hwman wrote...
Add me to the list of people who are happy there is not an option for same-sex romances in mass effect. Most people are heterosexual. Why does everyone have to have the option of being gay?
Why does everyone have to be straight? Or Alliance, for that matter? Most people in the world aren't members of the military.
One of the enjoyable aspects of videogames is that it's 'come as you aren't.' I don't have to be a man to enjoy playing a male character, and I don't have to be gay to enjoy playing a character that has the possibility of same-sex romance. I also don't have to be gay to recognize that people who are would like to see something of themselves reflected in the game, to be treated on par with straight people, and to not be invisible. In a world where xenophilic relationships are an
option - with Liara, Tali, and Garrus - that doesn't seem particularly out of line.
The whole idea behind having options for shepherd in a 3rd person narrative is that all of your possible actions
/ dialog fits into possible things shepherd would choose from. I don't want there to be options in all the dialog where I can hit on same-sex crew mates because shepherd is not homosexual.
Why not? Just because the option is there doesn't mean you have to choose it. Like Paragon/Renegade - if I play Paragon and don't like Renegade, I just don't choose the Renegade option. Why should it be invisible just because I don't like it? Other people do and would like to choose it; it's nothing to me if they want to play the game in a way that I don't. It's not like any of us are playing it wrong or anything.
Yes, Bioware does a good job of advancing modern social causes in their games and I am not opposed to them having gay characters, but they don't need to make it so that everyone can be gay.
No one's particularly arguing for that, though several people (like myself) have wondered why exactly that would be so problematic. I find it hard to believe that half your potential crew is willing to sleep with you at all, much less that almost every possible relationship would be based on a conventionally straight sexual orientation. Still, what most people are asking for is equal representation for m/m, and some well-written romance in general, with at least one option for everyone.
Though I'm not quite sure how you're not opposed to them having gay characters, when you've said that you don't want Shep to be gay. By which I assume you mean MShep - FemShep's sapphic romances seem to slip below the radar. You've also said you don't want characters that are labeled by their sexuality - but how would that be different for gay characters when it'd likely be implemented the same as with the straight ones? You'd get to hear their backstory, and the only difference is that (for example) instead of having a wife or girlfriend, a male character might mention a boyfriend or husband instead. Mentioning a context that highlights their sexuality is not 'labeling' any more with gay people than it is with straight ones; if you're going to object to one, it's only fair you object to all of them.
Modifié par Temper_Graniteskul, 31 mars 2010 - 06:26 .