43 réponses à ce sujet

[Seagloom]

Yes people have sex on a regular basis. That's never been in my top 3 of relationship priorities though. More importantly, I refuse to participate in your ending. I'm not Padme, dammit. The implication makes me retch.

Modifié par Seagloom, 20 février 2010 - 01:58 .

[AntiChri5]

Seagloom wrote...

Yes people have sex on a regular basis. That's never been in my top 3 of relationship priorities though. More importantly, I refuse to participate in your ending. I'm not Padme, dammit.

I really hope not! Lets not forget what happened to her!

[Godak]

Seagloom wrote...

Yes people have sex on a regular basis. That's never been in my top 3 of relationship priorities though.

Yay for high standards!
 

Seagloom wrote...

More importantly, I refuse to participate in your ending.

*Puts his fingers in his ears*

Lalalalalalalalalalala....
 

Seagloom wrote...

I'm not Padme, dammit. The implication makes me retch.

...Triplets? Quadruplets?

Honestly, I think my ending works better. Yours just seems like pointless tragedy. It'll leave the player with a funky taste in their mouth. At least my ending leaves the player with the taste of fresh, salty tears.
Also, they get to have sex with you.

Modifié par Godak, 20 février 2010 - 05:00 .

[AntiChri5]

I think someone may need to hold Godak down...

[Godak]

AntiChri5 wrote...

I think someone may need to hold Godak down...

*Almost makes a comment about how it's "Fine with me, as long as it's Seagloom!"*

*Decides that he values life far too much.*

[AntiChri5]

well Seagloom, you definatly have a fan.

[Godak]

AntiChri5 wrote...

well Seagloom, you definatly have a fan.

I'm actually more of an annoying younger brother.

[Seagloom]

Oy vey. >.<

[Godak]

Seagloom wrote...

>.<

There's a smiley for that!



*Ahem*

So, on a scale of 1-10...How off-topic is this topic?

[AntiChri5]

It could not be more off topic

[Seagloom]

There is but it requires the standard form. I'd have to click twice for that. Twice! Simply unacceptable unless I'm editing a post.



Very off topic for this thread, which is why we should probably stop.

[AntiChri5]

Seagloom wrote...

There is but it requires the standard form. I'd have to click twice for that. Twice! Simply unacceptable unless I'm editing a post.

Very off topic for this thread, which is why we should probably stop.

Exactly the same here.

Going to far off topic on an off topic topic?

[ThessalyCousaland]

Man, I was surprised to get 36 comment notifications in the email about this topic...



Now I'm just disappointed.

[Seagloom]

My apologies for the part I played.



Although I must admit surprise that anyone turns on comment notifications. These forums move so fast they flooded my inbox when I had them on.



Still though, I apologize.

[Godak]

Godak wrote...

...And so does blatant exaggeration. The author was clearly trying to fit certain characters into certain molds that they do not necessarily fit. Still, we've played the games, and we understand what he means, so the bits and pieces that were blown out of proportion only give the article even more humor.

My last comment that was at all relevant to the topic.

...Sorry...

[Mordaedil]

... Creepy topic.

[Dark Lilith]

AntiChri5 wrote...

I think someone may need to hold Godak down...

I'b be more than happy to bind and ball gag him!

[KneeTheCap]

Can I watch? I wanna watch!

[Ocelot83]

If I'll just stay on the topic.
Characters, that I think come closest to these archetypes in Mass Effect
games:
1.Kaidan
2.Liara
3.TIM
4.Miranda
5.Grunt
6.Turian councilor
7.Legion

HK-47 was awesome, they should make it as a DLC character for ME 2.