I don't know: the whole point with Thane is that you
know he's doomed. It adds weight to his character and defines his role and his point of view: he's there to make his final actions matter in the greater scheme of things (saving lives rather than taking them) and make you question your own morality in the meantime. The fact that he's speaking from the threshold of the grave gives him more significance. It also makes his romance unique and poignant, for those that have the guts to go through with it. Curing him would seem like a cop out to me. Maybe I'm heartless, but like I said: the ones who romanced him can't just ignore the huge "BY THE WAY, I'M DYING" neon sign he holds out to you in your very first convo with him and hope it'll somehow magically go away. I don't normally defend rampant character death, but it seems like, in this case, it's necessary for his character's integrity.
Then again, it's true that he didn't get a lot of screentime in ME2, so killing him off in 3 would feel a bit like a reiteration of the Nihlus syndrome: "hey, look! awesome mystical assassin sniper dude! oops, he's dead, LOLZ".

Like I said, I'm conflicted about Thane. Maybe they could make him live through ME3 and die at the end? I really don't know which would be the better outcome.
Modifié par Nilfalasiel, 10 mai 2010 - 04:28 .