33 réponses à ce sujet

[Statulos]

DarthCaine wrote...

I also don't buy the official 9/11 story, but then again I'm not American so I don't give a damn

We didn´t and it was great to have the trains in Madrid bombed.

[DragonDefender]

Color me Purple and call me impressed, the majority of people have kept this hotbutton issue pretty civil.

[bzombo]

the conspiracy theories, if not built off of questionable internet sites, might have had some credibility, but they don't have any. the "evidence" presented is laughable at best, and at worst should be enough to get a few people psychologically evaluated. those of you who either weren't there or weren't close by to witness it should leave it well enough alone. these crazy theories are an insult to those who died and to those who endured the events of that day. not everything is a plot by the government to destroy us all. the government has its problems, many of them serious, but a 9/11 cover up is not one of them.

[Godak]

darkshadow136 wrote...

The Roman Empire was the first Democracy, and it is quite ironic that our own country is falling prey to the same downfall that fell the Roman Empire. For those that want to point fingers it's not just one party or one man to blame it is all of them, since in these days for any politician to go up the ladder high enough to make any changes they end up corrupting their own-selves to get there.

1. The Roman Empire was not a democracy. It was either an Oligarchy, or a Dictatorship, depending on the period in history.

2. The USA is usually in the top 15 or 20 countries in evalutartions of countries' corruption (1 being least corrupt).

3. We aren't dealing with costant rebellions/invasions.
 
So...How are we like the Roman Empire, again?

[Borschtbeet]

I really hate how 9/11 has become so politicized. People trying to score political points from that disaster are really the lowest kind of scum.

[Rictras Shard]

Jae Onasi wrote...

SkullandBonesmember wrote...
Just 2 examples of first responders and workers talking about explosions before the planes struck and or explosion damage way below the point of impact of the plane.

 
Right. I'm supposed to believe youtube stuff. There were 2 large planes, fully loaded with fuel, crashing into the buildings. Isn't it possible that this MIGHT have caused some major structural damage that affected the foundation enough for it to make SOME kind of noise? Furthermore, stuff was falling OFF the buildings onto the ground below. Don't you think that made a little bit of noise, too?

I am neither agreeing or disagreeing with SkullandBonesmember's examples. I'd like to point out, though, that if these explosions did indeed happen, it would be difficult for the planes to have caused them when they hadn't even hit the building yet.

I do not know if there was any coverup for what happened on that day. However, it is troubling that the government refused to allow any effective independant investigation.

[SkullandBonesmember]

AntiChri5 wrote...

The idea that George W Shrub could pull this off without a hitch......i dont buy it. Im surprised the man could dress himself.

It's not just him. It's a LOT of people behind the scenes. It's not a coincidence that the Bush family and Royal family are related.

[Chris Priestly]

Sorry, no politics here.


LOCKDOWN!