Ah, the old ‘Garrus is whiney’ argument has been bandied about these forums plenty. Actually, I’ve heard quite a few ‘everyone is whiney’ arguments across various threads. To that, I always refer people to Samara. During one of the conversations you can have with her about her family (I forget which one) the renegade dialogue response option reads “cry me a river”. Selecting this prompts Samara to say something along the lines of: I’m not looking for sympathy. You asked me, so I’m telling you. If it bothers you, I’ll stop.
What people are calling ‘whining’ is a response to an honest question.
Garrus actually has the least to say about his personal life, IMO. Considering everything that has gone down (and the history between him and Shep if you played ME1 the best way), he is remarkably quiet. He explains how he came to be holed up on Omega (answer to a question), then tells Shep about Sidonus and asks for help in solving a problem (action, not whining). After Sidonus, well, it’s all reach, flexibility and sex research. Very little whining to be had. Let’s face it, Garrus is not all that much of a ‘personal issues’ talker. Even in ME1 when complaining about C-Sec, it’s in juxtaposition to what he is doing with Shepard. He has a problem, he fixes it (hence the C-Sec frustration in the 1st place).
I’ve got no problem with people liking disliking whatever characters they want for whatever reasons they want (well, let’s not get silly about it), but sometimes it does feel like people are making reasons up. Like: they want to hate on a character, so they hate first, reason it out second. I think that by and large all of the ME characters are well written enough that even if you find a particular character’s motives or actions disdainful, you can appreciate that they are a good character, just maybe not your cup of tea. I only really find myself ‘hating’ a character if I feel like they are shallow, or don’t quite fit the universe. In ME, this is a rare thing indeed.
I don’t think it’s fair to say Garrus is too easily moulded (people also complain that the ‘lesson from ME1 never stuck’ so I guess some people just want to be unhappy). He listens to Shepard, and takes advice, but ultimately the decision is his. Shepard literally has to stand between him and Sidonus to stop him taking the shot, and lets Sidonus explain himself. Shep doesn’t ask Garrus not to kill Sidonus, but points out that Sidonus isn’t worth the bullet. Garrus makes the choice (and lives with the consequences, either way). This interaction is a by-product of his friendship with Shepard, not a result of him being unable to act unguided (although, I’ll admit, I think his state of mind post-betrayal may be lacking in self-confidence regarding his decisions, which may make him a tad more susceptible to the advice of a trusted friend). I see it as a back and forth in ME2. Garrus is one of the characters that calls Shepard on his/her BS as well. One of my fave character moments is if you take him to get the IFF. When you go to take Legion, he warns Shepard off. When Shepard disagrees with him, he says “You know the risks. That’s all I’m saying.” (I know he’s not the only character with something to say here, but the way he says it really struck me.) He also cautions Shep on Cerberus, and during battle tends to offer useful tactical advice (well, maybe I’m biased, but his ‘if we head to the left we can flank them’, etc, is advice well placed. I don’t seem to notice the others being as helpful. They probably are, but like I sai, I don’t notice it. Lol) Basically, I think he and Shepard, paragon or renegade, are on an fairly even keel by ME2.
Re: Garrus HTL death order. I was surprised he died so early on, but I guess the selfless action thing makes sense (mind you, can you imagine if he sacrificed himself to save the likes of Monrith or Zaeed? My Shepards would be universally unimpressed! Not wanting to hate on them, but I can't see them returning the favor to Gar. And he's too awesome to sacrifice!). It’s actually quite cool that they would take character personality into consideration when working that order out, not just defence score (at least, I’m assuming they must have, because Garrus scores pretty high for HTL numbers).
I know it was pages ago, and OT, but regarding the Thane thing: I think it’s perfectly possible to keep him dying AND have a happy ending. Collider’s ‘make it ambiguous’ thing works, but they could also have a whole Shepard and Thane are going to make the most of what time they have left together thing (technically, no one knows exactly when they are going to die anyway). I don’t think you necessarily need a whole ‘huzzah! He’s cured!’ revelation for this to be upbeat.
I hope we get several different endings in ME3. Happy/sad/catastrophic…. And Romance or bromance, Garrus and Shepard will be sniping happily together until the end!
Pacifien wrote...
His choice in wine is substandard and he is tone deaf when it comes to musical seduction.
Um… champagne is pretty nice (he got the
best he could afford!), and are you implying that stripper Flux music isn’t sexy as all hell? I know I was impressed. (Damn! Garrus got some moves! )
Also, the
wine he shares a name with is ‘probably the best rose wine in the world’. So… there!
Also, slow calibrator?
Thorough calibrator, I think you mean. (We all saw what happened on Horizon due to sloppy calibrations). cocky sniper?
AWESOME sniper. Eyepiece looks stupid? Eyepiece looks
damn sexy. And is practical too.
… etc, etc, I think I’ve made my case.
