annihilator27 wrote...
http://kotaku.com/55...n-mass-effect-2
From Ray Muzyka: "Sometimes, in some of our games, we are going to have a defined
character with a more defined view. Almost like a third-person
narrative — where Mass Effect is more in that vein, Dragon Age isn't in
that vein; you could see the differences between the two. It's just
part of the design and the choices made for each game. It doesn't mean
that we've in anyway changed our philosophy toward enabling choice. We
love giving players choice, and we are going to continue to enable that
for future games. That's a commitment for some of our franchises. For
some other franchises we've had more defined characters and sort of
approaches to things, and they've had a more defined personality and a
more defined approach to the way they've proceed through the game and
the world."
Commander Shepard is more 'pre-defined'? What game have I been playing? This is absolute nonsense, and if this IS their reasoning, that goes against them recording same-sex dialog in ME1 and other things I've read. They really should have just remained silent on the issue, rather than state that of all the things they could 'pre-define' about the Commander Shepard character, namely gender, ethnicity, faith, combat specialization, place of origin, morality, etc., they only chose to limit his/her sexuality. Or rather,
his. And the smokescreen about 'developing additional content' is bogus as well. Boy, does Fox News have them running scared.