Aller au contenu

Garrus Love and Adoration v.2


27956 réponses à ce sujet

#10751
Flammie

Flammie
  • Members
  • 892 messages
I think politically, there is a lot of racial tension between the two races, but it doesn't stop people or organisations from slipping under the radar and forming relationships and liasons... I can see some support for Shepard and Garrus, and some criticisms for it from all sorts of people.

Hmm, entered the second romance stage with Garrus. Now he'll be bringing me wine. As for the headbump, it does seem like a headbump, the wiki calls it "affectionately rubbing their heads together". Shepard's hair does appear to be a problem though, it makes Garrus go to the front. Clipping seems to be quite an issue. I see Garrus nibbling on his broken collar, even.

Yeah, Riot's screenshots are amazing. I wonder who has downloaded them. The camera angling in them are really good, and Riot's even managed to get shots that you couldn't normally get (Main character aiming at the screen instead of facing straight forward). Plus, Main Character Garrus.

enormousmoonboots wrote...

Hilariously, drinking too much makes Shepard sober. In Kasumi's bar or the one on Illium, drinking makes the screen increasingly jiggly until you take one more drink and it snaps you right back to normal. If only real life worked like that...


That'd be pretty fun, actually.

"Where's all the alcohol, Flamme?"
"...I'm underage and sober,"
*masses of empty bottles fall out of pockets*

Shotguns and shields, Tali's two greatest strengths in ME1, got nerfed pretty hard in ME2. The regeneration mechanic means that enemies deal lots of damage quickly; fifty extra points of shield won't really help her. Especially since she needs to be close to an enemy to shotgun them effectively (squad AI changes based on what's equipped; shotty or SMG and they run closer to the enemy, sniper rifle and assault rifle and they stay farther away. At least, they're supposed to. GARRUS, STOP THAT). This spells instant death for Tali.

Add to that her skillset is biased towards fighting synthetics (which are plentiful in exactly three story missions, her recruitment, her loyalty, and Legion's loyalty), and she's just not that useful. While Legion has almost the same skillset, his Widow sniper rifle (which is stupidly powerful, I cannot emphasize this enough) and Shield Boost ability means that he's a lot more survivable on the whole. But if you've picked up Legion, you really should be going through the Omega-4 Relay...


I realised that a little while after posting it, but didn't really bother around with editing it out... I guess I'll have to use another character instead, then. Looking at it like that, it doesn't seem as if it'd be any easier if I give Tali a chance...

Diarahan. (have you heard that P3 was remade for the PSP, with a new option for a female main character? It comes over to the US in July, I'm gonna date Shinjiro so hard)
I'm pretty sure P4 doesn't have the Charm status effect at all--and thank God for that. It's also a little easier to fuse no-weakness/elementally resistant Personas.

But if we're going by Persona structure, Garrus can't be the Fool either; the Fool is always the main character and their team. So the Fool would be Shepard and her squad. Still backing Emperor for him, though I guess whether you Paragon/Renegade'd him would be significant in determining his Arcana...I'm kind of tempted to make a topic about this, but I think there are like two other people who've played Persona on the whole forums.

Actually, I think Garrus highlights a big problem in the ME alignment system--it's only got one axis. In the OP, one of (his own?) writers describes him as 'the compassionate Renegade', but a lot of people perceive him as somewhat Paragon. Probably at least a little due to their own projections, but it's notable that there's really only one way to play Paragon (Captain America)--and that one of its defining traits is compassion--but several, sometimes contradictory, ways to play Renegade (some Ren options are xenophobic, some are raging psycho, some are amoral bastard, and some are just pragmatic). The fact that both sides tend to encompass a wide range of contradictory traits is problematic.


Oh, yeah, going by social link structure and who they represent, Fool wouldn't fit Garrus. I was just kinda twisting it around what Fool represents.

Came across P3 on the PSP whilst looking up social links, actually. Sounded interesting.

I'm not sure myself about the Paragon and Renegade choices. It does sound quite contradictory from what's been described of them. I've always been full Paragon, and I do the same for Garrus. I think he embodies a fair few traits that don't contradict each other for the Paragon and the Renegade.

...This seems to be a very closed conversation between us.

Modifié par Flammie, 15 avril 2010 - 10:41 .


#10752
Jackalope

Jackalope
  • Members
  • 356 messages

enormousmoonboots wrote...
Actually, I think Garrus highlights a big problem in the ME alignment system--it's only got one axis. In the OP, one of (his own?) writers describes him as 'the compassionate Renegade', but a lot of people perceive him as somewhat Paragon. Probably at least a little due to their own projections, but it's notable that there's really only one way to play Paragon (Captain America)--and that one of its defining traits is compassion--but several, sometimes contradictory, ways to play Renegade (some Ren options are xenophobic, some are raging psycho, some are amoral bastard, and some are just pragmatic). The fact that both sides tend to encompass a wide range of contradictory traits is problematic.


I like the 'compassionate renegade'.  It suggest 'you hurt nice people and I'm going to have to kill you for that, but I'm not going to be excessive and take out your whole family'.

#10753
aznsoisauce

aznsoisauce
  • Members
  • 1 402 messages
So...It's been 30+ pages since then but I just now realized we've passed 400 pages. HUZZAH!

Arcian wrote...

Arcian wrote...

Umanix wrote...
(which I think would translate roughly into...Mordin dog?


Mordin... advice dog...?

Oh my god, what have I done?

But...there's already Advice!Mordin...!!
Image IPB

But, for the sake of staying "on topic"...
Image IPB
Image IPB

#10754
Skilled Seeker

Skilled Seeker
  • Members
  • 4 433 messages
Image IPB

#10755
janeym27

janeym27
  • Members
  • 1 626 messages

Jackalope wrote...

enormousmoonboots wrote...
Actually, I think Garrus highlights a big problem in the ME alignment system--it's only got one axis. In the OP, one of (his own?) writers describes him as 'the compassionate Renegade', but a lot of people perceive him as somewhat Paragon. Probably at least a little due to their own projections, but it's notable that there's really only one way to play Paragon (Captain America)--and that one of its defining traits is compassion--but several, sometimes contradictory, ways to play Renegade (some Ren options are xenophobic, some are raging psycho, some are amoral bastard, and some are just pragmatic). The fact that both sides tend to encompass a wide range of contradictory traits is problematic.


I like the 'compassionate renegade'.  It suggest 'you hurt nice people and I'm going to have to kill you for that, but I'm not going to be excessive and take out your whole family'.


I like that, but I kind of feel like that's what my paragade Shepard is: she takes care of her own, and looks out for the litle guy, but screw her around or hurt an innocent, and death will come swiftly your way! (or, if you're in authority and being a douche, she will be well snarky at you!)

I agree with the problem with the single axis system - it's not even required. There are some instances where (rarely) other responses appear on the left hand side which answer the person question, and they are a little 'greyer' than the hardline para/rene options. (genophage cure options in Mordins LM, if I remember correctly)

It's interesting that Garrus is the 'compassionate renegade', as to me this suggests one of the many shades of grey which should exist witihin the system, and yet in his head, he "doesn't know what to do with grey". lol I wonder if he knows he is a living grey area. Image IPB

"There no right. There is no wrong. There is only public opinion."

#10756
Flammie

Flammie
  • Members
  • 892 messages
Maybe he sees black and white seperately, and he doesn't mix them together?


Hmm... had a thought about if Garrus played Mass Effect.

Garrus: Hmm... well, I may as well make Shepard like the real-life one.

*Garrus recruitment mission*
Garrus: Ouch... it looks worse from the outside.

*Talking to Garrus*
Garrus: ...Do I really screw off Shepard with calibrations that much?

*Loyalty mission*
Garrus: ...I wonder how it would have went if it went the other way...

*Reach and Flexibility dialogue*
Garrus: Huh? I say that? This hasn't happened yet!
Garrus: ...
Garrus: I... I'm romancing myself?

*little while later*
Shepard: Garrus, what are you doing?
Garrus: C-calibrations!
GameGarrus: I want something to go right. Just once... just...
*Scar stroking*
*headbumping*
Shepard: ...
Garrus: ...
Shepard: ...
Garrus: ...
Shepard: Narcissm isn't a healthy trait, Garrus.
Garrus: I know.
Shepard: Neither is fantasising.
Garrus: ...

Modifié par Flammie, 15 avril 2010 - 11:36 .


#10757
aznsoisauce

aznsoisauce
  • Members
  • 1 402 messages
Speaking of alignments...I recently saw this:
Image IPB

Lawful Good? Garrus? Discuss!

I had thought of my own Shepard as one of the Neutral alignments (particularly chaotic neutral) but according to this quiz, she's Lawful Evil. Like Darth Vader. :whistle:

#10758
Soltana

Soltana
  • Members
  • 768 messages

Flammie wrote...

Maybe he sees black and white seperately, and he doesn't mix them together?


Hmm... had a thought about if Garrus played Mass Effect.

Garrus: Hmm... well, I may as well make Shepard like the real-life one.

*Garrus recruitment mission*
Garrus: Ouch... it looks worse from the outside.

*Talking to Garrus*
Garrus: ...Do I really screw off Shepard with calibrations that much?

*Loyalty mission*
Garrus: ...I wonder how it would have went if it went the other way...

*Reach and Flexibility dialogue*
Garrus: Huh? I say that? This hasn't happened yet!
Garrus: ...
Garrus: I... I'm romancing myself?

*little while later*
Shepard: Garrus, what are you doing?
Garrus: C-calibrations!
GameGarrus: I want something to go right. Just once... just...
*Scar stroking*
*headbumping*
Shepard: ...
Garrus: ...
Shepard: ...
Garrus: ...
Shepard: Narcissm isn't a healthy trait, Garrus.
Garrus: I know.
Shepard: Neither is fantasising.
Garrus: ...


TIEM PARADOCKS!

Image IPB

#10759
Chimervera

Chimervera
  • Members
  • 335 messages

aznsoisauce wrote...

Speaking of alignments...I recently saw this:

*snip*

Lawful Good? Garrus? Discuss!

I had thought of my own Shepard as one of the Neutral alignments (particularly chaotic neutral) but according to this quiz, she's Lawful Evil. Like Darth Vader. :whistle:


Garrus definitely isn't Lawful, since he hated the red tape in C-Sec, and then became a vigilante (very un-Lawful). I see his father being more of a Lawful Good, seeing as he disapproves of spectres because they are outside the law. I think Garrus would be a Chaotic Good or maybe a Neutral Good.

The quiz says that I am/my Shpeard is a tie between a Chaotic Good and Lawful Evil (75%). Talk about contradictory! I also received a high score in Chaotic Neutral (70%) and another tie with True Neutral and Chaotic Evil (60%)! It doesn't seem to be a good judge of character, though the high number of Chaotics seems fairly accurate :P The tiebreaker gave me Chaotic Good though, so heres the description:

A Chaotic Good person is someone who has little intrinsic respect for laws or authority, seeing them as insufficient to sustain what's right. These people work according to their own moral compass which, while
good, is not necessarily always aligned with that of society. Despite their chaotic tendancies, these people are good at heart.


That seems pretty Garrus-like to me. I think he would respect the law more than this implies, even though it's insufficient - I think he sees the value in them, it's just the execution of them that fails people (e.g the corrupt C-Sec officers). His moral compass can be more "aligned with that of society" if you paragon him, but this seems to be perfect for a renegaded Garrus and still fits pretty well for a paragon'd Garrus.

I don't have time to go back through it right now to get Neutral Good, but this seems like a good fit.

Modifié par Chimervera, 15 avril 2010 - 12:18 .


#10760
Guest_Arcian_*

Guest_Arcian_*
  • Guests
Lawful Evil.



What the hell.



I specifically pointed out that I wanted to help people, that i did not like to hurt people and that laws should be bent when necessary... yet still i get Lawful Evil.



Fail quiz if you ask me. :(

#10761
smecky-kitteh

smecky-kitteh
  • Members
  • 3 725 messages

Chimervera wrote...

aznsoisauce wrote...

Speaking of alignments...I recently saw this:

*snip*

Lawful Good? Garrus? Discuss!

I had thought of my own Shepard as one of the Neutral alignments (particularly chaotic neutral) but according to this quiz, she's Lawful Evil. Like Darth Vader. :whistle:


Garrus definitely isn't Lawful, since he hated the red tape in C-Sec, and then became a vigilante (very un-Lawful). I see his father being more of a Lawful Good, seeing as he disapproves of spectres because they are outside the law. I think Garrus would be a Chaotic Good or maybe a Neutral Good.

The quiz says that I am/my Shpeard is a tie between a Chaotic Good and Lawful Evil (75%). Talk about contradictory! I also received a high score in Chaotic Neutral (70%) and another tie with True Neutral and Chaotic Evil (60%)! It doesn't seem to be a good judge of character, though the high number of Chaotics seems fairly accurate :P The tiebreaker gave me Chaotic Good though, so heres the description:

A Chaotic Good person is someone who has little intrinsic respect for laws or authority, seeing them as insufficient to sustain what's right. These people work according to their own moral compass which, while
good, is not necessarily always aligned with that of society. Despite their chaotic tendancies, these people are good at heart.


That seems pretty Garrus-like to me. I think he would respect the law more than this implies, even though it's insufficient - I think he sees the value in them, it's just the execution of them that fails people (e.g the corrupt C-Sec officers). His moral compass can be more "aligned with that of society" if you paragon him, but this seems to be perfect for a renegaded Garrus and still fits pretty well for a paragon'd Garrus.

I don't have time to go back through it right now to get Neutral Good, but this seems like a good fit.


i am lawful evil. good! i always thought i had a very vigilanty mindset:devil: 

#10762
Xalena

Xalena
  • Members
  • 377 messages

Chimervera wrote...

aznsoisauce wrote...

Speaking of alignments...I recently saw this:

*snip*

Lawful Good? Garrus? Discuss!

I had thought of my own Shepard as one of the Neutral alignments (particularly chaotic neutral) but according to this quiz, she's Lawful Evil. Like Darth Vader. :whistle:


Garrus definitely isn't Lawful, since he hated the red tape in C-Sec, and then became a vigilante (very un-Lawful). I see his father being more of a Lawful Good, seeing as he disapproves of spectres because they are outside the law. I think Garrus would be a Chaotic Good or maybe a Neutral Good.


Taken from Alignment (D&D) Wiki
"Lawful Good
Lawful Good is known as the "Saintly" or "Crusader" alignment. A
Lawful Good character typically acts with compassion, and always with
honor and a sense of duty. A Lawful Good nation would consist of a
well-organized government that works for the benefit of its citizens.
Lawful Good characters include righteous knights, paladins, and most
dwarves. Lawful Good creatures include the noble golden dragons. Lawful
Good outsiders are known as Archons.
Lawful Good characters, especially paladins, may sometimes find
themselves faced with the dilemma of whether to obey law or good when
the two conflict - for example, upholding a sworn oath when it would
lead innocents to come to harm - or conflicts between two orders, such
as between their religious law and the law of the local ruler.
In the Complete Scoundrel sourcebook Batman, Dick Tracy and Indiana Jones are cited as examples of lawful good characters.[7] "

edit: @quiz

You Scored as True Neutral
A True
Neutral person has two faces (true I am gemini in horoscope :P)- either these people are merely apathetic,
preferring to focus their minds on more important things, or these
people truly believe in a balance of all things. To these people, there
can be no light without some darkness. These people also have no
dedication to, or intrinsic distrust of, laws.

Modifié par Xalena, 15 avril 2010 - 12:29 .


#10763
smecky-kitteh

smecky-kitteh
  • Members
  • 3 725 messages

aznsoisauce wrote...

Speaking of alignments...I recently saw this:
Image IPB

Lawful Good? Garrus? Discuss!

I had thought of my own Shepard as one of the Neutral alignments (particularly chaotic neutral) but according to this quiz, she's Lawful Evil. Like Darth Vader. :whistle:


ive always though garrus to be a lawful evil kind of person. saren and morinth are just friggen evil.

#10764
Soltana

Soltana
  • Members
  • 768 messages
Lawful Evil right here. I think this fits Garrus a little better than Lawful Good but Chaotic Good fits even better methinks.

#10765
Chimervera

Chimervera
  • Members
  • 335 messages

Xalena wrote...

Chimervera wrote...

aznsoisauce wrote...

Speaking of alignments...I recently saw this:

*snip*

Lawful Good? Garrus? Discuss!

I had thought of my own Shepard as one of the Neutral alignments (particularly chaotic neutral) but according to this quiz, she's Lawful Evil. Like Darth Vader. :whistle:


Garrus definitely isn't Lawful, since he hated the red tape in C-Sec, and then became a vigilante (very un-Lawful). I see his father being more of a Lawful Good, seeing as he disapproves of spectres because they are outside the law. I think Garrus would be a Chaotic Good or maybe a Neutral Good.


Taken from Alignment (D&D) Wiki
"Lawful Good
Lawful Good is known as the "Saintly" or "Crusader" alignment. A Lawful Good character typically acts with compassion, and always with honor and a sense of duty. A Lawful Good nation would consist of a well-organized government that works for the benefit of its citizens. Lawful Good characters include righteous knights, paladins, and most dwarves. Lawful Good creatures include the noble golden dragons. Lawful Good outsiders are known as Archons.
Lawful Good characters, especially paladins, may sometimes find themselves faced with the dilemma of whether to obey law or good when the two conflict - for example, upholding a sworn oath when it would lead innocents to come to harm - or conflicts between two orders, such as between their religious law and the law of the local ruler.
In the Complete Scoundrel sourcebook Batman, Dick Tracy and Indiana Jones are cited as examples of lawful good characters.[7] "


Huh, I guess that the alignments have warped since they were taken from D&D (I've never played it, since I don't know anyone who is interested in tabletop gaming), because a Lawful Good was described to me as  someone who truly believes in the law and will go to great lengths to uphold it - even if it may not be the best choice - and hates any form of lawlessness, law-breaking or law-bending - and the very existence of spectres bends the law, if not outright breaks them. Garrus idolised the spectres, and has shown a willingness to break the law to catch a criminal, (Dr. Saleon story - he was willing to sacrifice civilians to catch the criminal)

That description, however, fits a paragon Garrus pretty well. I think Chaotic Good would suit a renegade Garrus better.

Modifié par Chimervera, 15 avril 2010 - 12:40 .


#10766
aznsoisauce

aznsoisauce
  • Members
  • 1 402 messages
Re: contradictory alignment matching
It's a funny thing...opposites are similar (ha, another contradiction!). It's like that saying about the thin line between love and hate...

--

Xalena wrote...

Chimervera wrote...

aznsoisauce wrote...

Speaking of alignments...I recently saw this:

*snip*

Lawful Good? Garrus? Discuss!

I had thought of my own Shepard as one of the Neutral alignments (particularly chaotic neutral) but according to this quiz, she's Lawful Evil. Like Darth Vader. :whistle:


Garrus definitely isn't Lawful, since he hated the red tape in C-Sec, and then became a vigilante (very un-Lawful). I see his father being more of a Lawful Good, seeing as he disapproves of spectres because they are outside the law. I think Garrus would be a Chaotic Good or maybe a Neutral Good.


Taken from Alignment (D&D) Wiki
"Lawful Good
Lawful Good is known as the "Saintly" or "Crusader" alignment. A
Lawful Good character typically acts with compassion, and always with
honor and a sense of duty. A Lawful Good nation would consist of a
well-organized government that works for the benefit of its citizens.
Lawful Good characters include righteous knights, paladins, and most
dwarves. Lawful Good creatures include the noble golden dragons. Lawful
Good outsiders are known as Archons.
Lawful Good characters, especially paladins, may sometimes find
themselves faced with the dilemma of whether to obey law or good when
the two conflict - for example, upholding a sworn oath when it would
lead innocents to come to harm - or conflicts between two orders, such
as between their religious law and the law of the local ruler.
In the Complete Scoundrel sourcebook Batman, Dick Tracy and Indiana Jones are cited as examples of lawful good characters.[7] "

The very mention of Batman is a powerful argument considering how often we liken Garrus' vigilante ways to the dark knight.

Buuuut...I personally have an issue with associating him with lawful good due to his occasional recklessness to do what's right and do what it takes to get it done.

#10767
Daewan

Daewan
  • Members
  • 1 876 messages

Chimervera wrote...

Huh, I guess that the alignments have warped since they were taken from D&D (I've never played it, since I don't know anyone who is interested in tabletop gaming), because a Lawful Good was described to me as  someone who truly believes in the law and will go to great lengths to uphold it - even if it may not be the best choice - and hates any form of lawlessness, law-breaking or law-bending - and the very existence of spectres bends the law, if not outright breaks them.


The alignments have definitely warped.  It's the same reasoning behind changing the scene where Han shoots first, they redefined the alignment descriptions so more players would convince themselves to play LG and think "I'm Batman!" instead of old school where a player wanting to be like Batman or Han Solo would be a lawbreaker and probably NG.

That chart and the new descriptions offend my dice-loving soul.  *sob*

#10768
Ohem85

Ohem85
  • Members
  • 17 messages

Ohem85 wrote...

 I found this one, pretty funny with femshep and Garrus :)

Image IPB


And here it is again, just to annoy you guys :)

#10769
Chimervera

Chimervera
  • Members
  • 335 messages
More alignment descriptions, from the Wikipedia entry linked above:

Neutral Good
Neutral Good is known as the "Benefactor" alignment. A Neutral Good character is guided by his conscience and typically acts altruistically, without regard for or against Lawful precepts such as rules or tradition. A Neutral Good character has no problems with co-operating with lawful officials, but does not feel beholden to them. In the event that doing the right thing requires the bending or breaking of rules, they do not suffer the same inner conflict that a Lawful Good character would.
Examples of Neutral Good characters include Zorro, and Spider-Man.

Chaotic Good
Chaotic Good is known as the "Beatific," "Rebel," or "Cynic" alignment. A Chaotic Good character favors change for a greater good, disdains bureaucratic organizations that get in the way of social improvement, and places a high value on personal freedom, not only for oneself, but for others as well. They always intend to do the right
thing, but their methods are generally disorganised and often out of alignment with the rest of society. They have no use for those who would try to push them around and tell them what to do.While they do not have evil intentions, they may do bad things (even though they will not enjoy doing these things) to people who are, in
their opinion, bad people, if it benefits the greater good. Most elves are Chaotic Good, as are some fey.
Starbuck from Battlestar Galactica, Malcolm Reynolds from Firefly, and Robin Hood are examples of Chaotic Good individuals


These seems to fit better than a Lawful Good, IMO. After reading these, I feel like they're toning down the lawfullness of Lawful Good :?

I think Garrus is definitely a Neutral Good. I want to say that he's a Chaotic Good, but that could just be the awesomeness of Starbuck and Malcolm Reynolds influencing me, so I'd need a second opinion :P

Modifié par Chimervera, 15 avril 2010 - 12:56 .


#10770
Guest_Arcian_*

Guest_Arcian_*
  • Guests

Ohem85 wrote...

And here it is again, just to annoy you guys :)


Ohem85 wrote...

annoy

Image IPB
Confused here.

#10771
Xalena

Xalena
  • Members
  • 377 messages

Ohem85 wrote...

Ohem85 wrote...

 I found this one, pretty funny with femshep and Garrus :)

*snip*


And here it is again, just to annoy you guys :)


Image IPB

#10772
Soltana

Soltana
  • Members
  • 768 messages

Ohem85 wrote...

And here it is again, just to annoy you guys :)


Image IPB

#10773
Chimervera

Chimervera
  • Members
  • 335 messages
I think this would be an appropriate time to post this image, especially since it's predecessor was posted earlier:

Image IPB

(By *artofdawn)

EDIT: Just saw this on the LJ comm; someone has found a way to mod the 360 version of ME2. It's been mentioned before in here, so I thought I'd put it where more will see it.
Just beware of consequences. They were discussed on LJ here. (It's a bit long to just copy-paste)

And with that, I leave for the night! It's nearing midnight and I have to be up early. I look forward to reading more posts in the morning :D

Modifié par Chimervera, 15 avril 2010 - 01:14 .


#10774
Xalena

Xalena
  • Members
  • 377 messages

Chimervera wrote...

These seems to fit better than a Lawful Good, IMO. After reading these, I feel like they're toning down the lawfullness of Lawful Good :?

I think Garrus is definitely a Neutral Good. I want to say that he's a Chaotic Good, but that could just be the awesomeness of Starbuck and Malcolm Reynolds influencing me, so I'd need a second opinion :P


back on the topic...

Damn lol Garrus is a person with over nine thoussand alignments! We'll never be bored with him :D!

Modifié par Xalena, 15 avril 2010 - 01:09 .


#10775
aznsoisauce

aznsoisauce
  • Members
  • 1 402 messages

Ohem85 wrote...
And here it is again, just to annoy you guys :)

Image IPB

--

Somewhat on topic:
My favorite character from Heavy Rain was the delicious FBI Agent Norman Jayden. Why? He's got the cowboy cop thing goin on. He wears high-tech head gear. Nerdy/Geeky. Has the best lines in the game. Lovely light-colored eyes. Oh, and he's got a sexy voice.

WAITAMINUTE.