a conversation about kelly.......ewwww
#1
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:43
#2
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:44
#3
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:46
#4
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:46
#5
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:46
#6
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:47
UsedTaco salad wrote...
she is aW -H-o-R-E
that's a bit harsh....even if it might be true.
Besides she's not a w**** they get paid. Kelly's just...ugh.
#7
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:49
#8
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:51
I endorse this comment.Kid_SixXx wrote...
You say this like that is a bad thing. If my girlfriend dressed in that Asari dancer outfit with me not having to ask her, I'd probably offer to wash dishes more often.
#9
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:52
the_one_54321 wrote...
I endorse this comment.Kid_SixXx wrote...
You say this like that is a bad thing. If my girlfriend dressed in that Asari dancer outfit with me not having to ask her, I'd probably offer to wash dishes more often.
Enjoy her oogling guys openly infront of you One.
#10
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:55
Fair is fair.Ryzaki wrote...
Enjoy her oogling guys openly infront of you One.the_one_54321 wrote...
I endorse this comment.Kid_SixXx wrote...
You say this like that is a bad thing. If my girlfriend dressed in that Asari dancer outfit with me not having to ask her, I'd probably offer to wash dishes more often.
#11
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:04
Guest_XxTaLoNxX_*
#12
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:11
[quote]the_one_54321 wrote...
[quote]Kid_SixXx wrote...
You say this like that is a bad thing. If my girlfriend dressed in that Asari dancer outfit with me not having to ask her, I'd probably offer to wash dishes more often.[/quote]
I endorse this comment.
[/quote]
As do I. Kelly is very work hard/play hard. I appreciate that.
[quote] Enjoy her oogling guys openly infront of you One.
[/quote]
That's fine. I have no problem with my significant other looking. Beauty is beauty. Why she should she pretend like it isn't there? It's all a matter of context and knowing what you have.
Kelly was my favorite. If she was actually capable of being a LI in ME3, that's who I would take forward.
#13
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:14
One would hope most would know the difference.
#14
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:18
#15
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:21
Lover and significant other are not always quite the same thing.Ryzaki wrote...
^there's a difference in finding someone attractive and saying that you would screw them if given the chance in front of your lover.
One would hope most would know the difference.
#16
Guest_randumb vanguard_*
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:22
Guest_randumb vanguard_*
(putting up flame shield)
HA! take that earth clan I have a shield
#17
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:23
the_one_54321 wrote...
Lover and significant other are not always quite the same thing.Ryzaki wrote...
^there's a difference in finding someone attractive and saying that you would screw them if given the chance in front of your lover.
One would hope most would know the difference.
Fine Significant other then.
You know what I meant damn you!
Doesn't help that to me lover = someone you're in love with.
Otherwise they're friends with benefits or a f***buddy. You don't call them your lover unless "love" is involved.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 25 février 2010 - 05:24 .
#18
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:23
Well then tact and monogomy FTW.Ryzaki wrote...
Fine Significant other then.the_one_54321 wrote...
Lover and significant other are not always quite the same thing.Ryzaki wrote...
^there's a difference in finding someone attractive and saying that you would screw them if given the chance in front of your lover.
One would hope most would know the difference.
You know what I meant damn you!
#19
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:24
the_one_54321 wrote...
Well then tact and monogomy FTW.Ryzaki wrote...
Fine Significant other then.the_one_54321 wrote...
Lover and significant other are not always quite the same thing.Ryzaki wrote...
^there's a difference in finding someone attractive and saying that you would screw them if given the chance in front of your lover.
One would hope most would know the difference.
You know what I meant damn you!
That's it you filthy cheater!!! I'm throwing you out of the airlock!
#20
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:25
Monogomy! I said monogomy!Ryzaki wrote...
That's it you filthy cheater!!! I'm throwing you out of the airlock!the_one_54321 wrote...
Well then tact and monogomy FTW.Ryzaki wrote...
Fine Significant other then.the_one_54321 wrote...
Lover and significant other are not always quite the same thing.Ryzaki wrote...
^there's a difference in finding someone attractive and saying that you would screw them if given the chance in front of your lover.
One would hope most would know the difference.
You know what I meant damn you!
#21
Posté 25 février 2010 - 05:27
the_one_54321 wrote...
Monogomy! I said monogomy!Ryzaki wrote...
That's it you filthy cheater!!! I'm throwing you out of the airlock!the_one_54321 wrote...
Well then tact and monogomy FTW.Ryzaki wrote...
Fine Significant other then.the_one_54321 wrote...
Lover and significant other are not always quite the same thing.Ryzaki wrote...
^there's a difference in finding someone attractive and saying that you would screw them if given the chance in front of your lover.
One would hope most would know the difference.
You know what I meant damn you!
Doesn't matter! I don't want you anymore!
#22
Posté 27 février 2010 - 12:00
XxTaLoNxX wrote...
I agree... Kelly is... gross. I can't help but not have that as the ONLY LI option to not get played in my playthroughs.
Thank You TaLoN;)
#23
Posté 27 février 2010 - 12:00
XxTaLoNxX wrote...
I agree... Kelly is... gross. I can't help but not have that as the ONLY LI option to not get played in my playthroughs.
Thank You TaLoN;)
#24
Posté 27 février 2010 - 12:00
XxTaLoNxX wrote...
I agree... Kelly is... gross. I can't help but not have that as the ONLY LI option to not get played in my playthroughs.
Thank You TaLoN;)
#25
Posté 27 février 2010 - 12:37
Idiots.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






