Jack doesn't really have a choice because she is crazy in the head. I know it's a common copout but in this case I think she has reason. Thane....he has a choice and knows it.Markinator_123 wrote...
Darht Jayder wrote...
Well Jack kind of has that excuse too. She was abused and conditioned for it at childhood also. So we are back to Morinth I guess.The Angry One wrote...
Darht Jayder wrote...
How about Thane? He justifies his serial killing by hiding behind religious dogma and claiming he is not in control of his body. Total crock and puts him at the top of the list too.
Thane is somewhat mitigated by the fact that he was conditioned to do this since he was 6 years old.
It does make the Hanar look like gigantic douchebags though.
Evil is evil regardless of someone's tragic backstory especially considering that they have a choice- They are not robots
Who do you believe was the most evil team mate in ME2?
#51
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:13
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
#52
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:13
#53
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:14
#54
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:15
2. zaeed
3.grunt
#55
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:15
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
Murder is still murder and evil nontheless. Just cause someone else tells you to do it doesn't make it less so.The Angry One wrote...
Assassins aren't inherently evil. They don't murder for self-gratification or because the voices in their heads tell them to. Someone like Thane seems to stick to people that need-a-killin anyway, I wanted Dantius to drop dead since ME1.
Jack is psychotic but doesn't appear to harm people who don't intend her harm first.
Morinth on the other hand is a rapist and murderer, Samara is a murderer who justifies her attacks with a self-imposed and highly hypocritical code (re: attacking Nihlus with no context for what he was doing) and Zaeed is just an evil idiot.
#56
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:16
The Angry One wrote...
Assassins aren't inherently evil. They don't murder for self-gratification or because the voices in their heads tell them to. Someone like Thane seems to stick to people that need-a-killin anyway, I wanted Dantius to drop dead since ME1.
Jack is psychotic but doesn't appear to harm people who don't intend her harm first.
Morinth on the other hand is a rapist and murderer, Samara is a murderer who justifies her attacks with a self-imposed and highly hypocritical code (re: attacking Nihlus with no context for what he was doing) and Zaeed is just an evil idiot.
Very good point about Samara
#57
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:16
#58
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:16
#59
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:17
Crowwalker100 wrote...
Zaeed, he was will to let a whole plant full of workers die just for his revenge..
Except killing Vido saves a lot more people in the long run. And this might be the only chance you have to get him.
#60
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:17
#61
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:19
godwin's lawThe Angry One wrote...
The evil of murder is relative. For example, how evil would it have been to shoot Hitler in the head?
#62
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:19
Skilled Seeker wrote...
Crowwalker100 wrote...
Zaeed, he was will to let a whole plant full of workers die just for his revenge..
Except killing Vido saves a lot more people in the long run. And this might be the only chance you have to get him.
I'd agree, except for the fact that Zaeed created the situation where you had to choose between the workers and Vido in the first place.
If Zaeed hadn't started the fire, he would've gotten Vido and the workers would've been safe. Instead he chose to be an ass - even renegade Shep will yell at him for starting the fire.
That's what makes him evil. *He* put the workers in danger and refused to take responsibility for it in the name of revenge.
#63
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:20
Collider wrote...
godwin's lawThe Angry One wrote...
The evil of murder is relative. For example, how evil would it have been to shoot Hitler in the head?
Don't mess with me Godwin or I'll pay Thane to kill you!
#64
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:20
Actually in a sense we are something like organic robots. To use the "you always have a choice" cop-out is to be voluntarily ignorant of the effects of learning and conditioning, and the real, physical effect that they have on our brains. Will conditioning always be 100% effective? No, but it is equally impossible to think that everyone is capable of overcoming the effects of it. Jack is simply one of the people who couldn't. It isn't her fault, it is the fault of the people who "programmed" her.Markinator_123 wrote...
Evil is evil regardless of someone's tragic backstory especially considering that they have a choice- They are not robots
#65
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:20
The Angry One wrote...
Mordin's only crime is being a realist, the Krogan are too damn stupid to function effectively as a space-faring species, Mordin simply did what was needed to keep them alive.
If they cured the genophage and started pulling off another Krogan rebellion, the Council's response would be unilateral.
Mordin's real crime was that he didn't even give the krogan a chance. All he had were simulations suggesting what would likely happen. Who knows what would have really happened? He could have at the very least just held the new genophage he created without deploying it for a while. See how things were really unfolding before acting.
#66
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:20
Guest_Darht Jayder_*
You could practically argue that it was in self defence so not the same.The Angry One wrote...
The evil of murder is relative. For example, how evil would it have been to shoot Hitler in the head?
#67
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:23
#68
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:23
Skilled Seeker wrote...
Crowwalker100 wrote...
Zaeed, he was will to let a whole plant full of workers die just for his revenge..
Except killing Vido saves a lot more people in the long run. And this might be the only chance you have to get him.
Not really, someone will just take Vido's place. The boss dieing doesn't end a organization.
#69
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:26
Svest wrote...
Mordin's real crime was that he didn't even give the krogan a chance. All he had were simulations suggesting what would likely happen. Who knows what would have really happened? He could have at the very least just held the new genophage he created without deploying it for a while. See how things were really unfolding before acting.
Every single Krogan is unapologetic about the rebellions, or nuking themselves.
They remind me of those pig dudes from Star Control 2, the ones who killed their own civilisation 24 times through nuclear war and were proud of it. Krogan are just like that, belligerent and stupid.
If Mordin hadn't done what he did the Krogan would be dead right now.
#70
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:26
Karl45 wrote...
Skilled Seeker wrote...
Crowwalker100 wrote...
Zaeed, he was will to let a whole plant full of workers die just for his revenge..
Except killing Vido saves a lot more people in the long run. And this might be the only chance you have to get him.
Not really, someone will just take Vido's place. The boss dieing doesn't end a organization.
So then why does everyone seem to agree that killing Balak is the 'right' choice in BDTS when he will just be replaced by another batarian terrorist.
#71
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:27
I don't think it is a particularly good point.Markinator_123 wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
Samara is a murderer who justifies her attacks with a self-imposed and highly hypocritical code (re: attacking Nihlus with no context for what he was doing) and Zaeed is just an evil idiot.
Very good point about Samara
Samara's code is not hypocritical, it is simply black-and-white. It doesn't exist to "do good", because "good" is a highly grey concept. As Samara states directly, the code exists to protect the innocent and punish the wicked. Whatever Nihilus was trying to accomplish doesn't matter at all in the context of the code -- the fact is that he attacked and killed an unarmed civilian. By the code's definition, this makes him a wicked person, and it was Samara's duty to punish him for that.
Think of a police officer. If he saw someone pull out a gun and start shooting at unarmed people, you had better believe that he would try and shoot him. It doesn't matter what he may or may not have been trying to do. Does that make the officer a hypocrite? Does that make him evil?
Modifié par Pauravi, 25 février 2010 - 11:28 .
#72
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:27
Modifié par Relinquished2, 25 février 2010 - 11:28 .
#73
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:28
Modifié par Tooneyman, 25 février 2010 - 11:29 .
#74
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:30
Tooneyman wrote...
Grunt " Good crew if they stay out of my way, Dead crew if they get in my way.!" enough said!
Grunt just talks big he never does anything bad.
#75
Posté 25 février 2010 - 11:30
Pauravi wrote...
Samara's code is not hypocritical, it is simply black-and-white. It doesn't exist to "do good", because "good" is a highly grey concept. As Samara states directly, the code exists to protect the innocent and punish the wicked. Whatever Nihilus was trying to accomplish doesn't matter at all in the context of the code -- the fact is that he attacked and killed an unarmed civilian. By the code's definition, this makes him a wicked person, and it was Samara's duty to punish him for that.
Think of a police officer. If he saw someone pull out a gun and start shooting at unarmed people, you had better believe that he would try and shoot him. It doesn't matter what he may or may not have been trying to do. Does that make the officer a hypocrite? Does that make him evil?
Irrelevant. Samara isn't a police officer. She has no jurisdiction. Hell, the very first scene she appears in she's attacking and throwing around someone like a ragdoll, then snaps her neck.
By her own "code" she is evil and must be punished. And it's not only that. Her code obligates her to massacre a police station for holding her for COMMITING A CRIME? Why? That's utterly sociopathic.





Retour en haut






