27956 réponses à ce sujet

[Fia_Bobia]

Sialater wrote...

Fia1618 wrote...

Honest inquiry, who would like to see some NSFW pictures I drew of my femshep and Garrus?
Oh what am I saying, of course you would.
I just need your consent before I subject you to my smutty scribbles.

I'm at work, so not right now.  But you'd have to PM them to anyone.

Oh really? ok. How do I do that?

[silentstephi]

Or you could put it here. I coming up with new threads. ^.^

Modifié par silentstephi, 04 juin 2010 - 02:00 .

[Fia_Bobia]

YAY!

[Nilfalasiel]

"Ah yes, NSFW. We have dismissed that claim." You guys should see what's going on in the Zevran thread...

...on second thought, maybe you shouldn't...

They're certainly not afraid of the Banhammer. It seems that *it* happens every Friday...

And today's *it* involves ropes and leather.

Ahem. So, Garrus, mind handing me some of that wine to wash that down?

[Pacifien]

Nilfalasiel wrote...
"Ah yes, NSFW. We have dismissed that claim." You guys should see what's going on in the Zevran thread...

...on second thought, maybe you shouldn't...

They're certainly not afraid of the Banhammer. It seems that *it* happens every Friday...

And today's *it* involves ropes and leather.

*runs to the zevran thread*

[Christmas Ape]

Nilfalasiel wrote...

"Ah yes, NSFW. We have dismissed that claim." You guys should see what's going on in the Zevran thread...

...on second thought, maybe you shouldn't...

They're certainly not afraid of the Banhammer. It seems that *it* happens every Friday...

And today's *it* involves ropes and leather.

Almost makes me wish I could make myself care about Dragon Age...

Mostly it gives me hope for The Good Stuff delivering.

[Cerrydd]

Oh, uhm, wow. Zevran fans are kinky. I am so not into that stuff XD. I'm not into Zevran either, lol.

So yeah. Garrus.





I'm still trying to draw a dog.

[Sialater]

I don't think I can handle that thread any more. I used to go there to research Zevran.



I'm going to hide behind Garrus now.

[lovgreno]

Well considering Zevrans dialogue it probably had end as a NSFW soaked thread, Us fans are silly people but I think I prefer the kind of silly Garrus fans are. That said I must admit I had to take a look at the Zevran thread after reading what Nialaself wrote:
"Ah yes, NSFW. We have dismissed that claim." You guys should see what's going on in the Zevran thread...
Mildly amusing but not my thing.

Modifié par lovgreno, 04 juin 2010 - 03:23 .

[Nilfalasiel]

Lol, yeah, it gets a bit much for me too at times. I didn't remember it being quite so uhm...explicit back when I started lurking there. But it seems that I started posting right in the middle of a kink explosion or something.

Eh well, there are still interesting discussions and insights happening, in between the smut. And I managed to make the resident Zev expert on there start playing ME. I advertised Garrus as being one of the best characters in the whole series  

And your Garri are adorable, Cerrydd

Modifié par Nilfalasiel, 04 juin 2010 - 03:24 .

[Collider]

www.youtube.com/watch

I now understand those references...

If I hear Garrus say "Dude, you're a genius!" to my M!Shepard in ME3, my head may explode from the awesome. Do it, Bioware!

Modifié par Collider, 04 juin 2010 - 03:30 .

[Collider]

Alright, Garrus morality question time...



What do you think Garrus would advocate in the following scenarios?



1. Toombs

2. Samesh Bhatia

3. Consort (Would Garrus even think helping her would be worthwhile? Etc)

4. Chorban/Jahleed

5. Rita's sister

6. Doctor Michel

7. I Remember Me (Colonist)

8. Jacob's father

[Sialater]

1. Toombs
I utterly failed Toombs in my last Sole Survivor game, Toombs shot himself and the scientist, Meghan was a sad panda.  And I think it depends on how you handled Saleon for him, at least for the scientist.  Toombs just plain old needs help.

2. Samesh Bhatia
I think he'd want the body to stay with the Alliance.  I always get her returned though.

3. Consort (Would Garrus even think helping her would be worthwhile? Etc)
Given his reaction to the general, I think he thinks the whole thing is a waste of time.

4. Chorban/Jahleed
Bad Idea.

5. Rita's sister
Definitely need to help her, but he'd probably screw up Chellick's investigation since at that time (in my game at least) he was all about bringing in all the bad guys he could.

6. Doctor Michel
Which time?

7. I Remember Me (Colonist)
I think he'd be out of his depth with this one. 

8. Jacob's father
This one I'm still asking myself about it.  Mainly because it still pisses me off (and my Sheps, by extension).

[Fia_Bobia]

Because these are safe

[Cerrydd]

Collider wrote...

www.youtube.com/watch

I now understand those references...

If I hear Garrus say "Dude, you're a genius!" to my M!Shepard in ME3, my head may explode from the awesome. Do it, Bioware!

lol, now you know? XD But yes, if BW puts that line in the game, I think the entire world will explode from the awesome. All those comments on Youtube are funny haha.

The Consort thing, I agree with Sialater. Helping the Consort is not something on his to-do list I guess. Especially his reaction to the heart-broken Septimus. What can a woman do to get you into this state? Well buddy, wait two years and get rejected by Shep. Then you know .

Rita's sister, he wants to get her out. IIRC, he comments on that to Chellick. But I think he wouldn't just give Jax the money and let him be.

Jacob's dad will probably disgust him, just like everyone else. Don't know what he would do with him if he had the choice though. But I don't think he would lose sleep over it when Taylor senior gets killed.

The other ones... no idea.

[Nilfalasiel]

Collider wrote...

What do you think Garrus would advocate in the following scenarios?

1. Toombs
2. Samesh Bhatia
3. Consort (Would Garrus even think helping her would be worthwhile? Etc)
4. Chorban/Jahleed
5. Rita's sister
6. Doctor Michel
7. I Remember Me (Colonist)
8. Jacob's father

1. He'd probably attempt to talk him down at least.

2. Hmm...Back at the time of ME1, he might've argued for the body to stay with the Alliance. But after having to put his own team in body bags? He might've changed his outlook somewhat.

3. He'd think it's a waste of time, I agree. He's really not into subtle diplomacy.

4. In ME1, he'd arrest them both. In ME2, he just wouldn't bother with them.

5. He'd try to talk Chellick into pulling her from the case. But he wouldn't agree to the smuggling: probably attempt to pull her out of Chora's Den on his own.

6. He'd fight that merc (the one who appears when you talk to Morlan). Since y'know, we already know how he reacts during the first Dr Michel incident.

7. He would definitely not know how to negociate this one. Maybe he'd load tranq darts into his rifle and try to snipe her from a distance?

8. Depends if you Paragoned or Renegaded him, whether you did Sidonis first or not. If Paragoned, he'd give him the gun to shoot himself. He might also just arrest him, since it's less of an emotional issue for him. If Renegaded, he'd probably throw him to the crazies. Reap what you sow, and all that.

[Christmas Ape]

I'm torn on the matter of the Bhatia body. On the one hand, loyalty to the military Hierarchy; on the other, turian culture greatly emphasizes respect for the dead (see Cerberus News Network - the in-game one, not the forum). I don't think we have the cultural details to give Garrus' opinion a grounding point to grow from into -his- opinion.

[danitiwa]

I like that drawing of Garrus purring. XD

ZAEED MISSION, I couldn't resist the scenery+Garrus combo. It's so nice to look at.

[Nilfalasiel]

Christmas Ape wrote...

I'm torn on the matter of the Bhatia body. On the one hand, loyalty to the military Hierarchy; on the other, turian culture greatly emphasizes respect for the dead (see Cerberus News Network - the in-game one, not the forum). I don't think we have the cultural details to give Garrus' opinion a grounding point to grow from into -his- opinion.

Dunno, Garrus does have a practical outlook on technology and progress. He does advise against destroying the Collector Base, remember? Even in spite of all the people who died there. He would definitely see the case for using Nirali's body to save lives in the future. But his experience with losing his whole team might make him reconsider the case in retrospect, because he could see the emotional impact of that one death firsthand. That woman mattered to her husband. Just like his team mattered to him. It's a question of scale, in this case, I think.

Modifié par Nilfalasiel, 04 juin 2010 - 04:05 .

[Christmas Ape]

He does advise against destroying the Collector Base, remember?

Actually, only one playthrough of mine has gone all the way to the end, and...well...I don't want to talk about why I hadn't heard that.

Even in spite of all the people who died there. He would definitely see the case for using Nirali's body to save lives in the future.

And the turian military carpet bombs cities but forbids photography of the dead. It seems to be a respect particularly centered around corpses, rather than deaths. I just don't think we know enough about what was taught to a (in my head utterly adorable) child Garrus yet.

[Pacifien]

Collider wrote...
What do you think Garrus would advocate in the following scenarios?

1. Toombs
2. Samesh Bhatia
3. Consort (Would Garrus even think helping her would be worthwhile? Etc)
4. Chorban/Jahleed
5. Rita's sister
6. Doctor Michel
7. I Remember Me (Colonist)
8. Jacob's father

For Toombs, it depends on if the meeting was before or after Dr. Saleon. If it was before, Garrus would have let Toombs take the shot. If it was after, and Shepard took the paragon route, he'd try to convince Toombs that bringing in the doctor for trial would be better. However, if it was apparent that Toombs was going to have none of it, Garrus would then let him take the shot. Because Garrus might have learned some patience from Shepard's handling of Dr. Saleon, but he doesn't go completely paragon after it.

For Samesh Bhatia, he would let the Alliance keep the body. The geth were a very real threat and there is very little known about them, the Alliance needs the research. I'm not sure he'd be able to do what my Shepard was able to do, which is explain to Bhatia that his wife was a soldier and, as such, would continue to serve the Alliance even in death so that her sacrifice could save more lives. So yeah, I'm not sure if Garrus would have been crafty enough to explain that.

I doubt Garrus would have much cared for the Consort's problems.

If he spoke with Chorban first... Chorban would have likely never told a C-Sec officer what he was doing anyway. So likely he starts with Jaleed, proceeds to confront Chorban, gets annoyed with Chorban's talk about the data, then kills Chorban's guards and proceeds to interrogate Chorban to figure out what the hell is going on. Then likely Chorban and Jaleed both end up in jail.

For Rita's sister, he likely wouldn't get involved. He knows it's a C-Sec operation and leaves it to whoever has jurisdiction over the case.

For Doctor Michel, he likely has come to view her as a good acquaintance after their first meeting. He'd probably intercede on her behalf. It likely would have ended in gunfire because, again, I don't see Garrus having quite the same persuasive ability as Shepard to talk through a situation.

For Talitha, the former slave, I'm not sure what Garrus could have done. She's human and incredibly distrustful of everyone around her at the moment. She never would have let a turian get as close to her as she did Shepard, so Garrus would have probably told the others to handle it. Get a tranquilizer dart and hope she falls forwards instead of backwards.

For Jacob's father... hmm. Probably leave him for the exiles to finish off. View Jacob's father as not worth the air he's breathing and not worthy the mercy of a quick death.

[Pacifien]

Nilfalasiel wrote...
Dunno, Garrus does have a practical outlook on technology and progress. He does advise against destroying the Collector Base, remember?*snip*

No he doesn't. He actually tells Shepard if he destroys the base, then all the people who died there have died for nothing.

Later on the ship, he seems to have reservations that Cerberus got the base, though. But if it had gone to the Council, he probably would have been fine with it.

Modifié par Pacifien, 04 juin 2010 - 04:36 .

[Nilfalasiel]

Pacifien wrote...

Nilfalasiel wrote...
Dunno, Garrus does have a practical outlook on technology and progress. He does advise against destroying the Collector Base, remember?*snip*

No he doesn't. He actually tells Shepard if he destroys the base, then all the people who died there have died for nothing.

Later on the ship, he seems to have reservations that Cerberus got the base, though. But if it had gone to the Council, he probably would have been fine with it.

What I mean is that he sees the usefulness of the base. What he implies from the fact that people have died for nothing is that at least, we should use the technology their sacrifices have created, not throw it away. This is a more practical view than "omg, everything here is tainted, let's blow it all up".

[Pacifien]

I have no idea why I read your original comment wrong, but I did. I thought you were saying he advised to destroy the base, not against destroying the base.

[Nilfalasiel]

Pacifien wrote...

I have no idea why I read your original comment wrong, but I did. I thought you were saying he advised to destroy the base, not against destroying the base.

Lol, fair enough. Then we agree ^^