137512 réponses à ce sujet

[The_KFD_Case]

Grif101 wrote...

Maybe we should all come down and drop the subject.........it's getting too tense:?

Meh. No worries. This little te-a-te is something I would quantify as "target practice". Nothing more.

[Xpardox91X]

Wally2905 wrote...

"You all know the mission, and what is at stake.
I have come to trust each of you with my life -- but I have also heard murmurs of discontent. I share your concerns.
Our love for Tali made them lock the first thread, but before that we held the line! Our love for Tali made them lock the second thread, but before that, we held the line!
Our influence will eventually make them lock this thread; in the battle today, we will hold the line!"

HELLZ YEAH! lol

[Admiral-165]

antilles333 wrote...

Triple post of doom.

yeah i went to press the caps button and i pressed something else and it posted three times...

one time i was posting something but the internet went down for a second and i pressed the post button a couple more times and i got a 6 times post or something

[sergio71785]

NuclearBuddha wrote...
Not really.  Bizarrely, the three types of class Phys/Tech/Biotic are best against their own kind!  Tech does more damage to shields and biotics does more damage to barriers.  Kinda weird, really.

Well, here's my reasoning. 

Engineers can mess with weapons and shields, which is what soldiers are all about.

Biotics are effectively immune to tech attacks; they rely on powers and use barriers instead of shields.

Soldiers carry a lot of firepower, and biotics can't stop bullets (and are generally lightly armored).

[Grif101]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Admiral-165 wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Admiral-165 wrote...

its not ignorant and false if i have proof to back it up...

It is however ignorant and bigoted to use one, or evan a handful of, case sample(s) to cast an entire population in a negative light. Food for thought young grashoppa.

 i never did that. i was talking about how Canada saved France in WWI and WWII then i was talking about how they're using the power of the minority to get special privilages that other Canadians don't have.

Don't even pretend you know what it's liek because you don't live here.

Oh 165, so eager to play grown-up at 15 years of age. Maturity will come in time - you needn't be so hellbent on trying to nail it down. Regardless, first of all you were commenting on the cowardice of French forces during WWI while under attack by chemical weapons. With drawing from such an attack in order to re-group and fight later seems strategically and tactically sound. That the Canadian forces held the line and didn't leave despite the chemical attack is admirable in a certain way though perhaps foolhardy. Besides, given the loss of literally millions upon millions of soldiers over several years it is not inconceivable that the French forces and its commanders at the time had more revelant combat experience dealing with those particular circumstances, and perhaps their willingness (and ability) to absorb the potential casualties was not as prevalent as previously. Again, food for thought.

As for WWII, well, the French defences were built up around a strategy meant to counter a WWI offensive that never came. Instead the German forces outmaneuvered the French Miginot Line by going through the Black Forest which was said to be impassable for a large military force. The Germans proved conventional wisdom at the time wrong - fair do to them. While it may seem like cowardice to you to surrender, perhaps you should try to consider what decision you might make in a similar situation and whether or not it might serve your country better in the long term as opposed to the short term. Withdrawing from one battle in order to continue to live and fight in an ongoing war is not necessarily cowardly (pending the specific circumstances) - it may actually be the sensible and strategically sound thing to do. Also, French forces fought very hard during WWII and liberated much of the southern French coast line in a matter of weeks. Very impressive. However, if you are so eager to scream and clamor for the so-called "glory" of the battlefield then why not enlist once you are old enough and actually learn for yourself some of the realities of military life?

Finally, while it does improve one's chances of familiarizing oneself with a given country and culture by living in it, it is by no means a guarantee that one will acquire a great understanding of the place that is relevant to whichever topic is being discussed in detail. Conversely, one can do much to study the history of any given culture/nation and thus gain some sense of what that culture may be like and one is certainly able to come to learn about the relevant history. This reality may not be convenient for you in your attempt to shut me out of the debate yet I can assure you that you will have to do much, much better than that.

I find myself as alway's these day's agreeing with my esteemed colleague here..............if you really want to argue with us then I suggest you enlist, get some real insight into the inner working's of the military and perhaps do some more research (NOT Wikipedia) into the subject of culture and geopolitics........

[GeeMunkey]

NuclearBuddha wrote...

sergio71785 wrote...

Darth Cheesecake wrote...
ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
discuss this:
Tali vrs. the ME1 LI
Talk about the epicness!

I believe there's a slight rock, papers, scissors effect between the different classes. Soldiers > Biotics > Engineers > Soldiers 

But that doesn't matter, as I'll make sure Tali wins against anyone. <3

Not really.  Bizarrely, the three types of class Phys/Tech/Biotic are best against their own kind!  Tech does more damage to shields and biotics does more damage to barriers.  Kinda weird, really.

I have incindiary ammo, your argument is invalid.

[The_KFD_Case]

Admiral-165 wrote...

ok that's it i;m gonna type in caps

GET BACK ON TOPI EVERYONE! I DONT WANNA ARGUE ANYMORE! KFD STOPPING QUOTING THE BIBLE AND BRINGING UP DEAD ARGUMENTS!

1) You don't get to tell me what to do.

2) All caps do not automatically equate with your message being any more palatable.

3) I don't do the Bible. If you want to be a holy-roller feel free to do so on your own time.

[RevanKun123]

Somebody1003 wrote...

RevanKun123 wrote...

Somebody1003 wrote...

RevanKun123 wrote...

Don't give me qualities that I don't have.

Why lie Revan?  Your always nice.

I don't lie. 
It's reality.
That all.

Your nice come on Revan admit it.

If you werent nice you would have told me to f**k off by now.

That is because I am too polite for it.

[Driving Ghost]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Admiral-165 wrote...

ok that's it i;m gonna type in caps

GET BACK ON TOPI EVERYONE! I DONT WANNA ARGUE ANYMORE! KFD STOPPING QUOTING THE BIBLE AND BRINGING UP DEAD ARGUMENTS!

1) You don't get to tell me what to do.

2) All caps do not automatically equate with your message being any more palatable.

3) I don't do the Bible. If you want to be a holy-roller feel free to do so on your own time.

Owhgawd, you 2 are fighting over the internet.

Mature much.

[NuclearBuddha]

GeeMunkey wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...

sergio71785 wrote...

Darth Cheesecake wrote...
ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
discuss this:
Tali vrs. the ME1 LI
Talk about the epicness!

I believe there's a slight rock, papers, scissors effect between the different classes. Soldiers > Biotics > Engineers > Soldiers 

But that doesn't matter, as I'll make sure Tali wins against anyone. <3

Not really.  Bizarrely, the three types of class Phys/Tech/Biotic are best against their own kind!  Tech does more damage to shields and biotics does more damage to barriers.  Kinda weird, really.

I have incindiary ammo, your argument is invalid.

Just pointing out the differing effectiveness of the direct-damage powers.

Edit:  Rockin' pic, though.

Modifié par NuclearBuddha, 21 mars 2010 - 08:33 .

[RevanKun123]

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Admiral-165 wrote...

ok that's it i;m gonna type in caps

GET BACK ON TOPI EVERYONE! I DONT WANNA ARGUE ANYMORE! KFD STOPPING QUOTING THE BIBLE AND BRINGING UP DEAD ARGUMENTS!

1) You don't get to tell me what to do.

2) All caps do not automatically equate with your message being any more palatable.

3) I don't do the Bible. If you want to be a holy-roller feel free to do so on your own time.

Is it me or nobody like your arguments?
Beside the normal people I mean.

[chool77]

who would have thought a quarian pounce could not get up back on topic...



i have fail .*sad face*

[Felipe 058]

KFD is right, everyone else is wrong (most of the time). Now stfu or gtfo.

[BTG_01]

[NuclearBuddha]

sergio71785 wrote...

NuclearBuddha wrote...
Not really.  Bizarrely, the three types of class Phys/Tech/Biotic are best against their own kind!  Tech does more damage to shields and biotics does more damage to barriers.  Kinda weird, really.

Well, here's my reasoning. 

Engineers can mess with weapons and shields, which is what soldiers are all about.

Biotics are effectively immune to tech attacks; they rely on powers and use barriers instead of shields.

Soldiers carry a lot of firepower, and biotics can't stop bullets (and are generally lightly armored).

I consider the Infiltrator to be kind of phys/tech hybrid, and it's what I'm most familiar with.  Armor doesn't bother me, and Shields are joke.  But I have the devil's own time with Barriers until I can get Warp Ammo.

[Admiral-165]

Darth Cheesecake wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Admiral-165 wrote...

ok that's it i;m gonna type in caps

GET BACK ON TOPI EVERYONE! I DONT WANNA ARGUE ANYMORE! KFD STOPPING QUOTING THE BIBLE AND BRINGING UP DEAD ARGUMENTS!

1) You don't get to tell me what to do.

2) All caps do not automatically equate with your message being any more palatable.

3) I don't do the Bible. If you want to be a holy-roller feel free to do so on your own time.

Damn it KFD your not helping!

exactlky KFD you're just proving my point. bringing up dead topics from a couple pages ago... we've already settled this and yet you still feel the need to bring it up again? and insult me too? that's pretty low.