Aurailious wrote...
And perhaps the other time a race found us was during the dinosaurs. Their extinction was caused by a battle with the Reapers, this perhaps being the end of the line so to speak. The last place to make a stand. And further speculating would than lead to the thought that this caused the relay to be encased in ice. Perhaps a by product or an event of said battle. Perhaps a countermeasure, a way to try and slow or stop the Reapers from getting to them, block the passage. But as we see, the Reapers are more than capable of traveling without the relays.
This is possible, if you go back far enough you simply lose details no matter how good your analysis might be. The extinction event could have been the reapers harvesting some unknown civilization. However the timeline gets a little funny. We know the reapers are old, but the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. If the reapers existed that long ago, and the relay would have to exist that long ago then the number of potential species in the potential cycles is extremely high, making my argument of why it was never recolonized even stronger.
Who knows though, if the relay was encased in ice then its plausible why earth was never recolonized, but doesn't explain how the protheans found it without the mass relay being active, unless we could slide blind luck in there conveniently.
MrBeardface wrote...
1)
They would have to discover that one particular mass relay. I think
it's fair to assume not every space-faring civilisation would discover
it - I mean, it was relatively recently that the Rachni relay was
discovered, for one.
Sure I could buy that, but we're talking thousands of potential space faring races, who are limited to travelling the mass relays which only likely go so many places.
MrBeardface wrote...
2) They would need to be able to benefit
from Earth's conditions - it's perfectly plausible that for some
species our atmosphere would either be inhospitable or downright toxic.
I could buy this too, but if we use the protheans and the current cycle that's at least 10 species, not including quarians and volus who would find earth quite nice. Synthetic species would also find the extremely hospitable environment easy to mine the planet for resources as well. Its not just a matter of wanting to live there, most of the planets in the "known" galaxy have some sort of structure to exploit the resources of that planet, even if it wasn't a full scale colony earth has plenty of easy to access resources compared to say mining the core of a gas giant.
MrBeardface wrote...
3)
They would have to be in need of another planet to colonize. Easy if
the Galaxy has several advanced species, yes. But at the time where
only one civilisation is capable of space travel, as [presuambly] at
the time of the Protheans? The number of available planets will be
greater than the need for them, especially if you species has a slow
reproductive cycle.
Logical, but so far evidence in this game suggests every garden world would be hit with at least a small colony. A garden planet with earth's potential would be a very prime target for colonization. The protheans may be an outlier in many respects, benevolence, single species cycle etc. So far all we know is that species we know of want to explore, and the species we know of want to colonize.
MrBeardface wrote...
4) They would have to either arrive at a
time when modern humans weren't yet evolved or significantly on their
way to becoming modern humans, or be 'renegade' enough not to give a
damn.
It's easy for those advanced civilisations to miss at
least one of those four points. Protheans might have ticked the first
three, but it's likely the had a 'hands off' approach to development of
new sentient species.
Intelligent beings on this planet are extremely recent, it would be no more crude than for us to settle on a planet with Pyjaks except in maybe the last two cycles. The protheans may have been unusually benevolent regardless. Even so, the number of humans would have been extremely small, an advanced colony need not have displaced or eliminated our ancestors to co-exist.
For what its worth MrBeardFace you make some excellent points here, simply debating, not necessarily disagreeing.
Modifié par Cyadina, 24 février 2010 - 01:44 .