What's so bad about keeping the Collector base?
#1
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:31
#2
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:32
That's bad.
#3
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:34
Unfortunately, the option we get is to save the base AND hand it to Cerberus.
Terrorists with ubertech = bad.
#4
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:34
The Angry One wrote...
Keeping it wouldn't be so bad if the only choice wasn't handing it to Cerberus.
That's bad.
Why is that necessarily the case? It seems really forced. I'm not asking you to answer the question, obviously, you didn't develop the game, it just makes me grit my teeth in frustration.
#5
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:36
Terraneaux wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Keeping it wouldn't be so bad if the only choice wasn't handing it to Cerberus.
That's bad.
Why is that necessarily the case? It seems really forced. I'm not asking you to answer the question, obviously, you didn't develop the game, it just makes me grit my teeth in frustration.
BioWare enjoy false dilemmas - there's a similar one in Dragon Age, where an important piece of technology is at stake and you're given black and white options, neither of which are particularily satisfying.
Modifié par The Angry One, 20 février 2010 - 08:36 .
#6
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:36
#7
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:37
#8
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:38
#9
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:39
Epilogue shows the Normandy SR-2 in proper Alliance colours!
Modifié par The Angry One, 20 février 2010 - 08:39 .
#10
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:39
#11
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:41
The Angry One wrote...
Yeah there should be an option to preserve the station then when TIM is all happy, you call in the Alliance 5th Fleet that plows through the Cerberus ships and takes over.
Epilogue shows the Normandy SR-2 in proper Alliance colours!
That would be pretty sweet.
#12
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:44
#13
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:48
#14
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:48
#15
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:54
- Massive population sacrifice if you want to build a Reaper
- Cybernetic implantation that replaces organic functions.
- Indoctrination, which is basically slavery
- Bioweapons, which are strictly forbidden on the Citadel
You're looking at a total defiance of whatever the Council and galactic law aspires to, in order to get the job done.
Even if you used this to defeat the Reapers it's not like TIM or someone wanting to push their agenda is just going to pass up that kind of power.
#16
Posté 20 février 2010 - 08:55
#17
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:02
#18
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:08

''Retribution is set in the universe fans know well from the video game and novel series—one in which humanity has explored the very farthest reaches of the universe, only to discover the ruthless Reapers, a race bent on extinguishing all organic life. One man is bent on discovering the Reapers' secrets, the mysterious Illusive Man, the leader of a pro-human, black ops group, Cerberus. And he's devised the perfect plan: implant a human subject with Reaper technology in order to study the enemy.
He also has the perfect test subject—Paul Grayson, an ex-Cerberus operative. Grayson betrayed Cerberus in order to save his daughter. So when Grayson is kidnapped and made the subject of Cerberus' evil experiments, the Illusive Man will finally have his revenge...''
#19
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:09
The Capital Gaultier wrote...
Cerberus is a pro-human organization. It's not a bad choice (way overblown on here), it's just a very human-centrist choice.
Don't confuse Kelly's perception of Cerberus for what it really is. The crew of the Normandy are good people, but as Engineer Donnelly points out he doesn't know much about them.
And if your Shepard is a Sole Survivor of Akuze, Cerberus is responsible for the death of your entire unit. It would make absolutely no sense for Shepard to trust them with a weapon like this.
Modifié par anmiro, 20 février 2010 - 09:10 .
#20
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:12
anmiro wrote...
The Capital Gaultier wrote...
Cerberus is a pro-human organization. It's not a bad choice (way overblown on here), it's just a very human-centrist choice.
Don't confuse Kelly's perception of Cerberus for what it really is. The crew of the Normandy are good people, but as Engineer Donnelly points out he doesn't know much about them.
And if your Shepard is a Sole Survivor of Akuze, Cerberus is responsible for the death of your entire unit. It would make absolutely no sense for Shepard to trust them with a weapon like this.
Let's not forget poor Rear Admiral Kohaku!
#21
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:13
Why not? TIM is not idealistic, and he makes no bones about it. However, he is the most level-headed, rational person in the ME universe so far. You can predict exactly what he's going to do with it to some degree of certainty.anmiro wrote...
The Capital Gaultier wrote...
Cerberus is a pro-human organization. It's not a bad choice (way overblown on here), it's just a very human-centrist choice.
Don't confuse Kelly's perception of Cerberus for what it really is. The crew of the Normandy are good people, but as Engineer Donnelly points out he doesn't know much about them.
And if your Shepard is a Sole Survivor of Akuze, Cerberus is responsible for the death of your entire unit. It would make absolutely no sense for Shepard to trust them with a weapon like this.
#22
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:14
#23
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:15
BUT, the war with the reapers is alao a means to an end, the end being humanity controlling the universe. That's what TIM really wants.
So, in essence, Shepard is playing a huge chessgame. He moves some pieces along, but doesn't let them cross the entire board. You help Cerberus beat the Collectors and buy time, but you prevent them from achieving ultimate power.
#24
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:15
The Capital Gaultier wrote...
Why not? TIM is not idealistic, and he makes no bones about it. However, he is the most level-headed, rational person in the ME universe so far. You can predict exactly what he's going to do with it to some degree of certainty.anmiro wrote...
The Capital Gaultier wrote...
Cerberus is a pro-human organization. It's not a bad choice (way overblown on here), it's just a very human-centrist choice.
Don't confuse Kelly's perception of Cerberus for what it really is. The crew of the Normandy are good people, but as Engineer Donnelly points out he doesn't know much about them.
And if your Shepard is a Sole Survivor of Akuze, Cerberus is responsible for the death of your entire unit. It would make absolutely no sense for Shepard to trust them with a weapon like this.
I disagree. TIM is idealistic. Believeing that he can master the dangerous Reaper technology is very idealistic.
#25
Posté 20 février 2010 - 09:17
TIM never says that this technology will put humanity on top and ensure that humanity can stop the Reapers. Instead, he specifically says that the technology has the potential to do those things. If you want to deny him the chance, don't do it on the basis of him being illogical.Internet Kraken wrote...
The Capital Gaultier wrote...
Why not? TIM is not idealistic, and he makes no bones about it. However, he is the most level-headed, rational person in the ME universe so far. You can predict exactly what he's going to do with it to some degree of certainty.anmiro wrote...
The Capital Gaultier wrote...
Cerberus is a pro-human organization. It's not a bad choice (way overblown on here), it's just a very human-centrist choice.
Don't confuse Kelly's perception of Cerberus for what it really is. The crew of the Normandy are good people, but as Engineer Donnelly points out he doesn't know much about them.
And if your Shepard is a Sole Survivor of Akuze, Cerberus is responsible for the death of your entire unit. It would make absolutely no sense for Shepard to trust them with a weapon like this.
I disagree. TIM is idealistic. Believeing that he can master the dangerous Reaper technology is very idealistic.
Modifié par The Capital Gaultier, 20 février 2010 - 09:17 .





Retour en haut







