Ultenth wrote...
It is however interesting and a bit amusing to see his many actions that are quite obviously attributed to him and are quite evil as something he wasn't involved in or didn't intend. Maybe just the choices you make can change the playthroughs that drastically, but I'm going to lean towards naivete, wishful thinking, or fanaticism towards him.
Actually, while I like the character, its more desire to point out facts since most of these threads are just people saying "BUT DA CUTSCENES SHOWED HIM AS BAD, HOW HE CAN BE GOOD HURRRRRR BRAIN HURT" over and over again for several pages, and I am nothing if not irritated greatly when people REFUSE to look at a character, and just paint them off because a cutscene told them to believe that is truth, despite evidence on the contrary.
And what exactly did he do thats "obviously" attributed to him?
Couslands - Attributed to Howe, can only be connected to Loghain if Loghain planned to kill Cailan, even then its a hard fit.
Cailan/Duncan/Ostagar - Yes he retreated, but not only did he have good reasons, but as he says if you bring him, he would have done the exact same thing if he was in the same position and his daughter was in Cailans place, because there was nothing he could have done. This, along with the MANY other things he and Wynne talk about lead me to belive it wasn't a deliberate plan to kill Cailan, but rather just an old General refusing to sacrifice what little remained of Fereldens army to save a idiot king that would have died anyway since the mage support had left the field.
Mage Tower - He says he didn't do it, and Wynne agrees it was all Uldred here, not much more I can say.
Eamon - Yeah sure, he poisoned a rival, but it was only to put him into a deep slumber, if it wasn't for Conner messing around with demons, he could have easily had the Arl woken up after he set things up, which is implied to be his plan if you talk to him. It wasn't an act of malice, he just didn't want to drive Ferelden into a civil war when it was already so weak, especially with Orlais next door, as he knew Eamon would hound him constantly, and had enough support to fight back.
Alienage - Yeah, he sold Elves, but he did it to keep the Civil War from blowing up, and to keep enough forces on hand to handle Orlais, the Blight, and the Warden, once again, he did it for Ferelden, rather then because he was a power hungry maniac or anything. You have to realize, yeah its an immoral act, but Elves were still seen as little more then second hand citizens by most of Ferelden, even with all the advances they had made, to Loghain it would be like selling dogs and cats to pay for something, its cruel and mean, but not really evil.
In the end, all he did was poison Eamon, which was just a temporary solution just to keep the country out of Civil War, and sold a few Elves.
And thats enough to kill him?
Yeah, they are not nice things to do, slavery is bad, and so is poison, but he did have good reasons to do both, as he was stuck with his back against a wall for most of the game, and was willing to do anything to keep Ferelden toghether, immoral or not. But last I checked, slavery is not enough to kill a person in front of their only daughter, for no reason other then a party member is pissed and to immature to see any other way.
I mean, look at Sten, he killed an entire family in cold blood, they were unarmed, could not defend themselves, and actually invited him in to their home, and he killed every single one of them, even the children, then sat there and waited for the guard to arrive. Yet people love Sten, and nobody bats an eye to saving him, but because Loghain sold a few Elves to keep Ferelden from falling apart, its cut off his head time? Exscuse me if I wonder if people have gone insane, or don't think very hard about things.
Modifié par Default137, 24 février 2010 - 09:28 .