Aller au contenu

Photo

Thane and Morinth: Both are mass murderers


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
272 réponses à ce sujet

#251
flem1

flem1
  • Members
  • 1 300 messages

Lmaoboat wrote...

Collider wrote...

Lmaoboat wrote...
I didn't see Shep giving any of those Mercs a fair trail. He just assumed they were bad guys and killed them. Which is exactly what Thane does.

???
Them shooting at you is not an indication that Shepard should defend himself?

At the end of the day, everyone's killing bad guys. Thane just does it in a more sneaky way.

Thane never gives you the "they were all bad guys" defense.  He leaps immediately to the "hey, it was just my trigger finger!" baloney.

It's true that his status as a Hanar agent early on may make him different from a mob hitman, but he never really gets into this.

#252
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

BHRamsay wrote...

InvaderErl wrote...

No Morinth is the attractive one here so we HAVE to make excuses for her!


...And some frankly disturbing fanfiction. I can post links to some of the more ....interesting ones.


Please do! Should make for fascinating reading. 

:mellow::blush::o:unsure::crying::happy::D

#253
kaimanaMM

kaimanaMM
  • Members
  • 929 messages

Cutlass Jack wrote...

I'm too lazy to scan the last 10 pages. Did we get into how Mordin ended more lives than everyone else combined with the Genophage yet? (before they began, but still...)


Not yet, but I did post a kitten picture and CrookedAsylum and Remaix were having a Harbinger battle amped up by delicious cider and ended by Felene's well timed falcon punch.

So, I suppose that leaves us ... somewhere in Topeka, Kansas.

Ahyup.

#254
cooldevo

cooldevo
  • Members
  • 200 messages

Collider wrote...
Terrible comparison.
It's not the same. Play as 100% Paragon and there is a clear difference between assassin and Shepard. A spectre is not hired to kill anyone in particular, they are hired to uphold the law (but allowed to break it if necessary). Terrible comparison.


It's in a way the same thing.  How did Saren, and Nihlus do their job?  By killing the bad people that made the world unsafe for the regular innocent people.  Essentially it's Government sponsored assassination, which is still assassination.  They just weren't told specific targets, they were given their choice of how and what to do.

Breaking the law in order to uphold the law just makes it worse for a true paragon.  How can someone break the law in order to uphold it, and still be taken seriously?  Other than the fact you have the council on your side why do you think a number of people in ME1 showed uneasiness and uncertainty around Spectres?  A lot of people express discomfort with them around.

How does that really make you any better than a hired-merc or hired-assassin?  If you need to hold the paragon image high, you have to set the standard of what is good, right, and just.  That does not mean lowering yourself down to the criminals level to put them away.

#255
Aynslie

Aynslie
  • Members
  • 435 messages
I would say if we are going to say Thane and Mornith are mass murderers then we need to include the rest of the crew in here. Thane is an assassin, yes. Mornith is a serial killer, yes. Jack is a psycho path who has admitted to killing people. Garrus is a vigilante who has killed many people, mainly because he was angry. Samara has killed ALOT of people because of her code. If she were to get detained for more than a day she was going to have to kill the police officer. And Miranda and Jacob are Cerberus employees and pretty high ranking at that pretty sure Miranda has done more than just kill people. And poor Grunt just hasn't had enough time to become a "mass murderer" yet. Mordin worked on a stronger or revamped version of th Genophage so the Krogan won't reproduce, that's just wrong in its self not to mention all he has killed. I think Tali is the only actual "good" person on your team. The only people she kills on her own time would be Geth. Of course left to her she would commit genocide on the Geth, now that would be mass murder.

#256
cipher_Cero

cipher_Cero
  • Members
  • 158 messages
To judge Thane on his history is a bit unfair, seeing as none of us know what kind of people he's been hired to kill or what jobs he takes on. It's not a reason to see him a shining beacon of righteousness, but we have far less information on who he's killed.

Because of that, his motives are what need to be called into question, which is difficult when he holds an entirely different set of morals than you do.



Morinth, on the other hand, finds ecstasy in killing. It's pleasure, it's fun, and she gets off on it. There's nothing to complicate the situation. It's thrilling for her to kill someone else, whether they're "innocent" or not.



Moral relativism. If you believe in moral relativism you really have no room to judge either of these characters for what they do, because they don't share your beliefs or standards.





Also, it's a game.

#257
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

cooldevo wrote...
It's in a way the same thing.  How did Saren, and Nihlus do their job?  By killing the bad people that made the world unsafe for the regular innocent people.  Essentially it's Government sponsored assassination, which is still assassination.  They just weren't told specific targets, they were given their choice of how and what to do.

Um, it's not government sponsored assassination if they don't give the Spectres specific targets. You may as well say that the police departments sponsor assassination because the police officers sometimes kill in self defense or defense of others. Would love to hear you tell a police officer that he's an assassin. 

Breaking the law in order to uphold the law just makes it worse for a true paragon.  How can someone break the law in order to uphold it, and still be taken seriously?

It's fairly simple. Take Noveria for example. You're tracking down Benezia, who is working with Saren. You are technically not allowed to carry weapons with you, but due to being a Spectre, an exception can be made. It doesn't mean you HAVE to use those weapons.

How does that really make you any better than a hired-merc or hired-assassin?  If you need to hold the paragon image high, you have to set the standard of what is good, right, and just.  That does not mean lowering yourself down to the criminals level to put them away.

Being a Spectre by itself does not lend itself to being moral or immoral. No one needs to be killed, a Spectre can strive to only arrest subjects for trial and at worst kill in self-defense. An assassin NEEDS to kill people, and it is not in immediate self-defense due to the fact that it is premeditated. Thane did not give Nassana the chance to stand down and turn herself in, instead he just came in through the vents and immediately started killing people.

#258
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

cipher_Cero wrote...
Moral relativism. If you believe in moral relativism you really have no room to judge either of these characters for what they do, because they don't share your beliefs or standards.

I do believe that morals are subjective, but that in no way means that I cannot or should not judge the morals and actions of other people.

Modifié par Collider, 20 février 2010 - 09:40 .


#259
Skavau

Skavau
  • Members
  • 63 messages

Moral relativism. If you believe in moral relativism you really have no room to judge either of these characters for what they do, because they don't share your beliefs or standards.


If that were true, then 'beliefs' and 'standards' would be terms without meaning. You can judge people's actions whether your perspective is objective (an incoherent claim in itself) or subjective.



Irrespectively, Morinth has taken herself outside of the realm of morality whether you consider it objective or not. She has no consideration for the interests or well-being of other beings. It does not concern her, and nor does she care that her actions kill others. She does it regardless. When you lose that consideration for other people, you step outside of the foundation of all morality.

#260
cipher_Cero

cipher_Cero
  • Members
  • 158 messages

Skavau wrote...

Moral relativism. If you believe in moral relativism you really have no room to judge either of these characters for what they do, because they don't share your beliefs or standards.

If that were true, then 'beliefs' and 'standards' would be terms without meaning. You can judge people's actions whether your perspective is objective (an incoherent claim in itself) or subjective.

Irrespectively, Morinth has taken herself outside of the realm of morality whether you consider it objective or not. She has no consideration for the interests or well-being of other beings. It does not concern her, and nor does she care that her actions kill others. She does it regardless. When you lose that consideration for other people, you step outside of the foundation of all morality.


What I'm saying is that Thane and Morinth are on two completely different planes. We know nothing of his past or what kind of people he killed, whether or not he did so indiscriminately where he killed both the innocent and the guilty. Nothing of his clients or his targets.
We just know that he's an assassin. We also can see that he's a loving, caring father; a civilized and sophisticated individual; and a genuinely repentant and remorseful person who wants to brighten the world before he dies. The very thought of his son being anything like him is a source of distress, so much he stops his own son in the middle of a hit. The target wasn't even innocent--Thane even lets him get out alive in favor of facing the system rather than take the kill himself.

Is it really fair--or even sensible--to lump him in with Morinth at this point who, like you said, has no consideration for the people she kills? You can say that she didn't choose to bear her disease, but can you hide behind that when she glamorizes it and willingly uses it against other people to satisfy only herself? I mean, she even tries to kill you.

I'm not defending either. I'm not incredibly relativistic when it comes to beliefs, or standards, or morals. I'm saying that there is definitely a reason why Thane would be seen as being less morally and socially bankrupt than Morinth. I just don't see why anybody would lump them together like that. Everyone on your team is, on some level, a killer. If we're doing comparisons we'll have to look past that and see into motivations and character. With Thane and Morinth, one of them is clearly a little off.

I, for one, would be quicker to trust Thane. I'd be a little more comfortable having him around than even entertaining the notion of Morinth being in the same city.

#261
Prophet of Rage

Prophet of Rage
  • Members
  • 136 messages
Thane is forgiven because he's SMOOTH AS EGGS.

#262
DemonGunslinger

DemonGunslinger
  • Members
  • 12 messages
Wow...just like a human to judge others of a different culture and in this case, a different species.

There's a number of pages here and I've gone through a lot of em but not all. People keep throwing out words and no one seems to understand the word they're using. But here's a clue people.

A mass murderer, boys and girls, is not just someone who has murdered many people. They are a person/group/organization that has killed 4 or more people in a SINGLE event, say like a train bombing. Don't believe me? Well, there's always the dictionary or even wikipedia.

A seriel killer is a "person who murders three or more people over a period of more than thirty days, with a "cooling off" period between each murder, and whose motivation for killing is largely based on psychological gratification," more of which can be found on wikipedia.

Learn what the heck you're saying before you open your mouths. Thane doesn't fall under either of those categories based on what we know. He's admitted to trying to keep the death count to a minimum but unless he ups and says "I killed a bunch of people with a bomb" he is no mass murderer. Morinth falls more under a serial killer than she does a mass murderer. True, she did her voodoo stuff on the village but unless she killed a bunch of people within a short period of time, she is by no means a mass murderer.

Modifié par DemonGunslinger, 21 février 2010 - 07:06 .


#263
Dr. Peter Venkman

Dr. Peter Venkman
  • Members
  • 802 messages

Sleepicub09 wrote...

Dr. Peter Venkman wrote...

Kyria Nyriese wrote...

So is Shepard. The difference is that Shepard and Thane don't kill innocents nor to they kill for just pleasure. Where as Morinth kills people for the heck off it and because she likes the thrill. One is a necessary evil, the other is a monster.


Thane kills people for money. Almost as bad as killing people for the heck of it.

actually he's a freelancer


Even worse!

#264
Jaarlitar

Jaarlitar
  • Members
  • 50 messages
Thane and Morinth do present a problem if you look only at their actions. Both have killed many people, yes. I'd assume both have even killed 'innocent' people. But if you look at 'innocent' a bit better, there's a difference in them. No one hires an assassin to kill a shopkeeper or a normal citizen. Assassination targets are almost always either criminals or people of political interest. The first group is far from innocent, but some innocent people may be found in the second.

People of political interest include cult leaders, extremists, liars and all that jazz but also those who honestly just wanted to make the world a better place. It's not clear but I assume Thane has killed his share of those ones too.

Hiring an assassin as skilled as Thane must be costly (at least when he was a freelancer). I doubt he'd take a job for 20 credits or something. So yes, the person who hires an assassin is a rich one, and the target someone whose death is worth all of those credits to the one who ordered the hit.

The only people Thane himself decided to kill were the ones who killed his wife. The others must have been 'big players' in some areas. The question of their innocence or guilt remain unanswered.

When it comes to Morinth...every time she kills she decides to do so herself. Who the target is doesn't matter, their innocence or guilt doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is that they must be 'powerful' people. In this I don't mean having a great army, but power of spirit, of personality. She hunts artistic people, sculptors, mucisian, painters...guess anything goes. And if I remember correctly, she gains in strength after each kill.

It is a difficult comparison, yes, but we have two totally different people with totally different reasons to kill. I'm not saying Thane is a saint or Morinth is a beast.

The difference is that in Thane there are redeeming gualities to be found, in Morinth none.

When the childhood question arises...Thane had little choice in his since he entered the assassin training at the age of 6. Morinth's genetic disorder (I know it's not her fault) 'appeared' when she reached adulthood so I assume she had a normal childhood as far as asari childhoods go.

It's true also that it's easier for Thane to stop killing. He could just lay down his weapons and go die in peace somewhere (probably Kahje). Yet he decided not to, and instead started hunting dangerous people. If he felt no guilt over his kills, he could've just retired and lived the rest of his days happily somewhere. Now, it doesn't matter that much what originated his guilt over his kills. I believe most nearing their deaths regret the things they did or didn't do while they still had time. But not everyone and usually the ones who don't are the ones who've done most wrongs.

Morinth probably isn't able to stop killing, she's addicted to it. I'm also pretty sure that she wouldn't stop even if she had another option than death. She's a predator and kills for the thrill - the target's life isn't worth anything more than just another boost to herself. She had a choice. It wasn't a good one but she had it. And at that time she wasn't even addicted to killing like she is now.

#265
flem1

flem1
  • Members
  • 1 300 messages

Jaarlitar wrote...

Assassination targets are almost always either criminals or people of political interest.

Or whistleblowers, witnesses to crime, etc...

#266
Skavau

Skavau
  • Members
  • 63 messages

cipher_Cero wrote...

Skavau wrote...

Moral relativism. If you believe in moral relativism you really have no room to judge either of these characters for what they do, because they don't share your beliefs or standards.

If that were true, then 'beliefs' and 'standards' would be terms without meaning. You can judge people's actions whether your perspective is objective (an incoherent claim in itself) or subjective.

Irrespectively, Morinth has taken herself outside of the realm of morality whether you consider it objective or not. She has no consideration for the interests or well-being of other beings. It does not concern her, and nor does she care that her actions kill others. She does it regardless. When you lose that consideration for other people, you step outside of the foundation of all morality.


What I'm saying is that Thane and Morinth are on two completely different planes. We know nothing of his past or what kind of people he killed, whether or not he did so indiscriminately where he killed both the innocent and the guilty. Nothing of his clients or his targets.
We just know that he's an assassin. We also can see that he's a loving, caring father; a civilized and sophisticated individual; and a genuinely repentant and remorseful person who wants to brighten the world before he dies. The very thought of his son being anything like him is a source of distress, so much he stops his own son in the middle of a hit. The target wasn't even innocent--Thane even lets him get out alive in favor of facing the system rather than take the kill himself.

Is it really fair--or even sensible--to lump him in with Morinth at this point who, like you said, has no consideration for the people she kills? You can say that she didn't choose to bear her disease, but can you hide behind that when she glamorizes it and willingly uses it against other people to satisfy only herself? I mean, she even tries to kill you.

I'm not defending either. I'm not incredibly relativistic when it comes to beliefs, or standards, or morals. I'm saying that there is definitely a reason why Thane would be seen as being less morally and socially bankrupt than Morinth. I just don't see why anybody would lump them together like that. Everyone on your team is, on some level, a killer. If we're doing comparisons we'll have to look past that and see into motivations and character. With Thane and Morinth, one of them is clearly a little off.

I, for one, would be quicker to trust Thane. I'd be a little more comfortable having him around than even entertaining the notion of Morinth being in the same city.

I agree with you. Morinth is a monster. I was responding almost entirely to your morals being relativistic response.

#267
MutantSpleen

MutantSpleen
  • Members
  • 591 messages
How come Jack wasn't included in this bunch? She is an out and out killer who gets off on killing. How is she any different than Morinth, in fact she is probably worse. Morinth is more like a spider who traps flys in her web. I believe Jack is a mass murderer too, she mentions something about blowing up a space station or something.

#268
DuffyMJ

DuffyMJ
  • Members
  • 944 messages

tonnactus wrote...

Kyria Nyriese wrote...

 The difference is that Shepard and Thane don't kill innocents

Do you really think thane never killed innocents?Again,look at the example of his son.He starts his career with a try to kill a innocent turian politican.
If thane only kill bad guys where wouldnt be a reason to regret his past actions (prayer for the BAD).Why,if he made the world better.
The thought alone that assasins only kill bad people is really amusing.


Uh, what? How was he innocent?  He was shaking down businessmen and had hired goons from the Bloodpack.  Were you even paying attention to the quest?

#269
MutantSpleen

MutantSpleen
  • Members
  • 591 messages
Its naive to think Thane never killed innocents. He states that in his past he has brought a lot of darkness into the world, now he is trying to atone. The prayers he says are for the wicked, we come to find out the wicked one is himself.

#270
Skavau

Skavau
  • Members
  • 63 messages

MutantSpleen wrote...

How come Jack wasn't included in this bunch? She is an out and out killer who gets off on killing. How is she any different than Morinth, in fact she is probably worse. Morinth is more like a spider who traps flys in her web. I believe Jack is a mass murderer too, she mentions something about blowing up a space station or something.

Because this thread is comparing Thane to Morinth...

#271
Skavau

Skavau
  • Members
  • 63 messages

MutantSpleen wrote...

Its naive to think Thane never killed innocents. He states that in his past he has brought a lot of darkness into the world, now he is trying to atone. The prayers he says are for the wicked, we come to find out the wicked one is himself.

Possibly. We don't know.

He is certainly repentant now. Which is much more than Morinth.

#272
cooldevo

cooldevo
  • Members
  • 200 messages

Collider wrote...

cooldevo wrote...
It's in a way the same thing.  How did Saren, and Nihlus do their job?  By killing the bad people that made the world unsafe for the regular innocent people.  Essentially it's Government sponsored assassination, which is still assassination.  They just weren't told specific targets, they were given their choice of how and what to do.


Um, it's not government sponsored assassination if they don't give the Spectres specific targets. You may as well say that the police departments sponsor assassination because the police officers sometimes kill in self defense or defense of others. Would love to hear you tell a police officer that he's an assassin.


Spectres are given a blank check to do what they feel they need to do on behalf of the council.  As stated from ME1, to do the jobs that need to be done, when the council cannot be directly involved.  That leave no accountability or oversight.  Saren directly killed thousands of people in ME1, and was backed by the council until they had no option.  So yes, they didn't name the targets, but they approved of his work, while maintaining as little oversight as possible.  That makes them just as complicit as Saren.  If they had not, would most of ME1 even happened?


Breaking the law in order to uphold the law just makes it worse for a true paragon.  How can someone break the law in order to uphold it, and still be taken seriously?

It's fairly simple. Take Noveria for example. You're tracking down Benezia, who is working with Saren. You are technically not allowed to carry weapons with you, but due to being a Spectre, an exception can be made. It doesn't mean you HAVE to use those weapons.


The spectre title allows for some exceptions to be made, yes.  But those are at the directive of the Council.  If they didn't enforce compliance would the Noverians have really listened?  They only did what they did because they were required to do so.  And sure, if they didn't you could just blow them away and walk right in, but that defeats the whole who is less evil part of the discussion.


How does that really make you any better than a hired-merc or hired-assassin?  If you need to hold the paragon image high, you have to set the standard of what is good, right, and just.  That does not mean lowering yourself down to the criminals level to put them away.

Being a Spectre by itself does not lend itself to being moral or immoral. No one needs to be killed, a Spectre can strive to only arrest subjects for trial and at worst kill in self-defense. An assassin NEEDS to kill people, and it is not in immediate self-defense due to the fact that it is premeditated. Thane did not give Nassana the chance to stand down and turn herself in, instead he just came in through the vents and immediately started killing people.


And exactly that.  What chance does Morinth give anyone either?  Does she warn them what will happen before she does what she does?  No she does not and that really doesn't put her on any better foot than Thane.  Which is what this whole discussion is about.  Thane at least expresses regret for what he does and has done.  Morinth does not, rather she relishes and gets off on the "power" she gets from it.  And shows no sign or interest in stopping.  That's very evident if you talk to her about the objects in her apartment.

Of which, even if you get into the whole "turning herself in" would she really?  If she was that worried about being assassinated by one of her sisters, why does she not do that?  Easy, because she never wanted to nor was planning on it.  She had plenty of time while she was killing innocent construction workers for no reason other than they didn't clear out of the building fast enough.  She just got a taste her own medicine.

Modifié par cooldevo, 22 février 2010 - 07:53 .


#273
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages
If I understood correctly, at first Thane was just an assassin, who took any job. Seeing himself only as a tool, nothing more. It was not until he met his to-be-wife. She "woke him up" as Thane said. After that he only killed bad people, people who clearly deserve it like Nassana Dantius. He also feels regret for what he has done. He realises that he has walked a dark path and wants to spare that from his son. While he still lingers on the "i'm just a tool" explanation, he is still honest about his past and I trust him to be in my crew.

Morinth is a monster, enjoys the hunt, plays with her victims feelings and then kills to get high and turned on, plus she gets more powerfull with each kill. She is driven by her lust like an animal and not for one second should be trusted.

Difference? One is not a lost cause and there is hope for him for redemption. Other is just an abomination.

Modifié par MaaZeus, 22 février 2010 - 08:35 .