Is Cerberus really Evil?
#301
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 12:28
#302
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 12:31
#303
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 12:34
In the Council's xeno-nationalist galaxy, race identification is a political unit. Not base racism.Wolfy2449 wrote...
cerberus isnt evil, just racist and power hungry. they only care about humans
#304
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 12:43
Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams wrote...
The ends justify the means. You're right, the Geth have never attacked humanity, and they have given every intention that they just want peace with us (/sarcasm). Also, insinuating that the crime was worse because David was autistic is sort of a messed up way to look at it. In my mind it would be no different if the unwilling victim was not impaired in any way.
So... if the geth were defeated by wiping out the entire galaxy, literally, including humanity and everyone else in it, it would be justified simply because the Geth were defeated?
"The end justifies the means" is a platitude used to excuse not worrying about the consequences of the means. It is only true where the means actually bring about the end, where there isn't a better path even if they do, and where the means are not in and of themselves as bad or worse than the end.
Your sarcasm does not change the fact that it was only a faction of the Geth that weren't peaceful, and they were aided by Saren and Sovereign, and even then, they were defeated without anything like overlord.
#305
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 01:44
Knowledge of the Geth/Heretic split does not exist before Shepard's finding and reactivation of Legion. Overlord began and entered its crisis well before then.
#306
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 02:02
#307
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 02:03
Corporal Toombs obviously suffered but how much of the given situation could he possibly know? How much of the 'information' he supplies can be completely factual? If someone injects something into you that causes pain, obviously one would think it's what's been injected... what if it's the reaction of whatever is in his bloodstream to counter-act it? What if... Cerberus was actually trying to make him lucid so they can find out what exactly happened? Isn't that as plausible to the alternative?
Sending a rapid reaction force to a potential hotspot isn't an 'evil' thing to do either, that's what the marines are there for.
#308
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 02:05
Arijharn wrote...
You know; in and of itself I don't see what's deplorable about sending marines to Akuze in the first place. People's entire perception of that event is wrapped up in the testimony of Corporal Toombs so the idea that anyone takes his word as absolute gospel is absolutely ridiculous.
Corporal Toombs obviously suffered but how much of the given situation could he possibly know? How much of the 'information' he supplies can be completely factual? If someone injects something into you that causes pain, obviously one would think it's what's been injected... what if it's the reaction of whatever is in his bloodstream to counter-act it? What if... Cerberus was actually trying to make him lucid so they can find out what exactly happened? Isn't that as plausible to the alternative?
Sending a rapid reaction force to a potential hotspot isn't an 'evil' thing to do either, that's what the marines are there for.
If you're suggesting that Cerberus wasn't responsible for the Akuze disaster, I'm afraid it's already been confirmed that they were behind it.
#309
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 02:06
#310
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 02:11
Repulsive? No. Justified? Well, you've already staked a position and placed one above the many, so that wouldn't change for you either.SFF19 wrote...
I fail to see how that makes what Doc Archer did with the project any less repulsive. :/
The sad thing is, taking Archer's brother out of the system doesn't mean that the project will be shut down and no more harm will be done. It really just means that Cerberus will go find more autistics and put them into the system until they find someone who gets anything close to suitable results. A lot more boys and girls, and not even for as much gain should war with the geth come (as it likely will, for all Shepards but the most procrastinating and who learn otherwise from Legion).
#311
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 04:24
#312
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 04:27
Repulsive? No. Justified? Well, you've already staked a position and placed one above the many, so that wouldn't change for you either.
Following the standard timeline in which Legion come before Overlord, it wouldn't be placing the one above the many because the many aren't in appreciable danger from the geth. You also define it much too starkly: it's the one definite over the many maybe.
#313
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 04:50
If Cerberus seeks out a solution to the cost of one persons suffering against the cost of all those lives, which is probably in the high hundreds, plus how ever many hundreds if not thousands more could potentially be lost in a war against the Geth, then I say more power to them. It's a justified use of human resources. Ethical? Certainly not. Moral? If you bend them like a pro-yoga person. Humane? Not a chance. Justified? Absolutely, without a doubt.
#314
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 04:51
In the end I think it's as they say, they're not as bad as everyone says... but not saints either.
#315
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 04:54
Even the Eclipse Mercs liberated a planet (read in its desrciption)
That being said I would prefer to work with the STG than either Cerberus, the Alliance, or the council.
That may just be because they have Kirrahe and Mordin. And having just done Virmire again:
“You all know the mission, and what is at stake.
I have come to trust each of you with my life -- but I have also heard murmurs of discontent. I share your concerns.
We are trained for espionage; we would be legends, but the records are sealed. Glory in battle is not our way.
Think of our heroes; the Silent Step, who defeated a nation with a single shot. Or the Ever Alert, who kept armies at bay with hidden facts.
These giants do not seem to give us solace here, but they are not all that we are.
Before the network, there was the fleet. Before diplomacy, there were soldiers!
Our influence stopped the rachni, but before that we held the line!
Our influence stopped the krogan, but before that, we held the line!
Our influence will stop Saren; in the battle today, we will hold the line!”
Simply epic.
#316
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 04:55
Considering the not-very-considerable threat the geth actually possess, it's not actually justified. Maybe it's justifiable, which is quite a big maybe, but it was objectively an evil waste.Reaper S1x wrote...
At least they were being proactive and seeking a solution to the problem before a full scale war broke out. Depending on if you went renegade or paragon, Humanity has already lost one colony, and 5 Cruisers to the Geth.
If Cerberus seeks out a solution to the cost of one persons suffering against the cost of all those lives, which is probably in the high hundreds, plus how ever many hundreds if not thousands more could potentially be lost in a war against the Geth, then I say more power to them. It's a justified use of human resources. Ethical? Certainly not. Moral? If you bend them like a pro-yoga person. Humane? Not a chance. Justified? Absolutely, without a doubt.
#317
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 04:58
Try talking to larger and larger groups too see if it works.
Dont toss somebody into the proverbial deep end their maybe second time out.
That moment made me want to kneecap Archer right there.
#318
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:03
#319
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:05
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Repulsive? No. Justified? Well, you've already staked a position and placed one above the many, so that wouldn't change for you either.SFF19 wrote...
I fail to see how that makes what Doc Archer did with the project any less repulsive. :/
The sad thing is, taking Archer's brother out of the system doesn't mean that the project will be shut down and no more harm will be done. It really just means that Cerberus will go find more autistics and put them into the system until they find someone who gets anything close to suitable results. A lot more boys and girls, and not even for as much gain should war with the geth come (as it likely will, for all Shepards but the most procrastinating and who learn otherwise from Legion).
Patently untrue, TIM's email states they'll likely NEVER find anyone like David again. So the project likely can't be restarted, at least not anytime soon, or in time to have any tangible effect.
#320
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:06
Why he didnt say: "hey look it works!", instead of well doing what he did.Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
Yeah that was Archer's fault and can't be blamed on Cerberus, Cerberus was going to pull the plug on it.
That was one of the stupider things an person does in ME2. Outside of trying to have snu snu with Morinth.
#321
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:11
#322
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:21
Stealing Normandy's design: Benificial
EDI development from Reaper AI technology: Benificial
Resurrection of Shepard: Benificial - until a security flaw caused the base to be destroyed.
#323
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:29
TIM handpicks his operatives and likes to keep personal control over all Cerberus projects. Maybe he didn't order David to be plugged into the VI, but he should have had more info on the situation than "Shepard, we've lost contact with this project, go investigate it." At the very least, he should have known enough about what was going on there to know that bringing an AI like EDI within range of the base would be a very, very bad idea.Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
Yeah that was Archer's fault and can't be blamed on Cerberus, Cerberus was going to pull the plug on it.
Besides, TIM gets mad if you take David away, complaining about the missed opportunity. For someone who was going to shut the project down beforehand, he sure changed his mind quickly.
#324
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:50
#325
Posté 27 novembre 2010 - 05:56





Retour en haut




