283 réponses à ce sujet

[Ponce de Leon]

I did it the first time in 25 hours and 20 minutes. BUT I finished just on level 18, making me think I skipped 70 percent of the sidequests. And that is true I guess. Also, I never read the codex until my last run, which was done on nightmare. Still, all I got was 7 hours more of gameplay, quests completed almost 100% (almost because of two quests : the one with the traps in Lothering and the one that requires survival at the Dalish camp). I don't own RtO and WK though.
Edit : also, won't be able to post some screenshots until Friday. For now, look at one not-really 100% completed game under my characters... I forgot the name... Should be Nelesea I think. That one was pretty fast. And I can't forge that information as someone could with screenshots... It's also the one character that got uploaded 100%.

Modifié par dark-lauron, 03 mars 2010 - 07:40 .

[nubbers666]

15 to 20hrs x 6 thats a good amount of game play for me lol

[OrionUnas]

Andwing wrote...

le_cygne wrote...
Just out of curiosity, can you (or anyone) point me in the direction of this conference call/transcript/source? I'd be interested to hear it, out of pure curiosity.

And, as an aside, count me as another very experienced CRPG player who spent over 100 hours on my first play through without any particular difficulties moving forward in combat or elsewhere. Some of us just enjoy speaking to all of the NPCs in extreme depth, reading all the codices, exploring every niche of every map, and so forth.

You can find offical statements, such as press releases, call transcripts and earnings reports right on EA.  Just start looking from 2007 onwards, DA is there, and much like the little subsidiary I work for, is often little more than a line on the earnings report.

Caveat emptour, but the basic jist was that EA seemed send signals it thought DA was a risky franchise, practically dismising the PC crowd.  I do believe that Riccitiello was quoted as saying something like, Dragon age is not a risk.  Then saying, Dragon Age is not a sure thing.  For certain, DA was the red-headed step child of ME, SWTOR:Online and their other non Bio fancises.  Currently, it's the golden goose.  I don't know if that's a good thing or a not.

It has been stated that the gameplay for PC and 360 are vastley different.  Console versions of the game play like KOTOR, while PC versions play as Baldur's Gate.  Various Reviews, and i'm sure old posts from the forums, agree to this point.  So, I'm assumeing thats why you have had a quicker play through.

I'm sure the learning curve to the other players where ones who havn't played Baldur's Gate or NWN.  However, I took my time with DA:O, and finished it in 70 hours, i think my first play though.  I recently reinstalled the game, and took an other 70 hours, with DLC.

Edit: The last 70 hours play though that I stated was actually the last time I looked, I don't actually know what this play through was.

Reading the text is defenitly faster then hearing them talk, with there pauses and dialect.  I would assume that reading the diologue is faster then hearing it, since when I bore of hearing the diologue, or want to progress faster, I will read it hit esc, then read the next diologue.   I try not to do that, because I love this game.

I do hope however that the game play will be worth the bucks.

Modifié par OrionUnas, 03 mars 2010 - 09:59 .

[Red Frostraven]

RangerSG wrote...

Noilly Prat wrote...

I don't care what anyone says. I will be surprised if I take fewer than thirty hours to finish it. I'm a completionist, and a slow player besides. I took around 120 hours getting through DA:O. Hell, I took over 60 on my first ME2 playthrough.

I have learned over the years how to read a playthrough time estimate for a game and convert it to "me hours." It usually comes to much more than the estimate.

Me too. I finished DA:O at 123 hours. And I don't get how anyone could've played it first time in under 70 like some claim. At least not on the PC. *shrugs* It sounds like the standard hours estimate for an expansion, which I have always come in at least 50% higher than.

Completing EACH AND EVERY QUEST on my first and roleplaying run-through, with Watcher's Keep and Shale DLC -- I ticked in at 57 hours on the main campaign.

[RangerSG]

Red Frostraven wrote...

RangerSG wrote...

Noilly Prat wrote...

I don't care what anyone says. I will be surprised if I take fewer than thirty hours to finish it. I'm a completionist, and a slow player besides. I took around 120 hours getting through DA:O. Hell, I took over 60 on my first ME2 playthrough.

I have learned over the years how to read a playthrough time estimate for a game and convert it to "me hours." It usually comes to much more than the estimate.

Me too. I finished DA:O at 123 hours. And I don't get how anyone could've played it first time in under 70 like some claim. At least not on the PC. *shrugs* It sounds like the standard hours estimate for an expansion, which I have always come in at least 50% higher than.

Completing EACH AND EVERY QUEST on my first and roleplaying run-through, with Watcher's Keep and Shale DLC -- I ticked in at 57 hours on the main campaign.

OK...that was a snip that makes it look like I was judging others' playtime when I wasn't. If you snip, you really should save the context of the quotation to be fair to the OP.

And as I've said, your playtime is your own. I've played CRPGs since BG. Again to my point, which I stated in the post you snipped to. "Different people will play the game differently." And your idea of RPing may be different than mine.

[RangerSG]

le_cygne wrote...

RangerSG wrote...

The only people on this thread who are making assumptions about how other people play the game are the people (like you did) who assume that anyone who takes longer than them must be "idling" or "bad at combat."

Sorry, no that's rubbish. 123.6, I won't say I 'never' hit the pause button to deal with RL. But I'm an adult with a wife and a real world job. I have better things to do than run the time up on a GAME.

I won't assume you cheated yourself out of a more meaningful experience with the game if you won't assume you know how those who took longer than you were "wasting time." Fair enough? Different people play games--especially RPGs-- different ways. Stop assuming you know what other people do. It really ought not be a hard thing to do to assume you can guess people's actions and motives from the other side of a monitor.

Thank you. Well said.

As someone else with a busy personal and professional life who enjoys taking time to play the game (yes, with an occasional pause), I was too miffed at the bickering to address this (including the "ZOMG proovez you did it so fastz!" posts), but I'm glad you took the time.

If people get satisfaction from making decisions quickly and plowing through enemies, that's their prerogative, and I respect it. But I'd rather enjoy in-depth conversation options that vary on different play throughs. I'd rather enjoy a well-written setting and its lore. Slaughtering darkspawn on Nightmare is fun, but decidedly secondary to my enjoyment: if I want to kill stuff, I'll play Half-Life or Gears of War. If I want to do it strategically, I'll play StarCraft. It's the height of presumption to assume that the players on these forums who explore the game in the most time and depth are the least experienced, particularly when many (most?) of us cut our teeth on CRPG classics from  originals like Ultima to story-driven masterpieces like Torment.

Sure, it's silly, pointless, and perhaps even rude to ask someone to prove his playtime. Who cares? Why would I doubt you?  Even if you were lying, why would I care? But--regardless of how you prefer to play personally--if you don't understand how someone could spend more than ~40 hours playing a game like Dragon Age, I daresay you're missing the point entirely. And when you judge others on that misconception and assume that they're playing poorly or "wrong," you're going to come off as ignorant at best, and possibly as a jerk, too.

(Thanks, too, Ranger, for the shareholder references earlier. Interesting reading for me as a trader who doesn't usually play the gaming sector, though sad, if expected, as an RPG fan.  )

My pleasure. Like I said. I could be entirely wrong in my guess. I think I'd rather hope I am. But it's not an uneducated one. I do know something of economics and human nature. Also, on the (to be fair not-insignificant) marketing push for DA:O. I agree they did make an effort on promotion. Though ME got more attention, and of course, compare either Bioware game's marketing from EA to the endless "MADDEN" and even "FIFA" promoting. EA markets, give them credit for that. But even then, put DA in the context of those pushes and decide what they invested their hopes in?

[Wishpig]

outlaworacle wrote...

Couldn't help but notice he doesn't have a single achievement listed, either. I have a character who's finished the game that hasn't updated on the site since Level 9, but Achievements are practically the one thing that always upload.

Actually, he could easily have the same bug as me (and a few others.) I had the whole character not updating issue nor was it updating any achievements for me.  After my first two playthroughs I uninstalled the game cause I wanted to restart with a clean vanilla version. I reinstalled it and still had the above problem. Then all of a sudden I stopped getting the "can't connect to player profile" message, and everything worked fine. However, Random achievements are updating on my profile, and my game isn't informing me I unlocked any of them, whats even wierder is I'm getting some achievments I'm pretty damn sure I never unlocked. I also think my loss of shapeshifter spec is due to whatever this issue is (although thank god it was only shapeshifter, the lamest spec in the game!).

I really really really wish Dragon Age didn't have all this b******.

[RangerSG]

Wishpig wrote...

outlaworacle wrote...

Couldn't help but notice he doesn't have a single achievement listed, either. I have a character who's finished the game that hasn't updated on the site since Level 9, but Achievements are practically the one thing that always upload.

Actually, he could easily have the same bug as me (and a few others.) I had the whole character not updating issue nor was it updating any achievements for me.  After my first two playthroughs I uninstalled the game cause I wanted to restart with a clean vanilla version. I reinstalled it and still had the above problem. Then all of a sudden I stopped getting the "can't connect to player profile" message, and everything worked fine. However, Random achievements are updating on my profile, and my game isn't informing me I unlocked any of them, whats even wierder is I'm getting some achievments I'm pretty damn sure I never unlocked. I also think my loss of shapeshifter spec is due to whatever this issue is (although thank god it was only shapeshifter, the lamest spec in the game!).

I really really really wish Dragon Age didn't have all this b******.

I have to agree on this. My profile updates achievements at whacky intervals. Sometimes days after I've actually unlocked them IG. Using the profile check is not infallible. And again, accusing anyone they have or have not completed the game or played it "well" is pointless. I do think there is relevance when it comes to the whole, "Well I played DA in 30hrs, so Awakening is going to take no time" thing. If you approach an RPG like an action game, with the intention of bull-rushing through it, your playtime will be considerably shorter than the norm. The key to getting the most out of an RPG (IMHO) has next to nothing to do with combat. And that is nearly 180 out from an action game or a RTS game.

[PaladinXR]

I think there are a few things to think about: track record, initial investment, and current comparisons.



So looking at previous bioware titles (BG, NWN and the ilk) and their expansions, I kinda see a big divergence. If i remember correctly, most of the expansions were actually quite similar in length to the main game (though it's been quite a few years) and cost about $20 less....I remember paying $50 for the original game and $30 for the expansion. In that sense, pricewise, it's not that big of a difference. However, lengthwise, from bioware, this isn't par for the course.



Also, this expansion seems to just add story as opposed to really new areas (i mean, it seems like all the areas are just re-textured). The entire expansion comes just 4 months after the release of the main game, which kinda makes me wonder as to the effort vs. cost to players.We payed $50-60 for the original game....where we were paying for the game engine development, story telling, gameplay, and length of game, all of which took many, many years to develop. So basically we're saving $20 because the engine is already finished, the gameplay is there, and they cut the storyline by 3/4....so if we wanted a full game length wise, it'd cost $160.



That being said, we do live in an age where people pay $60 for a 15 hour game, and $10 for 1-2 hour dlc, so we might actually be lucky only paying $40.



As for me, I will be playing FFXIII for a while...maybe i'll be getting the expansion when the price drops.

[RangerSG]

PaladinXR wrote...

I think there are a few things to think about: track record, initial investment, and current comparisons.

So looking at previous bioware titles (BG, NWN and the ilk) and their expansions, I kinda see a big divergence. If i remember correctly, most of the expansions were actually quite similar in length to the main game (though it's been quite a few years) and cost about $20 less....I remember paying $50 for the original game and $30 for the expansion. In that sense, pricewise, it's not that big of a difference. However, lengthwise, from bioware, this isn't par for the course.

Also, this expansion seems to just add story as opposed to really new areas (i mean, it seems like all the areas are just re-textured). The entire expansion comes just 4 months after the release of the main game, which kinda makes me wonder as to the effort vs. cost to players.We payed $50-60 for the original game....where we were paying for the game engine development, story telling, gameplay, and length of game, all of which took many, many years to develop. So basically we're saving $20 because the engine is already finished, the gameplay is there, and they cut the storyline by 3/4....so if we wanted a full game length wise, it'd cost $160.

That being said, we do live in an age where people pay $60 for a 15 hour game, and $10 for 1-2 hour dlc, so we might actually be lucky only paying $40.

As for me, I will be playing FFXIII for a while...maybe i'll be getting the expansion when the price drops.

Ok...you remember incorrectly. Like or dislike the NWNOC, it was upwards of 20 hours for the first chapter (admittedly the longest, but there were three others). Both SoU and Hordes were rated for that number in their entirety.

Tales of the Sword Coast was nowhere near as long as BG. It added 2 long adventures, but nothing to the story, as such. And it was really no more than 10 hours of gametime, compared to the 100+ of BG. Throne of Bhaal was originally going to complete the Baldur's Gate "trilogy." But still it was less than half as long as BG2.

So no, the expansions have not been anywhere near as long as their parent games. That is simply fallacious.

[JKJEDIKNIGHT]

To put a few last things to rest here (hopefully). My very FIRST playthrough on DA:O came in at 31 hours. When I did the one I consider the completionist run it came in just under 50 hours. My fastest run ever (skipping all cutscenes, xing through all dialogue, skipping all sidequests) isn't finished yet, but will clock in under 10 hours I believe. But don't quote me on that yet. I've seen that some of you have said you paused it to do other things? Does that mean you like paused it and went to the store or something? I don't leave my games on when I leave them, even if it's for a minute because I only play them in around 2-3 hour intervals due to work/family/etc. So if some of you are leaving the game on while you go off and do whatever, obviously these minutes or hours will obviously effect your playthrough time. I'm not saying that this is where the extra 50 hours is coming from, but every little bit eventually adds up to the big discrepancy we have here. Just food for thought. My only experience with Expansion Packs comes from Warcraft haha. And I'm not talking WoW, I'm talking Warcraft 2. How many people do we have here who played those? lol. I honestly don't even remember what I paid for the Warcraft 2 expansion. Warcraft II Beyond the Dark Portal. LOL those were the days :-p

[RangerSG]

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...

To put a few last things to rest here (hopefully). My very FIRST playthrough on DA:O came in at 31 hours. When I did the one I consider the completionist run it came in just under 50 hours. My fastest run ever (skipping all cutscenes, xing through all dialogue, skipping all sidequests) isn't finished yet, but will clock in under 10 hours I believe. But don't quote me on that yet. I've seen that some of you have said you paused it to do other things? Does that mean you like paused it and went to the store or something? I don't leave my games on when I leave them, even if it's for a minute because I only play them in around 2-3 hour intervals due to work/family/etc. So if some of you are leaving the game on while you go off and do whatever, obviously these minutes or hours will obviously effect your playthrough time. I'm not saying that this is where the extra 50 hours is coming from, but every little bit eventually adds up to the big discrepancy we have here. Just food for thought. My only experience with Expansion Packs comes from Warcraft haha. And I'm not talking WoW, I'm talking Warcraft 2. How many people do we have here who played those? lol. I honestly don't even remember what I paid for the Warcraft 2 expansion. Warcraft II Beyond the Dark Portal. LOL those were the days :-p

Hours? I think I would've had a hard time protesting the charge of "idling" if it was for "hours" no? Come on.

No, 5 mins or so, and that's at the long end. And that's because shutting down the game then coming back and reloading would take LONGER on a PC. And no, it's not a routine thing. Not even enough to add an hour.

Stop trying to assume you know how other people play. Alright? Can we just let that rest? Or do you have to keep trying to judge other people from the other side of a monitor?

Again, I haven't had a playthrough LESS than 70 hours yet. That's just the way I play the game. Deal with it. I don't "want" speed runs. And I *never* skip cutscenes. I'll escape through dialogues occasionally, but rarely. To me it ruins the experience of playing to cut through stuff like that. That's me. As I've repeatedly said, everyone plays an RPG differently. Don't assume you understand what other people do.

I get how some people may think Awakenings may come in short. I've expressed my concerns about the expansion at length on this and other threads. But the whole, "I'm so much better at the game because i played it in 30 hrs, woot!" line was rubbish and unnecessary. And trying to make yourself into a victim when you launched the attacks was beyond absurd.

[Tsuga C]

You're still attempting to teach pigs to sing, RangerSG?  

[dogonthetrack]

Count me into the 40 is too much for an expansion. No way will I be getting this one for a while.

[Fishy]

At the epilogue of Origin .. It's state that (Common sense) your companions after a while left you because they have their own hmm .. THING TO DO.Awakening happens several years after the events of Origins..

12-15 hours long it's reasonable  for an expansion .It's add more than just quest..But add item and specialization and class.

Bioware always made fabulous expansion and with the rise of DLC i want to encourage them to continue making them.I loved the NWN expansion .. In the second expansion they even added robe and very cool looking armor.

My Dragon age's very modified though .. I have the new texture pack .. The Ashes model for morrigan/Sten/Leliana ... Eyes glowing .. white teeth .. new tatoo .. new hairstyle ... also new face model (better one imo,closer to the lore thing) for many character.I hope it won't pimp the expansion.

Haven't installed the modified  sex cutscene though .. Because seriously the one i found  it's basicly pornographic   ..

But wow .. the ashes armor for Leliana and Morrigan just look epic

[JKJEDIKNIGHT]

RangerSG wrote...

Hours? I think I would've had a hard time protesting the charge of "idling" if it was for "hours" no? Come on.

No, 5 mins or so, and that's at the long end. And that's because shutting down the game then coming back and reloading would take LONGER on a PC. And no, it's not a routine thing. Not even enough to add an hour.

Stop trying to assume you know how other people play. Alright? Can we just let that rest? Or do you have to keep trying to judge other people from the other side of a monitor?

Again, I haven't had a playthrough LESS than 70 hours yet. That's just the way I play the game. Deal with it. I don't "want" speed runs. And I *never* skip cutscenes. I'll escape through dialogues occasionally, but rarely. To me it ruins the experience of playing to cut through stuff like that. That's me. As I've repeatedly said, everyone plays an RPG differently. Don't assume you understand what other people do.

I get how some people may think Awakenings may come in short. I've expressed my concerns about the expansion at length on this and other threads. But the whole, "I'm so much better at the game because i played it in 30 hrs, woot!" line was rubbish and unnecessary. And trying to make yourself into a victim when you launched the attacks was beyond absurd.

Okay first.  Dude, how about you chill the f out.  When have I EVER judged someone on here about the way they play?  I have asked questions.  I asked if people were letting the game run on pause while they were away.  Get off my case.  So sorry I asked a question here.  Woah excuse me all to hell.  Next time I need to ask a question I'll run it past you to check to see if I'm judging anyone.  That okay with you?  2nd, I explained how I attained my faster run times for the person on here who is calling me a cheat, liar, and fraud.  Whether you care or not, I don't care.  And at this point, god himself could confirm I beat DA:O in 5000 hours and that guy would say god lies.  Only some screen shot from my XB360 is going to "convince" him.  But as I said before, I'm sure he'd come up with some pixel that looked off and claim it was a fraud.  I will just allow the fact that other people here have "claimed" to have beaten it as fast, or faster than I serve as proof that I have done it as well.  And if you can quote me where I ran people down for beating it faster, then go through and get the quote, because I've already said, the one comment I made was about whether I was "just that good", or people were that bad, and it was written as a joking line.  You're the one that is all over my case ever since.  I get it, you didn't think it was funny, now ****** off.  Yes, I beat it faster than you.  Does that make me better?  I never said that, YOU'RE the one putting those words in my mouth.

[JKJEDIKNIGHT]

My first play through was on Normal, and I did not skip the dialogue, I did not read every Codex entry since most of them have no real purpose to the quest of the game. That said, I did not do EVERY side quest, I did however complete most of them since I know what they all are, and my character finished at level 23 and I did this in 31 hours. So how some of you get over 100 hours, I just don't see possible. Even putting it on Nightmare only added around 2 hours more to my next game play. My "completionist" character which I used on my 4th or 5th game I used the PRIMA Guide to do all possible side quests and that game only topped out at about 44ish. So someone please tell me how you're getting 100 hours out of this. Are you people just really slow readers when you read the Codex? I can't imagine that the 360 version (which I have) and the PC is that drastically different play through wise.

lol. Either people are just REALLY bad at games or I'm just that good. And I'm not about toting my own ego here, but seriously, how can you people take so long for this?

I never said I zipped through the dialogue, I read all the dialogue, otherwise I wouldn't know what decisions I wanted to make. My 31 hour play through I didn't read ALL the codex entries I discovered, I only read the ones I felt had a baring on the immediate storyline. Regardless, the 31 hour character had completed almost every side quest as well, so that still doesn't add up to how I'm somehow missing 70 hours in comparison to some of you. Because I know it doesn't take 70 hours to read all the Codex in the entire game. My character with all side quests completed and 100% of the world discovered has barely under 50. So really the math doesn't add up to me on how you people take so long. Maybe it's your battle tactics. Do you people actually use the traps and create different items to use in battle such as acid flasks etc? I don't use any of that. My team consists of 2 Warriors 1 Rogue 1 Mage and I play take no prisoner all out attack. I whip through battles, perhaps this is it. But idk. I guess you people are slow or something idk.

Like I said before, I used the PRIMA Guide on one of my play throughs, my "completionist". I completed every side quest, collected every Codex entry, and got every unique piece of equipment. All in under 50 hours. And I'll go out on a limb here and state confidently enough that I DOUBT if I read every Codex entry it's going to take another 50 hours. But regardless, we can debate this until doomsday, obviously you people are doing something WAAAAAY different than I am, and that's fine, but when it comes to an estimate of 15-20 hours I just question whether that is 15-20 of you kind of people's hours, or mine. Cause if it's you guys, I'd be concerned that I would whip through Awakening in 5 hours. Which isn't worth my money. I don't buy a lot of games, but when I do, I look to see how much time I will actually get out of the game. If it seems like a generous amount of time, then I buy it, if not, then it's just not worth the time. And we can gripe about how some game like say Assassin's Creed 2 people say they took like 5-10 hours on. Well hense the reason I didn't buy that. I don't go and buy these shooter games that people whip through in 4-5 hours, I get games that will actually keep me entertained for a long time. And it also has to have that redraw ability. Something that I could pick up 3 or 4 years later and be able to play through again. I recently just started playing Final Fantasy X again. I already have 30 hours in that and I have just gotten to Macalenia Temple. Games like that are worth my $60, not something that will not even pass 30 hours.

Here are the replies I had on this thread until you started to put in your nickel and dime Ranger. Please point out to me where I personally ran you into the ground about being such a lousy gamer, then ran off with your wife while your slow ass was playing DA:O because I beat it 5000 hours before you. Thanks.

Modifié par JKJEDIKNIGHT, 04 mars 2010 - 01:18 .

[Yrkoon]

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...


Okay first.  Dude, how about you chill the f out.  When have I EVER judged someone on here about the way they play?  I have asked questions. .

<gag>  Who in the world  do you think you're kidding?


Lets see....

Page 5:

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...
 But idk. I guess you people are slow or something idk.

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...
lol.  Either people are just REALLY bad at games or I'm just that good. 

^these are judgements... even INSULTS.  They're certainly not questions now, are they.

Modifié par Yrkoon, 04 mars 2010 - 01:36 .

[JKJEDIKNIGHT]

Yrkoon wrote...

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...


Okay first.  Dude, how about you chill the f out.  When have I EVER judged someone on here about the way they play?  I have asked questions. .

 Lets see....

Page 5:

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...
 But idk. I guess you people are slow or something idk.

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...
lol.  Either people are just REALLY bad at games or I'm just that good. 

^these are judgements... even INSULTS.  They're certainly not questions now, are they.

The first comment you are leaving out all the other points behind it where I am asking questions about certain aspects conveniently enough.  The 2nd is CLEARLY written in a joking fashion.  Add to it, you left off the rest of it.  So if you're going to quote, quote the whole thing.  Hense the reason I put the whole posts.

[Yrkoon]

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...


The first comment you are leaving out all the other points behind it where I am asking questions about certain aspects conveniently enough.

No, stop patting yourself on the back.  You didn't make any 'points' in that post.  And  even if you did, it wouldn't matter.   One can make moronic judgements and hurl insults at a huge chunk of the gaming community, then later ask some questons in the same post.  Doesn't erase the judgements and insults they made.  Does it.

 The 2nd is CLEARLY written in a joking fashion. 

 Enough of this incessant backtracking lawyer speak.    You called us slow, and you claimed we were Bad at games... all because we took exactly as long to finish this game as Bioware advertized that we would.

Moreover, I haven't returned the favor.  I've yet to call you a LIAR  (for example).  But I'm getting really close.  Why should anyone believe  that you finished your first playthrough in 30 hours  but still managed to do everything but 4 sidequests... hmm?  have you  posted that screenshot yet?

Modifié par Yrkoon, 04 mars 2010 - 01:50 .

[Myusha]

Stop bickering. No one cares how fast you finished Origins. It's just a damn video game.

[Spendal]

JKJEDIKNIGHT

Do you make love like you play? Just get to the end as quickly as you can?

[JKJEDIKNIGHT]

You can call me w/e you want, it doesn't hurt my feelings, nor do I need to post up any picture to prove anything to you. I did it, and that's that. Don't believe me, ask BIOWARE if it's impossible. If it wasn't, I would think they would call me out on here. But probably not. Either way get over it, so you don't believe me, I get it, and I don't care. If you read any of the posts I put from this thread, it would be obvious to you that I never insulted anyone, and asked questions of where people spent their time and how. But since you insist I insulted you fine, I'll insult you. You're an idiot if you spent more than 40 hours on this game to complete. You should probably just sell it back to Game Stop and give up video games because you're a complete and utter failure. Not only at video games, but also life. I beats this game several times in under 30 hours, and soon I'll have one under 10, and you won't because I'm better than you. I'm in the video game hall of fame, are you? Nope, you're a loser, give up games. I was 7th ranked in the world in a video game once. Have you ever attained such a feat? You should envy me in all my greatness because I'm even better at DA:O than Ferret, or Gabo. Hell, I should have made this game I'm so good. Now that I've completely crushed your ego, your gaming prowess, and your life, please run through 12 lanes of highway traffic blindfolded. Have a nice day :-)

[JKJEDIKNIGHT]

Spendal wrote...

JKJEDIKNIGHT
Do you make love like you play? Just get to the end as quickly as you can?

Not with my wife, but some of those girls way back in my partying days, yep, get in, get out, wash it off :-p

[Yrkoon]

JKJEDIKNIGHT wrote...

You can call me w/e you want, it doesn't hurt my feelings, nor do I need to post up any picture to prove anything to you. I did it, and that's that. Don't believe me, ask BIOWARE if it's impossible. If it wasn't, I would think they would call me out on here. But probably not. Either way get over it, so you don't believe me, I get it, and I don't care. If you read any of the posts I put from this thread, it would be obvious to you that I never insulted anyone, and asked questions of where people spent their time and how. But since you insist I insulted you fine, I'll insult you. You're an idiot if you spent more than 40 hours on this game to complete. You should probably just sell it back to Game Stop and give up video games because you're a complete and utter failure. Not only at video games, but also life. I beats this game several times in under 30 hours, and soon I'll have one under 10, and you won't because I'm better than you. I'm in the video game hall of fame, are you? Nope, you're a loser, give up games. I was 7th ranked in the world in a video game once. Have you ever attained such a feat? You should envy me in all my greatness because I'm even better at DA:O than Ferret, or Gabo. Hell, I should have made this game I'm so good. Now that I've completely crushed your ego, your gaming prowess, and your life, please run through 12 lanes of highway traffic blindfolded. Have a nice day :-)

Yay!  when all else fails, lets go into a frothing frenzy.

Frustrated much?