137512 réponses à ce sujet

[SgTKilmor]

antilles333 wrote...

I'm becoming more and more turned off to this thread. Needless to say when I start 4.0, if we're even allowed to after the bullcrap jake has posted, I will state specific rules.

Because the mods read every page of the thread, I can tell you, that causing attention to that sort of subject, would result in an unfriendly lock. Secondly, that picture posted above is not pornography, not against the rules.

[Jake71887]

DrathanGervaise wrote...
It's like a 50 car pile up...
Jake, I need you to post TIM Fail motivational poster to fully rationalize my fail.

I can't, posted 3 times today already, it's my daily max for reusing pictures!! 

[vykvyper1]

here's the whole comic minus the last frame. The author has rachni come and carry her off in the last frame:blink:... that's not what this thread is about.

anyway:

[The_KFD_Case]

Gerudan wrote...

The_KFD_Case wrote...

Ah hah! But I do accept that and by the very use of the words "conscious decision" it becomes our own act and thus we bear responsibility for it. 

No, because we only think it is a conscious decision´, but it is not. 

I find this a really interesting thing, because it means that everything we think we know about us, is wrong. It undermines the very foundation of the understanding of ourselfs and our society. 

And there are very few, who are able to accept that. 

It also doesn't mean, I don't feel responsible for the things I do, but I still think it is very interesting. 

How can we know that when our mind makes the final conscious decision that it is in fact not genuinely conscious when we can't even fully account for what being conscious is?

I stand by what I said previously; barring proven legal insanity (to the best of our knowledge and efforts), a person is responsible for their actions. Other people may be punished for aiding and abetting in bringing on such action and thus bear a responsibility of their own. This may, or may not, create mitigating circumstances for the central party in question yet regardless that person bears responsibility of his/her/its own actions barring temporary (or permanent) insanity in which case they are to be secured under the care of the state.

This argument is reminiscent of the debate as to what is real and whether we can ever truly know what is real. I subscribe to this school of thought: What we do and perceive may be real or it may not be. This could all be a dream of some unknown cosmic being in which case once it wakes up all of this *gestures around* may disappear in a flash. It may also be the case that all of this is not a dream. Essentially what it boils down to is this: Each individual will have to decide for him or herself whether they are going to simply sit and do nothing, or not take responsibility for anything they do because "it may not be real" and if they are right , no problem. Yet if they are wrong they may die from starvation due to sitting around and doing nothing, or be incarcerated and/or killed by other people whose lives have been impacted by their nihilistic ways. Alternatively you can decide that whether this is real or not, it appears to be real and as long as it keeps appearing that way one might as well go with it and make the most of it. If it isn't real you haven't lost anything and if it is real then you've successfully lived your life. It's similar to the argument Descartes made in regards to whether one should believe in God or not.

If you don't care for that approach then here's another one: Since we can't know any of this for sure even according to neurologists apparently, then I reject your reality and replace it with my own. 

Modifié par The_KFD_Case, 26 février 2010 - 09:41 .

[Terrorfex]

antilles333 wrote...

I'm becoming more and more turned off to this thread. Needless to say when I start 4.0, if we're even allowed to after the bullcrap jake has posted, I will state specific rules.

Careful now. Nobody put you in charge of Taliwub - alienate too many people and we might all march under someone else's flag.

*drops pants*. We just need the flag ...

[Jake71887]

SgTKilmor wrote...

antilles333 wrote...

I'm becoming more and more turned off to this thread. Needless to say when I start 4.0, if we're even allowed to after the bullcrap jake has posted, I will state specific rules.

Because the mods read every page of the thread, I can tell you, that causing attention to that sort of subject, would result in an unfriendly lock. Secondly, that picture posted above is not pornography, not against the rules.

I'm honestly not sure why people even find that pic offensive... 

[HK01]

antilles333 wrote...

I'm becoming more and more turned off to this thread. Needless to say when I start 4.0, if we're even allowed to after the bullcrap jake has posted, I will state specific rules.

I still didn't see anything terrible happen in this thread. All this "bullcrap" you're talking about must be posted when I'm not looking and in the pages I miss while sleeping...

All I'm seeing is people having harmless fun.

[Jake71887]

vykvyper1 wrote...

here's the whole comic minus the last frame. The author has rachni come and carry her off in the last frame:blink:... that's not what this thread is about.

anyway:

That.... is.... ADORABLE!!!!

I mean...







Bewbs 

[Fizwold]

Random Image time , please ignore the SR1 , i forgot i parked it there. (image the work of both Focant and I)

[SgTKilmor]

Jake71887 wrote...
I'm honestly not sure why people even find that pic offensive... 

Yeah, I don't know either. It's pretty easy to ignore it if you don't like it. Making a fuss just makes it worse.

[Lone_Wolf0]

Jake71887 wrote...

SgTKilmor wrote...

antilles333 wrote...

I'm becoming more and more turned off to this thread. Needless to say when I start 4.0, if we're even allowed to after the bullcrap jake has posted, I will state specific rules.

Because the mods read every page of the thread, I can tell you, that causing attention to that sort of subject, would result in an unfriendly lock. Secondly, that picture posted above is not pornography, not against the rules.

I'm honestly not sure why people even find that pic offensive... 

I'd just like to throw in that if your boss or teacher happened to walk by while that picture was on the screen, it wouldn't end too well. THAT's the reason we don't want pics like that on here. Keep it safe for those of us who want to keep chatting with you guys while in public places.

[The_KFD_Case]

HK01 wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Commandr Bond wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Just remember, once Obama is done screwing US over, he's coming for the rest of you.

But they all have universal health care already...

Fair enough. We'll just have to see what happens.

We've had it for a while, it works just fine. Don't know why there's such a fuss about it over in the States.

But we don't want to talk about politics. Always leads to flame wars.

I want a Rachni Brood Warrior on my squad for ME3!!!

The fact that there are 36+ million US citizens without adequate healthcare flies in the face of that statement. Also, many public hospitals' emergency units are flooded with victims that don't actually qualify for emergency care but because that's the one area where everyone has to be accepted they are funneled there. It's not efficient and puts a huge strain on those departments of the public health system. Frankly it's disgraceful that it's taken this long for a world leading country like the US to even begin to seriously try to catch up. 

[NuclearBuddha]

antilles333 wrote...

I'm becoming more and more turned off to this thread. Needless to say when I start 4.0, if we're even allowed to after the bullcrap jake has posted, I will state specific rules.

Ah yes, "rules" as if any enforcement by individual forum users were possible.  We have dismissed these claims.

C'mon, why you gotta be so confrontational?

[Yionel]

vykvyper1 wrote...

here's the whole comic minus the last frame. The author has rachni come and carry her off in the last frame:blink:... that's not what this thread is about.

anyway:

That thing made me lol

[Jake71887]

SgTKilmor wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...
I'm honestly not sure why people even find that pic offensive... 

Yeah, I don't know either. It's pretty easy to ignore it if you don't like it. Making a fuss just makes it worse.

No, I mean, what's offensive about it? I've heard some people claim it'sa  ****** pic, but that looks more like the seam of her suit(Look at the stomach), and if it was ****** it'd mean she had a big... well you get it. 

That being said, the only other thing to possibly be offended by is her pose, and since when is a seductive pose NSFW or even wrong?

I'm going insane!!! 

[turelhimvampire]

Objects in Space part 14 is now up on my blog - link in my sig!

[Jake71887]

Lone_Wolf0 wrote...

I'd just like to throw in that if your boss or teacher happened to walk by while that picture was on the screen, it wouldn't end too well. THAT's the reason we don't want pics like that on here. Keep it safe for those of us who want to keep chatting with you guys while in public places.

Didn't stop me from watching Porn in school during computer class... And certainly didn't stop some of my teachers either 

[The_KFD_Case]

antilles333 wrote...

I'm becoming more and more turned off to this thread. Needless to say when I start 4.0, if we're even allowed to after the bullcrap jake has posted, I will state specific rules.

Then I think you can expect to see an open split in the Talimancer camp. I for one will not be bound by rules set down by people whom have no legitimate authority in BioWare's forum.

[Yionel]

Jake71887 wrote...

Lone_Wolf0 wrote...

I'd just like to throw in that if your boss or teacher happened to walk by while that picture was on the screen, it wouldn't end too well. THAT's the reason we don't want pics like that on here. Keep it safe for those of us who want to keep chatting with you guys while in public places.

Didn't stop me from watching Porn in school during computer class... And certainly didn't stop some of my teachers either 

 We dont all go to US schools

[Lone_Wolf0]

Jake71887 wrote...

SgTKilmor wrote...

Jake71887 wrote...
I'm honestly not sure why people even find that pic offensive... 

Yeah, I don't know either. It's pretty easy to ignore it if you don't like it. Making a fuss just makes it worse.

No, I mean, what's offensive about it? I've heard some people claim it'sa  ****** pic, but that looks more like the seam of her suit(Look at the stomach), and if it was ****** it'd mean she had a big... well you get it. 

That being said, the only other thing to possibly be offended by is her pose, and since when is a seductive pose NSFW or even wrong?

I'm going insane!!! 

I'm not saying it's offensive for most of us on here, and I'm not a prude, so I don't get all self-righteous over a pic which has NO nudity at all in it. The only issue is with other people seeing the somewhat highlighted body parts which they might not necessarily approve of, unlike us.
EDIT: Also, I doubt the Mods would shut down the thread for pictures like that, since they have no nudity in them...

Modifié par Lone_Wolf0, 26 février 2010 - 09:41 .