for being "wrong", right back at ya. I've backed up my arguments based on the facts. You have tried to back yours up based on hyperbole. Since you seem incapable of persuading me that leaves you with one other option: Empirically prove I'm wrong. That is unlikely given the circumstances since the facts are that a clear warning was provided. That you didn't think it was sufficient warning is a matter of personal taste which there is no accounting for.
2. if neither of us can provide sufficient evidence then this will never be more than a draw... and the fact that u think that it was a proper enough warning and i think the opposite is a matter of opinion... so neither of us is "wrong"
I see. So what you are saying is that I should have known what you were referring to because it has been established as common knowledge previously. That is the exact same logic that others have used when explaining the "pron" part of the warning in Jake's link. Isn't it wonderful when we are in agreement?
This isn't a draw, but if it makes you feel better in the morning feel free to pretend thus. If you want to avoid embarrassment such as this in the future I recommend sticking to the clear facts and carefully choosing your words once you have clearly thought through the argument you wish to pursue. Then stick with it. Flip flopping all over the place doesn't help.
And in doing so you shoot yourself in the foot. Unfortunate. Besides, I've stuck to the empirical facts.
comes down to :
1.there was a warning
2.people saw it who didnt want to
3.which means either they didnt read carefully or it wasnt properly labeled...
4.label said pron not porn...doesnt seem properly labeled...and the warning sign could lend credence o opposng arguments...
5. site rules: No Topics of an illicit or illegal nature. Warez, software piracy, illegal activites, pornography, posting copyrighted material or scans of such material, etc. are not welcome here and will be removed without warning. Posters of such material will be dealt with on a case by case basis. A person or persons found to discuss such matters may be banned from these forums at the discretion of the staff
6. site rules can lead one to assume that it is something else other than porn because porns not allowed...
7.it was porn
8. if properly labeled this could have been adverted
1) Yes there was a warning and thus Jake's post lived up to reasonable responsibility.
2) People were not forced to see what the link led to. If they saw it they either clicked on the link by accident or intentionally. In the former case it is no one's fault per se. In the latter case responsibility rests with the individual carrying out the action of his/her own free will.
3) If they didn't read the warning carefully then that too is their responsibility otherwise any form of labeled warning would be meaningless. A full warning label was provided. That you don't like it doesn't change that fact.
4) Your arguments have done nothing to remove the individual responsibility of each person who has freely chosen to click on that link.
5) I didn't see anything violate those rules. I saw a link with a clear warning label on it. Please explain how that violates the ToS.
6) Whatever a person assumes is not the responsibility of another unless it can be established that intentional deceit and misleading information was provided. That is not the case in this instance. Also note that thinking for oneself is allowed.
7) It was a link or do you consider the words "Blasphemous Tali Pron - Click at your own risk" to be porno as understood by the visual media that it is?
8) It was properly labelled as a potentially dangerous sign. If you were unsure about what it might link to you had the option of inquiring further.
2.doenst absolve him from the fac that he created the circumstances
3.matter of opinion to whether it was clear...
4.not trying to
5.once again opinion and he did post porn
6.not clear info so he is responsible to an extent
7. it was a link to said media...just as bad...only slimy lawyers would think of trying to use such a bad loop hole
8.inquiring would be safe route...but that would lead him to saying it was porn which would have labled it to all and gone my route anyway
#75566
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:40
AventuroLegendary
-
- Members
- 7 146 messages
no thanks. after playing ME1 7 times, I know what I'm talking aboutSomebody1003 wrote...
Ya could redo ME1 without a LI.LegendaryAvenger wrote...
I romanced liara and tali with the same characterSomebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
I want to cheat on Ashley.
#75567
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:40
Chim3ra
-
- Members
- 479 messages
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Chim3ra wrote...
You guys remember the conversation you can overhear when in The Asari World ( Illos I think?) where when you go behind a quarian and a turian talking how they start talking about how a human and quarians amino acids don't match or something so does that mean no smexy time? =( ( NO ALL U DID WAS MAKE-OUT IN ME2)
appearently you need to wear a condom. Although the reaction couldn't be too dangerous since the can kiss humans wich would result in similar cross fluid contact. perhaps going natural can cuase a rash or something similar.
I'd take that rash in a heartbeat.
#75568
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:41
The_KFD_Case
-
- Members
- 5 708 messages
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
u admitted iwas right ******. i said logical not the most logical...by you stating but not entirely "logical u have admitted that there is some logic to be found...1490 wrote...
I did answer your questions: it applies because this thread is part of the internet, and it's "probable" that most people will label things, but not entirely "logical" because many people do not, and then I gave you an explanation. I also didn't say the entire internet was bad, just like I wouldn't say the world is bad. But both have bad parts, and to wander either believing nothing bad can happen to you, or thinking you will have a clear warning before something does, is naive.
And you just used a personal attach which is also in violation of the ToS that you so dearly love to quote. Also, it is extremely poor form to do such with such blatantly crass language in such an obvious manner. Also, please point out where 1490 admits that you are right? You sir, fail at debating. Well done!
#75569
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:41
danteshepard
-
- Members
- 2 007 messages
It's called snipping your quotes. DO IT!
#75570
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:41
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Guest_Somebody1003_*
-
- Guests
Oh god darth you love this.Darth Cheesecake wrote...
It's not cheating if your ME1 LI has become a revenge obsessed, unfeeling, nerf herder!Somebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
#75572
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:42
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
Guest_TGFKAMAdmaX_*
-
- Guests
and not disputing whther or not to be careful with clicking...saying IF properly labeled peoplecould ahve made an informed decision1490 wrote...
TGFKAMAdmaX wrote...
not arguing whther it should have...u dont kno wat hindsight bias is do u? it is when u already know the resulting consequence of an action and try to use that in an argument about said action before it was taken... i m saying BEFORE HE POSTED IT he should have properly labeled it so people would know wat they were clicking....u are taking into account the kowledge of wat it was and therefor ur entire argument is once again: INVALID1490 wrote...
You're having an argument in a public forum where anyone is allowed to post: if you were really concerned about the need for privacy in your argument with KFD, you should have taken it to PM rather than continue posting here where everyone could see it.
I don't need logic or moral ground to prove my argument, because it's already been proven: a pornographic link was posted, you clicked on it without considering the consequences, and you were offended. What you are saying should never have happened despite the rules set in place, happened. You can argue with me all day whether or not it SHOULD have been posted in the first place, but that was never my intended point. I think that everyone surfing the internet, whether it be google or Bioware social network, needs to take responsibility for their own safety by watching what they click on.
I don't need to convince you of my point either, because if you are so determined to be right that you ignore what I'm saying and attack me rather than having a polite discussion, there is obviously nothing I can do to win, so I cede to you. However, I guarantee if you keep your current attitude of nonresponsibility when surfing the internet, you WILL be offended again. Don't take my word for it: just keep clicking on links and see what happens.
someone post some more pics to better give him this info
Yes, and I'm saying that maybe you should have been more careful clicking on a suspcious link so the resulting consequence didn't happen: you getting offended. My point was never to say whether or not he should have labeled it better; it's that people should be careful what they click on when they're online.
#75573
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:42
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Guest_Somebody1003_*
-
- Guests
Only when its to Ashley though.GMR25 wrote...
LegendaryAvenger wrote...
I romanced liara and tali with the same characterSomebody1003 wrote...
Did ya romance anyone in ME1?Chim3ra wrote...
MMMM...I like quarians.
#75574
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:43
Felipe 058
-
- Members
- 603 messages
Their DNAs are made up from the same dextro-amino acids, but their DNA structures are entirely different. I honestly mean no offense, but did you take high school biology? The DNA of a monkey and a bird are made up of the same amino acids, but that does not mean that a monkey and a bird can mate. It all comes down to the quarians' and turians' chromosomes. It is virtually guaranteed that the alleles on their chromosomes, in fact the chromosomes themselves, serve different functions; therefore it would be like trying to breed a monkey with a bird: impossible.LegendaryAvenger wrote...
Hey guys. Since quarians have the same dna structure as turians, can they breed with them?
#75575
Posté 16 mars 2010 - 12:43
Commander Marrek S
-
- Members
- 941 messages
Tali after romance: I'm running a high fever, have who-knows-what in my sinuses, and a slight cough. But you were worth it!
