Aller au contenu

Photo

All Tali fans, read this! IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP TALI ALIVE! 3.0!!


137512 réponses à ce sujet

#88751
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*

Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
  • Guests
Image IPB



Fix'd.

#88752
Shazzammer2

Shazzammer2
  • Members
  • 4 199 messages
Image IPB

#88753
SirEmilCrane

SirEmilCrane
  • Members
  • 5 793 messages

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Flaargman117 wrote...

It won't make the images go away, but... Apology accepted anyway. How can you turn down Garrus? Besides if I wanted to I could just get him killed on the suicide mission.Image IPB


I kindly ask you to go f*ck yourself. :ph34r:


Garrus does not die! Garrus cannot die!

#88754
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*

Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
  • Guests

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.

And Renegades won't let anything get in the way of the mission.

#88755
Phil725

Phil725
  • Members
  • 7 461 messages

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.


There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault.  There could be millions of reapers for all we know.  I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way.  Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.

#88756
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*

Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
  • Guests

Darth Cheesecake wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.

And Renegades won't let anything get in the way of the mission.


That's right!

Have a puppy!

Image IPB

#88757
Alphyn

Alphyn
  • Members
  • 6 561 messages

Flaargman117 wrote...

This story is lookin' good Alphyn-my-boy, lookin' good.Image IPB

I didn't write it. :P

#88758
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*

Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
  • Guests

Phil725 wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.


There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault.  There could be millions of reapers for all we know.  I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way.  Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.


Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.

Modifié par DrathanGervaise, 21 mars 2010 - 12:10 .


#88759
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*

Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
  • Guests

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Darth Cheesecake wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.

And Renegades won't let anything get in the way of the mission.


That's right!

Have a puppy!

Image IPB

OMFG A PUPPY YAY! You made my day Drathan!:)

#88760
GeeMunkey

GeeMunkey
  • Members
  • 284 messages
Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis  (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.

Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?

#88761
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*

Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
  • Guests

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.


There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault.  There could be millions of reapers for all we know.  I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way.  Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.


Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.

Only a Paragon deals in absoluets.

#88762
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*

Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
  • Guests

GeeMunkey wrote...

Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis  (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.

Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?


Patrick Stewart plays Saren's father.

He wouldn't be a villain though, because that's over the line.

#88763
SirEmilCrane

SirEmilCrane
  • Members
  • 5 793 messages

GeeMunkey wrote...

Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis  (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.

Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?


We're due a human villian, probably a cerberus officer working for TIM

#88764
Flaargman117

Flaargman117
  • Members
  • 1 233 messages

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Flaargman117 wrote...

It won't make the images go away, but... Apology accepted anyway. How can you turn down Garrus? Besides if I wanted to I could just get him killed on the suicide mission.Image IPB


I kindly ask you to go f*ck yourself. :ph34r:

I said if I wanted to...Image IPB

He's my favourite character next to Tali.

#88765
The_KFD_Case

The_KFD_Case
  • Members
  • 5 708 messages

shnizzler93 wrote...

how is DA:O-Awakening?


I haven't bought it nor played it. I was looking forward to it but have decided to cool my heels and here's why:

1) No romance plots. At all.
2) All of your party members from DA:O leave. Only one returns (I can inform you whom that is if you wish).
3) None of your DLC armors and weapons from DA:O are transferred to "Awakening" except from the armour and weapons you got from the Warden's Keep DLC.
4) The bonus Blood Powers you can get from the Warden's Keep appear to be malfunctioning at present time.
5) Depending on what sort of play style you have, you may be able to complete "Awakening" in 12 hours or less. That's not bad for an expansion pack IMO (it beats many full game releases out there today - I'm looking at you CoD games!) but it appears that the replayability level for "Awakening" may not be as expansive as it is for DA:O.
6) Given the above factors combined with the current pricing level compared to what the full DA:O costs now and upon release, I'm not convinced that it's a sound "bang-for-buck" setup.

#88766
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*

Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
  • Guests

GeeMunkey wrote...

Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis  (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.

Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?

Patrick Stewart..He'll play the real Reaper leader!

#88767
Guest_runescapeguy9_*

Guest_runescapeguy9_*
  • Guests

GeeMunkey wrote...

Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis  (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.

Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?

Patrick Stewart...
:?

#88768
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*

Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
  • Guests

Darth Cheesecake wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.


There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault.  There could be millions of reapers for all we know.  I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way.  Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.


Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.

Only a Paragon deals in absoluets.


Image IPB

And icwutudidthar.

#88769
Flaargman117

Flaargman117
  • Members
  • 1 233 messages

Alphyn wrote...

Flaargman117 wrote...

This story is lookin' good Alphyn-my-boy, lookin' good.Image IPB

I didn't write it. :P

Yeah but I just wanted an excuse to quote that line. I really didn't expect that endng.Image IPB

#88770
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*

Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
  • Guests

DrathanGervaise wrote...

GeeMunkey wrote...

Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis  (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.

Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?


Patrick Stewart plays Saren's father.

He wouldn't be a villain though, because that's over the line.

...wait Patrick Stewart plays the Turian Admiral and before the battle he says both "engage" and "make it so" that would be more Epic than 20 Yodas with Puppies!

#88771
Phil725

Phil725
  • Members
  • 7 461 messages

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.


There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault.  There could be millions of reapers for all we know.  I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way.  Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.


Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.


I guess, still strikes me as metagaming a little.  I don't really see it being worth that kind of huge risk tiny reward scenario.  There are a lot of lives at stake.

#88772
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*

Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
  • Guests

DrathanGervaise wrote...

GeeMunkey wrote...

Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis  (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.

Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?


Patrick Stewart plays Saren's father.

He wouldn't be a villain though, because that's over the line.


Darth Cheesecake wrote...

Patrick Stewart..He'll play the real Reaper leader!


runescapeguy9 wrote...

Patrick Stewart...
[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/uncertain.png[/smilie]


We are such awesome people.

#88773
Grif101

Grif101
  • Members
  • 2 613 messages

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Grif101 wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Grif101 wrote...

Shazzammer2 wrote...

out of curiosity. How old are you folks?


Most here are I believe between 12 and 35 but I know a few are in their Grandpa stages........such as KFD for example:whistle:


Huh?! Whaaa'?! *wheezes* Now waaaiit just a minute! *cough cough* I'll have you know that when I was your age I walked 12 miles to school barefoot during winter. One way!...I don't even want to think about what we got to wear (or lack thereof) on the soles of our feet during the scorching hot summer months....Oh the inhumanity I tells ya!:D


Also I have to do that occasionely with 180 pound packs on my back smart*ss:ph34r:


Hey. Not my fault you didn't read the fine print of your contract before signing it. :D:P


Greatest job there is they said, good pay, camaderie and a chance to do your country proud they said.........now I go to work at 4:30 in the morning doing drill and calisthentics screaming "Infantry"!<_< :P:D

Now I understand why everyone musters out infantry the first chance they get<_<

On the other hand $60,000 a year is good money:D

#88774
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*

Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
  • Guests

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Darth Cheesecake wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Phil725 wrote...

I agree that it could use a different caption.  The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game.  I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it :?


In that context, maybe.

But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.


There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault.  There could be millions of reapers for all we know.  I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way.  Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.


Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.

Only a Paragon deals in absoluets.


Image IPB

And icwutudidthar.

Thanks!:ph34r:

#88775
sergio71785

sergio71785
  • Members
  • 12 202 messages
Shepard: This isn't about revenge. It's about the future of the galaxy!

Tali: Shepard blow up the damn ship!

Shepard: NO!! NOOOOOOO!!!

*Shepard smashes his gun against the ship models in his cabin*