Garrus Love and Adoration v.2
#25351
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 04:47
#25352
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 04:50
battlechantress wrote...
Because I have my suspicions that it will play more like freakin' "Transformers" than something more original that has a bit more plot and fewer explosions. (Don't get me wrong, I like explosions. I love fire too. It just tends to get overdone these days.)
Now, I DID hate "Transformers 2". What a piece of !@#$%^. If anyone had told me I'd see a movie that had "too many explosions", I'd have laughed in their faces...but, there it was. It was too big, too loud, and MUCH too long.
Plus,Garrus wasn't even in it. Now how could it be any good considering that??
Oh, no. Now he's bitter.
#25353
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 04:53
--
Although I may take a look at the movie - not necessarily grabbing a seat at a theatre - to see what Turians would look like.
#25354
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 04:54
As some one who doesn't remember enough of the Transformers cartoon, I actually liked the movies. Though... there's a lot I could have done without, they were eye candy. Plus it was easier to follow the action in 2 than it was in 1. I felt like 1 was full of beeboppin' robots... was... awkward.
I'm all for original plots for sci-fi movies (always a good thing, really) but I know the biggest beef I had with D9 was it's format: the "let's make it like it's a documentary" garbage made it practically impossible to follow. I really didn't like it. It probably has a great premise and all, but again... it's delivery was poor.
Hopefully, ME's movie won't be the same. If Hollywood does it's usual "we need to grab as many people as we can" BS... then well, we're boned. But that's the nature of Hollywood: to make as much money off us poor suckers as plausible.
#25355
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 05:01
Although I will truthfully say that the chance to see awesomely-rendered turians of any sort would be worth virtually any kind of torture for me.
(And I loved "Transformers I". I just thought 2 sucked major ass.
#25356
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 05:42
#25357
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 05:52
DO NOT WANT x 1 googol.
#25358
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 05:57
That was what was so refreshing about it in the first place, it showed first contact with extraterrestrial life having difficulties that were not "BLOW EACH OTHER UP WITH LOTS OF SPECIAL EFFECTS", had a completely new take on the genre....then they decided to blow each other up with lots of special effects anyway.
It pissed me off immensely.
#25359
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:10
#25360
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:14
#25361
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:21
Am I the only person who thinks that turians will lean more towards animatronics than CGI? I think it would look even more cool if they could do that and pull it off.
#25362
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:25
Something like this could be done for things like eyes, with a bit more extensive computer work for things like the mandibles, etc. Then standard motion capture for the rest of the body movements.
Of course, I doubt an ME movie could get a budget that big.
#25363
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:33
If they ever plan to make the movie video game-like (which I have a gut feeling it will), I'm going to be very disappointed. And if they ruin turians for me...
#25364
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:37
#25365
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:42
As for Transformers - biggest snorefest ever -IMHO - the sequel which I was unduly forced to go along and see, even worse.
Considering they have announced an ME movie - I'd like to lay money down on odds they'll definitely *&^ it up Collider.
#25366
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 06:50
Lemonwizard wrote...
Well, to be fair, given most of the examples....the stigma is well deserved.
I think it has, but I blame the crew and producers who had started this stigma. When they think of video games, they think "guns/swords, explosion and lots of action", therefore thinking they need to make the film suit its genre. However, they instead made it rather cliche. I think movie producers need to stop thinking these titles to just be 'video games' but as stories needed to be told in motion picture.
I'm having low expectations of this ME film (if it's ever made). I've given up on Hollywood since they decided in the last few months announcing adaptations (Kane & Lynch film and particularly a Bleach manga live action adaptation motion picture
Modifié par Alexine, 09 juin 2010 - 06:51 .
#25367
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 07:03
#25368
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 07:10
#25369
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 07:11
Kim Shepard wrote...
Am I the only one who doesn't mind the idea of a Mass Effect movie? xD I've seen enough book/movie adaptations that changed so much from the original, it wouldn't really bother me if the ME movie was the same way. I almost expect it. It's a little annoying when people are acting out-of-character though.
I don't mind the idea - I'm just worried they'll mess it up completely
#25370
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 07:16
But anyway, back onto Garrus. If there was a ME movie, who should play Garrus? I think Brandon Keener is talented enough to do it, but I have a gut feeling they'll cast some A-list actor just to make a few extra million.
#25371
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 07:31
#25372
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 07:36
I will now pitch a small tent in this thread and live here happily ever after.
#25373
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 08:42
kglaser wrote...
Srsly. A Mass Effect movie would be like a train wreck running into a nuclear bomb detonation inside an active volcano.
Now for some catching up:
I propose a name for us Garrus fans: how about Garrusians? It's got the same "ian" ending as "Vakarian"~
@ Xsause: You deliver once again. Those "FemShep is a sex goddess" pics are genius
About sexy voices: Thane just doesn't do it for me. It's strange, because he should; he's got the same kind of velvety voice with a touch of raucousness as Garrus...but he just ends up sounding like he gargles cement every morning, to me. I second Liam Neeson's voice though. I'll also throw in a word for Alan Rickman. His voice has a rather strange guttural effect to it, but it actually works (plus he was DAMN sexy as Snape...he's the only reason I ever watched a Harry Potter film...well, him and Gary Oldman as Sirius Black). Another sexy voice, but not an actor this time: Kelly Jones, the singer for Stereophonics. Hotdangit.
As for bad VA, I have one word: Grandia. Terrible game, but the VA just took the cake, ran away with it and punted it over the nearest fence...and off a cliff. Into a pack of angry sharks. There's also Valkyrie Profile...great game...atrocious VA ("BICYCLE DISASTERRRRR!"). It's a testament to how good the rest of it is that I'm still able to play it.
#25374
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 09:00
Nilfalasiel wrote...
Now for some catching up:
I propose a name for us Garrus fans: how about Garrusians? It's got the same "ian" ending as "Vakarian"~
That name reminds me of Gerousia, the old men who served as advisors for the Spartian society. And it sounds the same when pronounced
Nilfalasiel wrote...
...but he just ends up sounding like he gargles cement every morning, to me.
HAHA, when I read I was laughing my lungs out. Never thought of Thane's voice like that. Now I'm going to laugh at Thane whenever he talks now.
And welcome, Filby08! Hope you enjoy your stay here at this thread, if you don't our randomness. :happy:
Modifié par Alexine, 09 juin 2010 - 09:00 .
#25375
Posté 09 juin 2010 - 09:27
Nilfalasiel wrote...
About sexy voices: Thane just doesn't do it for me. It's strange, because he should; he's got the same kind of velvety voice with a touch of raucousness as Garrus...but he just ends up sounding like he gargles cement every morning, to me.
Whenever I talked to Thane I caught myself constantly clearing my throat, maybe out of hope that he might get the hint and do the same =/
I'm pretty sure Brandon Keener could read the text in my old high school maths book and i would still salivate




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




