Aller au contenu

Photo

Which Type of Warrior?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
5 réponses à ce sujet

#1
AXidenT Gamer

AXidenT Gamer
  • Members
  • 251 messages
Any suggestions from veterans?

Elf or Warrior?

Two Hand, Shield or Duel Wield?

Thanks for any suggestions or tips. ^_^

#2
Incognito JC

Incognito JC
  • Members
  • 693 messages
Elf is horrible as a warrior. If you want an elf melee character, try rogue - assassin type. 2 hands do higher damage than dual wield, but dual wield lets you equip 2 different weapons, with different effects. That also means more rune slots. Shield does less damage than the other two types, but you can tank pretty well with it.



Dwarves make great warriors, but I prefer humans for aesthetic reasons.

#3
AXidenT Gamer

AXidenT Gamer
  • Members
  • 251 messages
Hmm, I'll probably go human warrior then.



Does the game seem to prefer you playing a certain way?

#4
Haasth

Haasth
  • Members
  • 4 412 messages
It probably all comes down to personal preference. But I'd say technically Dwarves make the best warriors (Due to racial benefits). My own preference goes to a Shield + Sword human though... Got to get one of those further than the origin sometimes, get me a Templar... Love that armor. But Mages first!

EDIT:
And as far as I can tell. The game does not prefer you to play a certain way, no. Though some party members might be conflicting (Such as Alister if you go for shields and such) due to their pre-set talents.

Modifié par Haasth, 07 novembre 2009 - 11:06 .


#5
Sturmlied

Sturmlied
  • Members
  • 32 messages
I'm playing a City Elf Warrior with Dual wield it's quit fun and a good (safe!) AoE character.



I usually go with Alisdair (Sword and Shield) and then I mix up the group a lot but usually Wynn is there as a healer.

#6
Jide Aurelius

Jide Aurelius
  • Members
  • 154 messages
I personally play a Human, Shield-Warrior Champion. Its pretty fun, but I find that having the 3 modes is kinda dumb, they should have made a master mode imo.