jlb524 wrote...
I am too. It seems like we could create hundreds of these threads (hell, we have) and everyone and their mother can post in them showing support for same-sex romances. The devs will read them and see the support and maybe even try to get them implemented in ME3, but ultimately their hands are tied by the suits. If they want the game to be 'mainstream' and only show 'PG-13 sexual situations' just to rake in the cash, well, that's how it's going to be and mature and positive depictions of homsexual content will be cut.
I knew there was a reason I hated when my games went Mainstream. I hope Atlus doesn't start ruining my Persona. It wouldn't be the same without the occult symbols and suggestive behavior.

Now I see why people get irritated when something non-mainstream becomes popular. I can finally feel their pain. Its not so much the fact that it
is popular as the fact that what happens to the original product in the attempt to
stay popular.

This still doesn't prevent them from using and maybe even exploiting homosexual situations in game, as they did in ME2. There are three cases of human homosexual behavior displayed in ME2...all female/female of course:
1) Jack. I'll explain this one a bit. She flat out tells you she's had sex with women. Is this because she's seriously attracted to women or values their companionship in a mature relationship? No! It's b/c she's one of those troubled, crazy straight chicks who have sex with women to please other men or for the hell of it b/c she's such a 'free-spirit'. Yes, we get it, Jack's a loose canon...she like vandalized moons and blew up stuff. Did you have to add sex with women into her backstory and trivialize those relationships?
2) Nef. I don't have to say anything here.
3) Kelly Chambers. I don't have to say anything here.
Yeah that...seriously irritated me too. I mean if there's not going to be anything positive just leave it out all together please. It would be like if the only black character was a thieving, slaving, rapist and all around vile scumbag. That's not good.
Also I finally have a Shephard is predefined character poll. Let's see the results.
http://social.biowar...94/polls/4296/ 75% of the vote thinks he's not predefined.
And 25% do.
Okay I'm sorryy but I'm sick and tired of the Asari aren't females argument. Can someone please quote this in the FAQ:
There is some conflicting information regarding the gender of the asari. Though they resemble females, at least to humans, asari are non-gender specific, with no concept of gender differences. Liara says her species is "mono-gendered—male and female have no real meaning for us,"and, if asked, says that she is "not precisely a woman".
However,in the [/u]Codex it is stated that the asari are an all-female race. The Galactic
Codex: Essentials Edition 2183 says that "while asari have only one gender, they are not
asexual like single-celled life—all asari are sexually female", and according to Liara they also have maternal instincts. They are innately different from humans for asari can crossbreed with other
species and inherit certain traits.
Mono-gendered: Means one gender. Not none.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 06 avril 2010 - 04:26 .