i like tht its funneh the way shep smiles lolNuclearBuddha wrote...
Earlier someone had said they really liked what people are calling the "starcraft tali." If whoever that was is still around, this is for them.
All Tali fans, read this! IT'S UP TO US TO KEEP TALI ALIVE! 3.0!!
#20076
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:04
#20077
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:04
Not to the innocents he killed.Somebody1003 wrote...
Saren got the job done, isnt that what really matters?camoboy_19 wrote...
I can see what you are trying to say but the evil of his actions, and his intentions, can never be justified. He ressurected Shepard because he wanted to use Shepard for humanity's, and more so his, advance. If you learned of how Anderson got kicked out of Spectres (Sarren killed 500 innocents with pollution just to get one guy wanted by the Council) You can see where the ideology of my statement comes from. Theres a time to be harsh, even a renegade, but people like TIM and Sarren don't realize that should be the last resort
#20078
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:04
Guest_Somebody1003_*
You wouldnt kill a few to save many?alickar wrote...
even if they were innocents and they did nothing to u and no one else u r sickPhil725 wrote...
alickar wrote...
like i said if he revived and he told u to kill 1 million people would uPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
Of course not, but that's irrelevant to my whole point. TIM wouldn't ask you. He isn't a terrorist. Everything he does has a bigger goal behind it.
If TIM revived me and told me to kill a million people to save a billion? I'd like to think I'd be able to do it.
Modifié par Somebody1003, 27 février 2010 - 04:04 .
#20079
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:05
dude i wud not kill them unless they did something wrong i wouldent just shoot them for no reasonSomebody1003 wrote...
You wouldnt kill a few to save many?alickar wrote...
even if they were innocents and they did nothing to u and no one else u r sickPhil725 wrote...
alickar wrote...
like i said if he revived and he told u to kill 1 million people would uPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
Of course not, but that's irrelevant to my whole point. TIM wouldn't ask you. He isn't a terrorist. Everything he does has a bigger goal behind it.
If TIM revived me and told me to kill a million people to save a billion? I'd like to think I'd be able to do it.
#20080
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:05
Guest_Somebody1003_*
That isnt any of his concern though, he did what he had to do.NuclearBuddha wrote...
Not to the innocents he killed.Somebody1003 wrote...
Saren got the job done, isnt that what really matters?camoboy_19 wrote...
I can see what you are trying to say but the evil of his actions, and his intentions, can never be justified. He ressurected Shepard because he wanted to use Shepard for humanity's, and more so his, advance. If you learned of how Anderson got kicked out of Spectres (Sarren killed 500 innocents with pollution just to get one guy wanted by the Council) You can see where the ideology of my statement comes from. Theres a time to be harsh, even a renegade, but people like TIM and Sarren don't realize that should be the last resort
Modifié par Somebody1003, 27 février 2010 - 04:05 .
#20081
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:05
alickar wrote...
like i said if he revived and he told u to kill 1 million people would u
If it saved millions, or billions, or even trillions of more lives, how could you not? Problem is the future is unknown to a large extent and thus there is no guarantee that anything you do will turn out precisely as expected. That said, there can be compelling evidence that can be very accurate in predicting what a likely future outcome would be. If the stakes are perceived to be high enough, such as the destruction of trillions of sapient beings, then yes I would logically agree that sacrificing a million lives is worth it. Then you have to determine who dies. I can imagine feeling sick to my stomach and possibly not wanting to live after making such a decision. The mantle of power and leadership can be a heavy burden.
Modifié par The_KFD_Case, 27 février 2010 - 04:11 .
#20082
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:06
The end isn't enough to justify the means. If the factory had to be destroyed, then the workers and other populace could have been saved. Catching one man doesn't justify the death of 500 innocents. Cerberus is the same. The terrorism they use to do what they think is right is wrong in every sense of the wordSomebody1003 wrote...
Saren got the job done, isnt that what really matters?camoboy_19 wrote...
I can see what you are trying to say but the evil of his actions, and his intentions, can never be justified. He ressurected Shepard because he wanted to use Shepard for humanity's, and more so his, advance. If you learned of how Anderson got kicked out of Spectres (Sarren killed 500 innocents with pollution just to get one guy wanted by the Council) You can see where the ideology of my statement comes from. Theres a time to be harsh, even a renegade, but people like TIM and Sarren don't realize that should be the last resortPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
#20083
Guest_MarineBorn_*
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:06
Guest_MarineBorn_*
TIM tried to kill hundreds of innocent Quarians during peacetime, witout informing them that they were harboring a cerberus biotic experment (poor girl) and for no other reason then he wanted his little weapon back becuase he thought 'HE' would gain from it.
look at the bomb dropped on Hiroshema in WW2 America dropped that becuase a ground campaign would have cost more lives then dropping the bomb would have, this is a example of giving something to gain something. TIM however was willing to throw away the lives of innocent people for somthing he thougth 'MIGHT' have worked, he had no real way to tell if the girl would have been a productive weapon.
#20084
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:06
#20085
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:06
He didn't have to. Those people didn't have to die. That man would have been captured all the sameSomebody1003 wrote...
That isnt any of his concern though, he did what he had to do.NuclearBuddha wrote...
Not to the innocents he killed.Somebody1003 wrote...
Saren got the job done, isnt that what really matters?camoboy_19 wrote...
I can see what you are trying to say but the evil of his actions, and his intentions, can never be justified. He ressurected Shepard because he wanted to use Shepard for humanity's, and more so his, advance. If you learned of how Anderson got kicked out of Spectres (Sarren killed 500 innocents with pollution just to get one guy wanted by the Council) You can see where the ideology of my statement comes from. Theres a time to be harsh, even a renegade, but people like TIM and Sarren don't realize that should be the last resort
#20086
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:06
NuclearBuddha wrote...
The council is nothing if not short-sighted. What they did to the quarians makes perfect sense if you're just thinking about the present time. Someone gets punished for unleashing an AI race, and then the issue is settled. They get to congratulate themselves for upholding the laws without actually doing anything. See how convenient that is?
If they gave two craps about the future, they would've done something about the geth right then. But they didn't. They swept the quarians under the rug and, stuck their fingers in their ear-analogues, and went, "lalalala, everythings fixed!"
The problem with that though is that they closed off all communication with the Quarian people by evicting their embassy. No embassy no representation, no way to to be a part of the community. No control over their lives.
The Quarians just about settled a world but had the mind to go to the council and say they were going to.
The council then backtracked and said they were awarding rights to the Elcor a month after the Quarians made planetfall. They took all the effort the Quarians did in finding, charting and settling the planet and smiled saying GTFO or we'll turn your people to glass with an orbital bombardment.
The council is specifically gearing for the downfall of the Quarians. They refuse to talk to them and all efforts by the Quarians to play by the rules just gets a swift boot to the quad.
To be a Quarian is to be the laughing stock of the galactic stage. Their only 2 options are to either retake their home from a genocidal machine race or to go well beyond known council space to settle on uncharted worlds beyond council influence and aid.
There's no happy ending for these people without intervention.
#20087
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:06
Guest_Somebody1003_*
The mission always comes first. Thats why Saren was such a good Specter.camoboy_19 wrote...
The end isn't enough to justify the means. If the factory had to be destroyed, then the workers and other populace could have been saved. Catching one man doesn't justify the death of 500 innocents. Cerberus is the same. The terrorism they use to do what they think is right is wrong in every sense of the wordSomebody1003 wrote...
Saren got the job done, isnt that what really matters?camoboy_19 wrote...
I can see what you are trying to say but the evil of his actions, and his intentions, can never be justified. He ressurected Shepard because he wanted to use Shepard for humanity's, and more so his, advance. If you learned of how Anderson got kicked out of Spectres (Sarren killed 500 innocents with pollution just to get one guy wanted by the Council) You can see where the ideology of my statement comes from. Theres a time to be harsh, even a renegade, but people like TIM and Sarren don't realize that should be the last resortPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
#20088
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:06
well if he told u to kill ur own teammates wud u if u wud u r very sickThe_KFD_Case wrote...
alickar wrote...
like i said if he revived and he told u to kill 1 million people would u
If it saved millions, or billions, or even trillions of more lives, how could you not? Problem is the future unknown to a large extent and thus there is no guarantee that anything you do will turn out precisely as expected. That said, there can be compelling evidence that can be very accurate in predicting what a likely future outcome would be. If the stakes are perceived to be high enough, such as the destruction of trillions of sapient beings, then yes I would logically agree that sacrificing a million lives is worth it. Then you have to determine who dies. I can imagine feeling sick to my stomach and possibly not wanting to live after making such a decision. The mantle of power and leadership can be a heavy burden.
#20089
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:07
#20090
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:07
Guest_Somebody1003_*
So you'd let the billions die just so you can feel good about yourself?alickar wrote...
dude i wud not kill them unless they did something wrong i wouldent just shoot them for no reasonSomebody1003 wrote...
You wouldnt kill a few to save many?alickar wrote...
even if they were innocents and they did nothing to u and no one else u r sickPhil725 wrote...
alickar wrote...
like i said if he revived and he told u to kill 1 million people would uPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
Of course not, but that's irrelevant to my whole point. TIM wouldn't ask you. He isn't a terrorist. Everything he does has a bigger goal behind it.
If TIM revived me and told me to kill a million people to save a billion? I'd like to think I'd be able to do it.
#20091
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:07
#20092
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:09
no i means he wanted u to kill 1 million innocents just for his amusment wud uSomebody1003 wrote...
So you'd let the billions die just so you can feel good about yourself?alickar wrote...
dude i wud not kill them unless they did something wrong i wouldent just shoot them for no reasonSomebody1003 wrote...
You wouldnt kill a few to save many?alickar wrote...
even if they were innocents and they did nothing to u and no one else u r sickPhil725 wrote...
alickar wrote...
like i said if he revived and he told u to kill 1 million people would uPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
Of course not, but that's irrelevant to my whole point. TIM wouldn't ask you. He isn't a terrorist. Everything he does has a bigger goal behind it.
If TIM revived me and told me to kill a million people to save a billion? I'd like to think I'd be able to do it.
#20093
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:09
True, but that would make him a monster. It's not as if he was saving the galaxy by killing innocents, he was disrupting a weapons smuggling ring or something.Somebody1003 wrote...
That isnt any of his concern though, he did what he had to do.NuclearBuddha wrote...
Not to the innocents he killed.Somebody1003 wrote...
Saren got the job done, isnt that what really matters?camoboy_19 wrote...
I can see what you are trying to say but the evil of his actions, and his intentions, can never be justified. He ressurected Shepard because he wanted to use Shepard for humanity's, and more so his, advance. If you learned of how Anderson got kicked out of Spectres (Sarren killed 500 innocents with pollution just to get one guy wanted by the Council) You can see where the ideology of my statement comes from. Theres a time to be harsh, even a renegade, but people like TIM and Sarren don't realize that should be the last resort
#20094
Guest_Somebody1003_*
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:09
Guest_Somebody1003_*
well thats a different story.alickar wrote...
no i means he wanted u to kill 1 million innocents just for his amusment wud uSomebody1003 wrote...
So you'd let the billions die just so you can feel good about yourself?alickar wrote...
dude i wud not kill them unless they did something wrong i wouldent just shoot them for no reasonSomebody1003 wrote...
You wouldnt kill a few to save many?alickar wrote...
even if they were innocents and they did nothing to u and no one else u r sickPhil725 wrote...
alickar wrote...
like i said if he revived and he told u to kill 1 million people would uPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
Of course not, but that's irrelevant to my whole point. TIM wouldn't ask you. He isn't a terrorist. Everything he does has a bigger goal behind it.
If TIM revived me and told me to kill a million people to save a billion? I'd like to think I'd be able to do it.
#20095
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:09
Jake71887 wrote...
Guys.... GUYS... these conversations are really boring.. needs more Tali
i agree to the full extent of this pic:D
#20096
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:09
The mission doesn't come first in the sense of right. In the sense of neutrality maybe so, but life comes first. If you must let one wanted man get away to keep yourself from killing 100 innocent people, isn't that better than murdering defenseless people?Somebody1003 wrote...
The mission always comes first. Thats why Saren was such a good Specter.camoboy_19 wrote...
The end isn't enough to justify the means. If the factory had to be destroyed, then the workers and other populace could have been saved. Catching one man doesn't justify the death of 500 innocents. Cerberus is the same. The terrorism they use to do what they think is right is wrong in every sense of the wordSomebody1003 wrote...
Saren got the job done, isnt that what really matters?camoboy_19 wrote...
I can see what you are trying to say but the evil of his actions, and his intentions, can never be justified. He ressurected Shepard because he wanted to use Shepard for humanity's, and more so his, advance. If you learned of how Anderson got kicked out of Spectres (Sarren killed 500 innocents with pollution just to get one guy wanted by the Council) You can see where the ideology of my statement comes from. Theres a time to be harsh, even a renegade, but people like TIM and Sarren don't realize that should be the last resortPhil725 wrote...
Geth Hunter Alpha wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
Snip*
We have differing opinions on that then. First of all, the game makes it pretty clear that there is no evidence linking TIM personally to any of those things, the Teltin facility specifically even has its members say they went rogue.
And even if he was responsible? He has still saved many more lives than he has ended by reviving Shepard. People look at the 5 marines killed by Thresher Maws in ME1, and that has a more profound effect on people than the hundreds of thousands of colonists who would be collector meat without him. The reason is that the former is a more personal loss. You see the wasted lives. I'm not defending Cerberus' actions, but they have done way more good than people give them credit for.
As far as TIM, he doesn't hide what he wants. He wants humanity to be the superior race in the galaxy. He also knows that the reapers must be stopped for that to happen (he's also the only person with power in the game to acknowledge them,) until the reapers are defeated, you share a common goal, and TIM will be a better ally than anyone else. Once the reapers are gone, and he has no use for you, then he becomes a problem.
They went rogue true (or at least thats how it looks), but if you ask Miranda about it she says that TIM ordered the facility shut down before Jack escaped. Which is a funny way of putting it cuase it makes him look innocent if you dont look at it closely. Miranda kinda sidesteps the question, Cuase whats not said is if he supported its conception initially. And considering that miranda hides it, I'd say that he did.
Secondly TIM does not get credit for the actions of sheppard. he gets credit for saving sheppard but not for what sheppard does afterward.
Also it wasnt just 5 marines on akuze. it was an entire colony that cerberus loosed the thresher maws on. And even if it was to save other colonies there are better ways to go about it.
And finally if you save the collector ship he all but states that he wants humans to dominate the galaxy not just to keep humanity safe.
How does TIM not get credit for saving the colonists in the Terminus systems? He saw a problem, and stopped it the only way he could, by using an insane amount of resources to bring back the one guy who could. Just because there's a period in the middle where TIM isn't directly involved, doesn't mean he wasn't responsible. Without him, every one of those colonists is dead. I don't see any way around that statement, which means he gets credit.
Are there better ways of accomplishing what TIM wants than turning colonies into husks? Yeah, but it may take them 10 years to learn what a week could tell them. TIM is just the ultimate renegade in that respect. He will do whatever it takes. Does this make him a bad person? Maybe, but the whole "ends justifies the means" thing has to hold some water.
And as far as using the collector base to make humans dominate the galaxy, that's irrelevant to Shepard's concerns for ME3. TIM knows about the reaper's threat. He will use the collector base to help defeat them first, and Shepard knows that. If we have to deal with TIM and his collector base after the reapers? I'm not too concerned.
#20097
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:10
#20098
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:10
alickar wrote...
need a tali pic please to stop this nonsense
IDK...some people get immune to something if exposed for too long. In this case it is a horible, horible
thought, but just in case. So one should be immune to Tali, no one.
#20099
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:10
alickar wrote...
need a tali pic please to stop this nonsense
Modifié par Jake71887, 27 février 2010 - 04:11 .
#20100
Guest_MarineBorn_*
Posté 27 février 2010 - 04:10
Guest_MarineBorn_*




Ce sujet est fermé

Retour en haut




