Shepard will join the Reapers in the End.
#26
Posté 24 février 2010 - 03:21
I'm not saying it's not possible, I'm just saying it's not likely.
#27
Posté 24 février 2010 - 03:29
And as far as the derelict reaper is concerned, that was a dead reaper so the effects of indoctrination probably wouldn't have been as strong, and Shepard was on board a total of what? 15 minutes?
For Shepard to all of a sudden be indoctrinated at the beginning of ME3 would leave plot hole bigger than Legion's chest.
#28
Posté 24 février 2010 - 05:14
MrRattenburg wrote...
This theory doesn't make any sense. On Feros Shiala said that indoctrination was a slow process, Benezia said that it would takes days or weeks. This would point towards long term exposure to a reaper. How much exposure does Shepard actually have with reapers? Not only was he never in Sovereign, but the closest he ever got to Sovereign was at the top of Citadel Tower during the attack on the Citadel, and any indoctrination that may have taken place probably would have been broken when Sovereign was destroyed.
And as far as the derelict reaper is concerned, that was a dead reaper so the effects of indoctrination probably wouldn't have been as strong, and Shepard was on board a total of what? 15 minutes?
For Shepard to all of a sudden be indoctrinated at the beginning of ME3 would leave plot hole bigger than Legion's chest.
No the indoctrination process depends upon the signal strength emitted by the Reaper. It can be very quick if the Reaper desires it or very subtle. The asari scientist in Virmire mentioned about it.
Also I totally forgot about EDI! The AI was constructed with some Reaper parts salvaged from Sovereign. After Joker unlocks EDI's core near the end, it takes full control of the Normandy. In essence, EDI BECOMES the Normandy. Perhaps EDI now has the power to indoctrinate people as well. I am afraid Joker has fallen victim, he is willing to do anything for EDI ("I love seeing humans on their knees.")
Modifié par corebit, 24 février 2010 - 05:16 .
#29
Posté 24 février 2010 - 05:20
#30
Guest_FaintlyAlarmed_*
Posté 24 février 2010 - 05:49
Guest_FaintlyAlarmed_*
corebit wrote...
MrRattenburg wrote...
This theory doesn't make any sense. On Feros Shiala said that indoctrination was a slow process, Benezia said that it would takes days or weeks. This would point towards long term exposure to a reaper. How much exposure does Shepard actually have with reapers? Not only was he never in Sovereign, but the closest he ever got to Sovereign was at the top of Citadel Tower during the attack on the Citadel, and any indoctrination that may have taken place probably would have been broken when Sovereign was destroyed.
And as far as the derelict reaper is concerned, that was a dead reaper so the effects of indoctrination probably wouldn't have been as strong, and Shepard was on board a total of what? 15 minutes?
For Shepard to all of a sudden be indoctrinated at the beginning of ME3 would leave plot hole bigger than Legion's chest.
No the indoctrination process depends upon the signal strength emitted by the Reaper. It can be very quick if the Reaper desires it or very subtle. The asari scientist in Virmire mentioned about it.
Also I totally forgot about EDI! The AI was constructed with some Reaper parts salvaged from Sovereign. After Joker unlocks EDI's core near the end, it takes full control of the Normandy. In essence, EDI BECOMES the Normandy. Perhaps EDI now has the power to indoctrinate people as well. I am afraid Joker has fallen victim, he is willing to do anything for EDI ("I love seeing humans on their knees."). Shepard will become the next victim.
:ph34r:
Yeah, but the 'quick' version of indoctrination pretty much destroys the victim's nervous system. What's left is pretty much a brainless meat-puppet.
Also, the derelict Reaper was kind of dead. It's indoctrintion system was still active, but it wouldn't have been able to indoctro-zap Shepard in the half-hour he/she was on board - no concious mind left to direct the indoctrination. The baby Reaper was hardly more developed than the Reaper-equivalent of a fetus. And was probably busier fighting for survival to try anything fancy.
#31
Posté 24 février 2010 - 05:52
Therefore indoctrination signals don't come from Reaper "cores" which is probably what the baby Reaper is, it's a seperate piece of technology.
#32
Posté 24 février 2010 - 05:56
No it doesn't. You assume that if Shepard sided with the reapers and destroyed the Council in a single surprise attack, (which would be the logical ending of ME3 if they went that route), there could not be a subsequent story arc detailing the ensuing struggle by another character to defeat Shepard and his 'Reapers'.DeadlyParasite wrote...
You'd be right, if it wasn't for the fact that EA and BioWare have come out and stated that more games in the Mass Effect series could and probably will be made.
Your theory conflicts with their considerations.
#33
Posté 24 février 2010 - 05:57
Pretty sure they uncovered some ancient technology that turned them into husks, the planet itself didn'tThe Angry One wrote...
You don't actually need a Reaper to indoctrinate; there was a planet in ME1.. I forget which, where you find a survey team all went mad and turned themselves into husks. Basically indoctrinated.
Therefore indoctrination signals don't come from Reaper "cores" which is probably what the baby Reaper is, it's a seperate piece of technology.
#34
Guest_PureMethodActor_*
Posté 24 février 2010 - 05:59
Guest_PureMethodActor_*
something along those lines, at least...
#35
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:04
Lukertin wrote...
Pretty sure they uncovered some ancient technology that turned them into husks, the planet itself didn'tThe Angry One wrote...
You don't actually need a Reaper to indoctrinate; there was a planet in ME1.. I forget which, where you find a survey team all went mad and turned themselves into husks. Basically indoctrinated.
Therefore indoctrination signals don't come from Reaper "cores" which is probably what the baby Reaper is, it's a seperate piece of technology.
They unconvered "dragons teeth" husk converters. No sane person is going to throw themselves on one of those voluntarily.
#36
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:05
The Angry One wrote...
You don't actually need a Reaper to indoctrinate; there was a planet in ME1.. I forget which, where you find a survey team all went mad and turned themselves into husks. Basically indoctrinated.
Therefore indoctrination signals don't come from Reaper "cores" which is probably what the baby Reaper is, it's a seperate piece of technology.
Are you talking about the planet where they excavated a bunch of dragon's teeth and promptly impaled themselves upon them?
#37
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:06
Wild Still wrote...
screwoffreg wrote...
lol that's what my fanfic says. Bioware, stop stealing my ideas!!
Is that the one where Captain Kirk is a chinchilla?
Nah it's probably something even more ridiculous, like all female aliens, that are blue skinned tarts.
or something just as ridiculous.
#38
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:09
That planet had not only the dragon's teeth, there was also a strange artifact similar to the one the geth on Feros were worshipping. I don't think the planet itself indoctrinated the researchers there.The Angry One wrote...
Lukertin wrote...
Pretty sure they uncovered some ancient technology that turned them into husks, the planet itself didn'tThe Angry One wrote...
You don't actually need a Reaper to indoctrinate; there was a planet in ME1.. I forget which, where you find a survey team all went mad and turned themselves into husks. Basically indoctrinated.
Therefore indoctrination signals don't come from Reaper "cores" which is probably what the baby Reaper is, it's a seperate piece of technology.
They unconvered "dragons teeth" husk converters. No sane person is going to throw themselves on one of those voluntarily.
#39
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:12
For example, letting technology develop might make possible inter-galactic travel, and reapers are no more than custom officers, making sure that potentially dangerous new species do not go happily developing over a territory long claimed by their masters. The milky is a very small part of the universe after all..
Alongside this idea, some dark energy theories, and the will of the reapers to drive technological devlpment in a given way, It might be that any other way of travel (most probably wormholes) could wreck the whole universe to oblivion, not just a bunch of sentients here and then.
From sovereign we only know that the reapers are reckless, but their true motivation is still unknown.
Modifié par cyanrabbit, 24 février 2010 - 06:16 .
#40
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:12
marshalleck wrote...
That planet had not only the dragon's teeth, there was also a strange artifact similar to the one the geth on Feros were worshipping. I don't think the planet itself indoctrinated the researchers there.The Angry One wrote...
Lukertin wrote...
Pretty sure they uncovered some ancient technology that turned them into husks, the planet itself didn'tThe Angry One wrote...
You don't actually need a Reaper to indoctrinate; there was a planet in ME1.. I forget which, where you find a survey team all went mad and turned themselves into husks. Basically indoctrinated.
Therefore indoctrination signals don't come from Reaper "cores" which is probably what the baby Reaper is, it's a seperate piece of technology.
They unconvered "dragons teeth" husk converters. No sane person is going to throw themselves on one of those voluntarily.
I'm not saying the planet did, I'm saying indoctrinator signals may come from a piece of technology seperate from a Reaper core, like what was found on the planet.
#41
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:25
Purely speculative but I like the sound of it.
#42
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:41
I think it'd be an interesting choice: you could either destroy the reapers and thus keep humanity in its short-lived organic form, or side with them and give humans some form of immortality.
Modifié par Marta Rio, 24 février 2010 - 06:41 .
#43
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:41
#44
Posté 24 février 2010 - 08:18
If this for some ridiculous reason does become a plot point in ME3, there had better be a darn good explanation for it. Otherwise it completely contradicts everything they've said over the last two games.
#45
Posté 24 février 2010 - 08:31
Also, concerning the Reaper indoctrination doesn't it take a substantial amount of time to take effect? Shepards spent a few hours blowing them up in spectacular ways but likely not long enough around them to be affected.
Personally, I think there could be something else out there besides the Reapers, perhaps whom they are in conflict with.
#46
Posté 24 février 2010 - 08:35
#47
Posté 24 février 2010 - 08:36
So I think we can expect at least 1 dark ending.
#48
Posté 24 février 2010 - 08:41
I believe your theory has some flaws.
-godeshus
#49
Posté 24 février 2010 - 08:51
#50
Posté 24 février 2010 - 08:51





Retour en haut






