I was asked to cross-post this from the "Bioware, you have some explaining to do" thread, so here it is. At least, I -think- this is what I was asked to cross-post, and where I was asked to cross post it. He was a bit vague, and I'd done several posts in the past few minuites. <.<
Ah well. It's relevant either way. ;p
(nameremoved) wrote...
I like the characters the way they are. There doesn't have to be a token gay person just like there doesn't have to be a person of every race on the Normandy.
I'm going to assume that you're a white straight male.
We live in a time of relatively -incredible- tolerance (in the western world, anyway) where for the most part, gays are allowed to live their lives and be part of society relatively unmolested by homophobes and violent bigots.
60 years ago, you could be beaten to death for being gay, and the police would probably ignore it.
20 years ago, you could still get your butt kicked. Things today are much, much better, but there is still a practice in hollywood and the game industry of deliberate exclusion. Gays make up a small percentage of the population, yes, but there are over 20 people on the Normandy. Statistically, at least a couple of them should be gay. Others might be open minded. That's not tokenism, that's -representation-.
It's also an established fact that Shep is the almighty badass of the universe. It's not hard to imagine some open minded people being cool with bending their orientation around such a special case. ;p
Going back to my assumption about your race/gender/prefference:
If the Normandy had a crew that was 70% female, would that seem odd to you? What if everyone was black? Would you feel excluded, as a white person, from a future where, with no apparent explanation, no one like you seems to be around? Gay/Lesbian/straight gamers feel excluded from ME2. There's nothing wrong with asking to be -included-. None of us have gone around making unreasonable demands. My only complaint, really, is with Bioware's obvious PR spin answers to the question.
Why is it that Female Shepard's sexuality is absolutely allowed to be flexed, (regardless of the status of asari gender, they look female, sound female, act female, and have female parts, and only a lesbian shepard would be attracted to Liara) While male shepard's is "a fixed aspect of the character"? Muzyka's answers are obvious PR spin for "we excluded gay males because we don't want to drive away our mainstream market". In fact, once upon a time, that was what they actually -said-, and I was fine with that. I find the BS excuses to be patronizing. It irritates me.