Drasanil wrote...
First of all since you ignored all the major points I made, I guessing you didn't really have an answer to them...
Right... since I answered your own statement of "In short" instead of your long explanation. I guess I actually assumed your "In short" was a short representation of your entire view.
1) She ruled despite her husband having the "pedigree." It is made apparent she kept the Banns and other rulers in check while being respected. Apparently the majority of the people that mattered viewed her as being just fine despite not having an impecible pedigree. You can argue this all you want but the game states otherwise so fight it's codex entry and what people in the game say and not me. Call them liars and false entries, but it's that and not me that make such claims. It's made obvious that as long as those are semi-accurate she is viewed as a respected ruler by many whether or not her husband has the real pedigree or not. In the end I'll believe the game and it's codex entry over you
2) You state she is weak, the codex entry states she isn't and others in the game support that. Again I'll believe them over you. The King died and yes she is only Queen because she married the King, that's an obvious. No matter how strong of a Queen she is civil war would ensue when people are trying to take power. No single person has an exclusive claim to the throne, hence civil war. People want to take power so they will fight. Such a thing is common and is due to the death of Cailan not to a lacking of her. If she was a weak Queen she wouldn't even have a shot for the throne, on the other hand only her and Alistair have a shot and despite Alistair actually having the bloodline she can be made Queen and accepted just fine. This suggests your statements of her are simply wrong. Again I'll believe the game over you.
3) Right Eamon is obviously a traditionalist who wants the Therin bloodline to continue. This is made obvious in the RtO letters and Loghain himself says this if you keep him alive. Eamon isn't the only voice I'm affraid and quite honestly Eamon is fairly manipulative in his own way.
" putting Anora on the throne alone (or with the HMN) should really cause more problems than putting Alistair alone"
A valid opinion but an opinion, I simply disagree. She's known to rule for five years to me that expresses a level of comfort. A new and unknown King taking the throne on the other hand seems very awkward and it also very much looks like a power play to Eamon which would put the other nobles on edge, while Anora has been ruling as Queen and people know she can do it.
" I get the impression that solo Anora getting a "good" ending, as opposed to political chaos and all the fun of having a largely illegitimate peasant on the throne, was simply done to avoid pissing off those that chose her or those that chose to usurp Alistair."
Again opinion and you can have that opinion... I completely and utterly disagree. Everything in the game suggests she has been a good ruler for the last five years and the epilogue slides suggest she continues on being a good ruler. Why is it so hard for you to believe the game? I mean you don't have to but again your fighting the codex entry, what some say, and the epilogue slides themselves. It seems painfully obvious that Anora is good at governing if very cold, but a strong ruler. The fact that she does what she needs to remain in power suggests that strength. No one is perfect of course and you see the negative side of her. Just like the two Dwarven Kings, one turns out to be a good ruler but goes for total power, while the other keeps tradition but does nothing significant.
4) Yes she backstabs you. She has a dark side, just like everyone else in this game. Duncan is willing to watch people die with an ultimatum to recruit them. The Warden PC can do some pretty horrible things beyond that backstab even. This is a Dark Fantasy, people do what they do to keep and/or gain power, this doesn't mean they're a bad ruler, just have some character flaws. This is realistic, everyone has character flaws, hers are just fairly apparent.
5) Again complete opinion and one I completely disagree with. Everything suggests she keeps the Banns under her control and influence quite well and makes decisions that causes her nation to prosper. Again I'll side with the game's content on this.
What the codex says and what actually is aren't nessessarily the exact same things, you kind of have to read between the lines, Anora was a "strong" leader because Cailan was backing her and giving her an air of legitimacy, if it weren't for that she wouldn't have been able to rule or do much of anything, it was Cailan's strength more than anything else that made her effective, she just knew how to use it/take advantage of him.
Ummm... yes she wouldn't have legitimacy if she didn't marry the King. That's pretty obvious. She's Queen because she married the King, obviously. Cailan's strength didn't make her effective, marrying him put her as Queen. I will believe the codex entry over you when it says that it's common knowledge that she was the one that ruled and that Cailan wasn't the one keeping Ferelden running... I'll quote the codex here:
It is common knowledge that in the five years Anora and Cailan held the throne together, she was the one wielding the power. She is held in much higher esteem than her husband by the people of Ferelden, nobility and commoners alike, and commands the respect even of foreign nations, having once inspired Empress Celene of Orlais to declare, "Anora of Ferelden is a solitary rose among brambles
So either I go with your gut feeling or I go with this Codex. I'll go with the codex. It makes it very apparent she was a respected ruler.
Secondly while Loghain says he didn't "plan" to supplant her, he effectively did so any ways ence the civil war, which is why she is a weak Queen otherwise she would have been able to maintain her authority and there wouldn't have been a civil war in the middle of a massive darkspawn invasion/blight.
Loghain had control of the military, it's not uncommon for a military leader to be able to take control even over a powerful ruler, on top of her husband dying. The King dying and the darskpawn invading created chaos and Loghain took what control he could. Despite her being the actual ruler for the last five years Cailan was in fact the King, him dying does in fact create issues and Loghain brandishing his military power enhances this. She also obviously has a soft spot for her father, I'm sure many of us can sympathize with that.
He also identifies how well respected and effective a ruler she has been and how the Banns and such know this. So she is identified as a strong candidate since she has been ruling successfully.
She "ruled" a country during peacetime with a King who's was widly viewed in a positive light and gave her legitimacy while her daddy did all the work keep things safe, she'd have to suck pretty bad to mess it up.
Lol, agian your opinion. I'll yet again rely on the codex entry rather than your claims. Make them all you want, fair enough, but I prefer to rely on what the game gives me.





Retour en haut





