you have a point:?Sialater wrote...
Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...
Sialater wrote...
No, let's not retaliate, that way lies flame wars and banning.
Not flame them silly, we show them a trippy garrus picture of our own.
They might find something WORSE to send back.
Garrus Love and Adoration v.2
#21176
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:34
#21177
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:39
Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...
you have a point:?Sialater wrote...
Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...
Sialater wrote...
No, let's not retaliate, that way lies flame wars and banning.
Not flame them silly, we show them a trippy garrus picture of our own.
They might find something WORSE to send back.
These ARE the Talimancers, BG.
#21178
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:44
Who is the Deadliest Warrior?

Talimancers are able to post ridiculously fast and has large numbers, but clan vakarian has a large number of alcholics and psychos due to drinking to much garrus's wine and mountain due. Clan vakarian also has the tendency to post walls of text.
#21179
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:47
Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...
Clan Vakarian vs. Talimancers
Who is the Deadliest Warrior?
Talimancers are able to post ridiculously fast and has large numbers, but clan vakarian has a large number of alcholics and psychos due to drinking to much garrus's wine and mountain due. Clan vakarian also has the tendency to post walls of text.
We avoid Rule 34 pictures, though. At least the tasteless ones.
#21180
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:48
Woo doesn’t like that vs. **** be careful.Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...
Clan Vakarian vs. Talimancers
Who is the Deadliest Warrior?
Talimancers are able to post ridiculously fast and has large numbers, but clan vakarian has a large number of alcholics and psychos due to drinking to much garrus's wine and mountain due. Clan vakarian also has the tendency to post walls of text.
#21181
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:51
Sand King wrote...
Woo doesn’t like that vs. **** be careful.Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...
Clan Vakarian vs. Talimancers
Who is the Deadliest Warrior?
Talimancers are able to post ridiculously fast and has large numbers, but clan vakarian has a large number of alcholics and psychos due to drinking to much garrus's wine and mountain due. Clan vakarian also has the tendency to post walls of text.
And he also hates The Deadliest Warrior. A show with only vs stuff?! That's outrageous!
#21182
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:52
When my Earthborn Ruthless Shepard goes through this conversation (he'll make Sidonis talk and then let Garrus kill him), he would just smile and say, "Good." Too bad that's probably not an option. xD And no, the Earthborn Ruthless is not Evil Shepard. He's Renegon.Cerrydd wrote...
silentstephi wrote...
Because no where in the conversation does Sidonus say what he did was wrong, I don't think he's redeemable.
But, that's just my opinion.
Other's may vary.
No, he doesnt say "What I did was wrong". You have to read between the lines. He says "I know what I did. I know they died because of me, and I have to live with that" which results in a major depressive episode. He has nightmares, food doesn't taste good anymore, wants to die. Someone who has no problem with what he's done don't experience this. I can almost diagnose him with PTSD.
But yeah, long live opinions. I can't believe I'm still going on about this
My favorite thing about Mass Effect is the many different ways it can be played.
Also, that new Garrus banner is awesome.
#21183
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 06:58
#21184
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:50
#21185
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:51
Is that moving picture Happy Garrus?Xsause wrote...
This is what I do when I'm bored:
#21186
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:52
I know it's a dead horse, one that even I kind of just roll my eyes at, the whole Garrus turning into Saren thing (of which I'm of the opinion that Shepard is much more of a candidate for that than Garrus ever would be...) but if there's an unsavory turian that Garrus had the potential of turning out to be...
It's Warden Kuril.
Think about it. Kuril was a law enforcement officer on Palaven, then went Merc to keep the baddies in space. It probably started out as his "righteous" goal, but the power, or money, turned him. Something made him go sour. But his original reasons ring true for a Garrus who wants justice in the galaxy and can't be bothered with red tape/stupid governments to make the "hard choices" and keep criminals in jail.
Thoughts?
#21187
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:52
Kim Shepard wrote...
Is that moving picture Happy Garrus?Xsause wrote...
This is what I do when I'm bored:
Yep.
#21188
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:58
It's a possiblity, yea. I just hope they don't go that route with Garrus if you renegaded him. For one thing that would mean my canon Shepard would no longer have the same Garrus to brofist with. For another thing I'd probably consider making Garrus like Kuril as character assassination. I'd rather renegading Garrus either keep him as is (since Shepar is basically just agreeing with him anyway) or just makes him more ruthless while dealing with criminals, a little less tolerance for their sins.silentstephi wrote...
Eh, it can be argued too that I don't think he even thinks what he did was wrong. But I'd have to gather my brain cells for that one to make sense. (Talking about Sid.)
I know it's a dead horse, one that even I kind of just roll my eyes at, the whole Garrus turning into Saren thing (of which I'm of the opinion that Shepard is much more of a candidate for that than Garrus ever would be...) but if there's an unsavory turian that Garrus had the potential of turning out to be...
It's Warden Kuril.
Think about it. Kuril was a law enforcement officer on Palaven, then went Merc to keep the baddies in space. It probably started out as his "righteous" goal, but the power, or money, turned him. Something made him go sour. But his original reasons ring true for a Garrus who wants justice in the galaxy and can't be bothered with red tape/stupid governments to make the "hard choices" and keep criminals in jail.
Thoughts?
#21189
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:58
#21190
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:58
silentstephi wrote...
Eh, it can be argued too that I don't think he even thinks what he did was wrong. But I'd have to gather my brain cells for that one to make sense. (Talking about Sid.)
I know it's a dead horse, one that even I kind of just roll my eyes at, the whole Garrus turning into Saren thing (of which I'm of the opinion that Shepard is much more of a candidate for that than Garrus ever would be...) but if there's an unsavory turian that Garrus had the potential of turning out to be...
It's Warden Kuril.
Think about it. Kuril was a law enforcement officer on Palaven, then went Merc to keep the baddies in space. It probably started out as his "righteous" goal, but the power, or money, turned him. Something made him go sour. But his original reasons ring true for a Garrus who wants justice in the galaxy and can't be bothered with red tape/stupid governments to make the "hard choices" and keep criminals in jail.
Thoughts?
I thought of that, too, when I did Jack's recruitment mission recently. Especially if he could rationalize the money as being needed to fund his efforts at cleaning up the galaxy.
#21191
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:59
We're currently talking about how renegading Garrus may affect him in ME3.Andaius20 wrote...
hey Garrus folks, how's it going? Anything new and exciting being talked about?
#21192
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 07:59
#21193
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 08:07
I don't think he would become like Warden Kuril either. Giant prison in space? Maybe. Selling off criminals to whoever pays the most credits? No. Once he caught the criminals (although, if Shepard pushes him Renegade, he'd be more likely to just kill them), he wouldn't let them go. For all Kuril knows, most of those criminals were probably bought by wealthy crime bosses to commit more crimes.
Awesome.Xsause wrote...
Kim Shepard wrote...
Is that moving picture Happy Garrus?Xsause wrote...
This is what I do when I'm bored:
Yep.
Modifié par Kim Shepard, 20 mai 2010 - 08:07 .
#21194
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 08:13
#21195
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 08:34
#21196
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 08:42
I don't think Garrus would have the inclination to start his own Purgatory 2.0. Just that considering Turian mindset and that there's others out there who also don't have the patience for bureaucrats.
#21197
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 09:22
#21198
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 09:22
But it was amusing to see my Earthborn Shepard tell her "Not everyone's as close to their family as you." after she said she didn't buy Liara's story about not talking to her mother in years. xD
I tried to be pretty careful in his conversation with Liara too. He chose quite a few of the lines that say he doesn't completely trust her yet because of Benezia ("We'll see" and "Maybe she's just evil" are the two I remember). At the part where she sounds like she wants to study him, he took the middle "that was a joke" option.
On topic... I still think Garrus is more of a "Paragade", even when Shepard chooses both Renegade options on his missions. Sometimes he'll sacrifice innocents for the good of the mission, like how he wanted to shoot down Saleon's ship with the hostages inside - but like he said, Saleon was just going to experiment on those people, and they were probably wishing they were dead anyway. The way he saw it, more people were going to die in the long run if they let Saleon escape. Anyway, I doubt Garrus will even get as bad as Renegade Shepard.
#21199
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 09:25
silentstephi wrote...
It's not that I think Garrus would follow EXACTLY in Kuril's footsteps. But more like, Kuril is an example of someone who started off with the right reasons/goal but either time, money or power has soured them.
I don't think Garrus would have the inclination to start his own Purgatory 2.0. Just that considering Turian mindset and that there's others out there who also don't have the patience for bureaucrats.
Well consitering his actions in ME 2 he would need a jail he would just kill them all.
#21200
Posté 20 mai 2010 - 09:26
Actually, I think more people in this thread paragoned him.Talifan wrote...
Huh, I must be weird for not renegading Garrus, I usually paragoned him
Unless all of the Shepards I have planned out are counted as individuals. That would throw the balance way off. xD




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




