
Fix'd.
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*

DrathanGervaise wrote...
Flaargman117 wrote...
It won't make the images go away, but... Apology accepted anyway. How can you turn down Garrus? Besides if I wanted to I could just get him killed on the suicide mission.
I kindly ask you to go f*ck yourself.
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
And Renegades won't let anything get in the way of the mission.DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
And Renegades won't let anything get in the way of the mission.DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
I didn't write it.Flaargman117 wrote...
This story is lookin' good Alphyn-my-boy, lookin' good.
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
Phil725 wrote...
DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault. There could be millions of reapers for all we know. I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way. Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.
Modifié par DrathanGervaise, 21 mars 2010 - 12:10 .
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
OMFG A PUPPY YAY! You made my day Drathan!DrathanGervaise wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
And Renegades won't let anything get in the way of the mission.DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
That's right!
Have a puppy!
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
Only a Paragon deals in absoluets.DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault. There could be millions of reapers for all we know. I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way. Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.
Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
GeeMunkey wrote...
Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.
Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?
GeeMunkey wrote...
Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.
Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?
I said if I wanted to...DrathanGervaise wrote...
Flaargman117 wrote...
It won't make the images go away, but... Apology accepted anyway. How can you turn down Garrus? Besides if I wanted to I could just get him killed on the suicide mission.
I kindly ask you to go f*ck yourself.
shnizzler93 wrote...
how is DA:O-Awakening?
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
Patrick Stewart..He'll play the real Reaper leader!GeeMunkey wrote...
Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.
Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?
Guest_runescapeguy9_*
Patrick Stewart...GeeMunkey wrote...
Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.
Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Only a Paragon deals in absoluets.DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault. There could be millions of reapers for all we know. I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way. Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.
Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.

Yeah but I just wanted an excuse to quote that line. I really didn't expect that endng.Alphyn wrote...
I didn't write it.Flaargman117 wrote...
This story is lookin' good Alphyn-my-boy, lookin' good.
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
...wait Patrick Stewart plays the Turian Admiral and before the battle he says both "engage" and "make it so" that would be more Epic than 20 Yodas with Puppies!DrathanGervaise wrote...
GeeMunkey wrote...
Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.
Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?
Patrick Stewart plays Saren's father.
He wouldn't be a villain though, because that's over the line.
DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault. There could be millions of reapers for all we know. I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way. Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.
Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.
Guest_DrathanGervaise_*
DrathanGervaise wrote...
GeeMunkey wrote...
Something just occured to me, In ME1 we had someone from Star Trek TNG, Marina Sirtis (Counselor Troi) play a villian, Matriarch Benezia.
Then in ME2, it was Michael Dorn (Worf) who played Gatatog Uvenk.
Who from Star Trek do you think will play a villian in ME3, and what race do you think they will be?
Patrick Stewart plays Saren's father.
He wouldn't be a villain though, because that's over the line.
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Patrick Stewart..He'll play the real Reaper leader!
runescapeguy9 wrote...
Patrick Stewart...
[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/uncertain.png[/smilie]
The_KFD_Case wrote...
Grif101 wrote...
The_KFD_Case wrote...
Grif101 wrote...
Shazzammer2 wrote...
out of curiosity. How old are you folks?
Most here are I believe between 12 and 35 but I know a few are in their Grandpa stages........such as KFD for example:whistle:
Huh?! Whaaa'?! *wheezes* Now waaaiit just a minute! *cough cough* I'll have you know that when I was your age I walked 12 miles to school barefoot during winter. One way!...I don't even want to think about what we got to wear (or lack thereof) on the soles of our feet during the scorching hot summer months....Oh the inhumanity I tells ya!
Also I have to do that occasionely with 180 pound packs on my back smart*ss:ph34r:
Hey. Not my fault you didn't read the fine print of your contract before signing it.:P
Guest_Darth Cheesecake_*
Thanks!DrathanGervaise wrote...
Darth Cheesecake wrote...
Only a Paragon deals in absoluets.DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
DrathanGervaise wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
I agree that it could use a different caption. The one used currently was one of the most questionable paragon decisions in the game. I get wanting to stick it to Cerberus/TIM, but endangering all galactic life is a pretty dumb way to do it
In that context, maybe.
But it still doesn't change the fact that a Paragon won't let fear or intimidation stand in the way of what he or she knows is right.
There's not letting fear change who you are, and there's being reckless to a fault. There could be millions of reapers for all we know. I don't see how forsaking any possible advantage against them is good in any way. Cerberus with advanced technology is a tiny percent as dangerous as the reapers.
Possibly, but I believe we stand for good or we don't stand at all.
And icwutudidthar.