Scientific inaccuracy
#1
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:38
#2
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:39
#3
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:40
Modifié par Vaenier, 24 février 2010 - 06:41 .
#4
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:41
#5
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:41
The light you are seeing hasn't made it into the black hole yet, but is swirling faster and faster towards its death, brightening as it speeds up.
#6
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:41
#7
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:42
Guest_Aotearas_*
#8
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:45
You've spotted only one?
Modifié par Pannamaslo, 24 février 2010 - 06:46 .
#9
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:45
#10
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:49
#11
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:50
xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he
produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to
believe, that this is some sort of a
magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got
fired for that blunder.
#12
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:51
#13
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:51
Now really, it bothers you that the black hole was portrayed totally incorrectly, but it doesn't bother you that your ship can accelerate to FTL speed.
Right...
#14
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:51
As for how it looks?
www.dailygalaxy.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/17/black_hole_big_2_3.jpg
Looks pretty good to me. *shrugs*
Modifié par aaniadyen, 24 février 2010 - 06:58 .
#15
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:52
i've never been so proud in my entire lifeprocki wrote...
In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a
xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he
produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to
believe, that this is some sort of a
magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got
fired for that blunder.
#16
Posté 24 février 2010 - 06:53
crepeau wrote...
That's light/energy being bent around the black hole. The black hole itself is not emitting light.
This.
#17
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:02
SarEnyaDor wrote...
Actually, the light is brightest at the edge of the black hole before it crosses into the point of no return.
The light you are seeing hasn't made it into the black hole yet, but is swirling faster and faster towards its death, brightening as it speeds up.
this, material becomes superheated the closer it gets to the event horizon. this is partially how we've found black holes in the first place, that and the gamma bursts they emit. and it is def not a neutron star, those are gennerally the size of a large terrestrial planets.
i love space
edit here is a link to a nasa site explaining black hole along with an actual pic of one
http://imagine.gsfc....lack_holes.html
Modifié par Lambu1, 24 février 2010 - 07:08 .
#18
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:04
Modifié par SmokePants, 24 février 2010 - 07:07 .
#19
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:07
#20
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:08
Modifié par Behindyounow, 24 février 2010 - 07:11 .
#21
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:08
#22
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:10
Also, how can you get all bent out of shape about a pretty background when you traveled to the spot to look at it doing a speed many times the speed of light?
So repeat after me "Oooh pretty".
That's all you need to do.
#23
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:18
Also, yes there is a super-massive black hole at the center of the galaxy, but that does not preclude the core from being littered with smaller black holes. The density of material in that region leads to larger stars forming, living for shorter periods of time, and collapsing into black holes. They are too far away to fall into the Supermassive black hole.
Also, black holes do not suck. That new Star Trek movie needs to die for perpetuating that myth.
#24
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:19
www.hulu.com/watch/113965/cosmic-journeys-black-hole-at-the-center-of-the-milky-way-galaxy
#25
Posté 24 février 2010 - 07:32





Retour en haut






