Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...
Diddnt the Amercans do somthing similar in Vietnam? They were worried that if South Vietnam became communist then every other country would follow and become communist as well. So to prevent that they sent a lot of soldies into the meat grinder and eventually lost the war. But dispite their predictions that all the other countries would follow and become communist the exact opposite happend and comunisum colapsed from within.
Hasty decisions lead to big mistakes.
Last time I checked the, um, Socialist Republic of Vietnam was still a communist state, even if liberalized in recent years. Cambodia managed to go communist itself (though the role of the Vietnam War in that is debated), but then got invaded by Vietnam in 1978 which resulted another communist government that lasted until 1993. Vietnam kept troops there until 1990. So is Laos, also something North Vietnam, and later just plain Vietnam, was involved in. Sure, the "Domino" notion was overstating things, but not entirely and it was also not without grounding in historical precedent: see post-WW2 Eastern Europe, Tibet, North Korea, the Cold War. It's easy to condemn the initial decision to get involved now, but the overall process of escalation was hardly a hasty one: the policy began during the Eisenhower administration. You know, the one from the 1950s? And, just in general, your portrayal of the Vietnam War is absurdly simplistic, but then so is your view of what happened with the geth.
Modifié par didymos1120, 23 février 2010 - 01:41 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut










