lastpatriot wrote...
Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Oh.
lastpatriot wrote...
Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
lastpatriot wrote...
Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 14 avril 2010 - 03:42 .
LiquidGrape wrote...
lastpatriot wrote...
Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Temper_Graniteskul wrote...
Not quite seeing how gay LI options would "destroy the core values of the character" Shep is, though. Especially since (as had been repeatedly stated) no one would be forced to play them through, and lesbian/bisexual Shepard already exists. I hadn't noticed my space marine become less competent at their job because of someone else's Liara/FemShep romance. Apparently you didn't notice it, either.lastpatriot wrote...
Wow... that's just so sick! AAGGGH, my eyes are burning!LiquidGrape wrote...
lastpatriot wrote...
Shepard is supposed to be the iconic hero and dedicated soldier. To allow for same-sex romance would destory the core values of the character he/she was created to be.
Were Bioware to change this aspect of the game for ME3, I for one would not buy it out of principal.
Actually, I played my FemShep pretty much based on how I would actually act in the situations we're faced with in the game (yeah... I'm an RPG fan to the core). With that being the case, I had no idea there were lesbian options unti I saw some of the threads on this site.
So what was the problem, again?
Modifié par Siansonea II, 14 avril 2010 - 04:07 .
Siansonea II wrote...
Seriously, if humanity is still homophobic and intolerant in 2185, I think I'm going to side with the Reapers in ME3.
Seriously? So, you meant "my values" when you said "core values," then. To which there is only one answer, and it lies in the lack of a canon Shepard that's based solely on your personal values. My Shep isn't your Shep, and s/he doesn't have to be. Paragon Shep does not violate Renegade Shep, gay Shep doesn't affect straight Shep.lastpatriot wrote...
Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
Modifié par Temper_Graniteskul, 14 avril 2010 - 03:56 .
lastpatriot wrote...
You people have no sense of humor......
Mordigan wrote...
OMG, this thread is still on the first page?!?
Well I'll say one thing. You "queer pushers" get an A for effort in the persistence category. Too bad it will all be for naught..
MaleShep will never be gay, because he's the James Bond of the Mass Effect Universe (as described by his creators). It's against Bioware's interest to make him gay, as it would ruin his character appeal and integrity; especially if they want to eventually go the franchise route with Mass Effect.
Only FemShep can be gay/bisexual, and thats because she isn't considered canon the way MaleShep is.
So a gay man can't be an iconic hero or a dedicated soldier. I'll be sure to pass that on to all the dedicated soldiers who are gay (and firefighters and cops and every other gay man or woman who willingly puts their lives on the line for other people). Because, you know, if you're attracted to your own sex, then you can't have any values.lastpatriot wrote...
Shepard is supposed to be the iconic hero and dedicated soldier. To allow for same-sex romance would destory the core values of the character he/she was created to be.
What's driving me nuts here is that by cutting the same-sex material that was already completed, Bioware is capitulating to bigotry.Were Bioware to change this aspect of the game for ME3, I for one would not buy it out of principal.
Mordigan wrote...
OMG, this thread is still on the first page?!?
Well I'll say one thing. You "queer pushers" get an A for effort in the persistence category. Too bad it will all be for naught..
MaleShep will never be gay, because he's the James Bond of the Mass Effect Universe (as described by his creators). It's against Bioware's interest to make him gay, as it would ruin his character appeal and integrity; especially if they want to eventually go the franchise route with Mass Effect.
Only FemShep can be gay/bisexual, and thats because she isn't considered canon the way MaleShep is.
Siansonea II wrote...
Mordigan wrote...
OMG, this thread is still on the first page?!?
Well I'll say one thing. You "queer pushers" get an A for effort in the persistence category. Too bad it will all be for naught..
MaleShep will never be gay, because he's the James Bond of the Mass Effect Universe (as described by his creators). It's against Bioware's interest to make him gay, as it would ruin his character appeal and integrity; especially if they want to eventually go the franchise route with Mass Effect.
Only FemShep can be gay/bisexual, and thats because she isn't considered canon the way MaleShep is.
Your viewpoint seems to be the prevailing one at Bioware, so congratulations on your victory. With an attitude like this, you might be able to get a job as Ray Muzyka's assistant. You could help him write press releases.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 14 avril 2010 - 04:45 .
Ryzaki wrote...
Siansonea II wrote...
Mordigan wrote...
OMG, this thread is still on the first page?!?
Well I'll say one thing. You "queer pushers" get an A for effort in the persistence category. Too bad it will all be for naught..
MaleShep will never be gay, because he's the James Bond of the Mass Effect Universe (as described by his creators). It's against Bioware's interest to make him gay, as it would ruin his character appeal and integrity; especially if they want to eventually go the franchise route with Mass Effect.
Only FemShep can be gay/bisexual, and thats because she isn't considered canon the way MaleShep is.
Your viewpoint seems to be the prevailing one at Bioware, so congratulations on your victory. With an attitude like this, you might be able to get a job as Ray Muzyka's assistant. You could help him write press releases.
That's a little harsh don't you think Siansonea. We don't know Muzyka was against it.
I mean as bad as his copout answers are he obviously didn't think about it too much so I'd peg him more "whatever" than for or against.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 14 avril 2010 - 04:50 .
Indeed. I'm kind of sick of the assertion that the almighty peen makes for a single canon character, also. How is MShep 'canon' when he can make so many different choices and be so many different kinds of person? There's a default Shep, maybe even a 'canon' Shep for marketing purposes, but that's sure not who I'm playing. If nothing else, he keeps letting Ashley get Virmired, and I know that runs contrary to the default in ME2.Ryzaki wrote...
<_<
I'm getting sick of the FemShep isn't canon BS.
Modifié par Temper_Graniteskul, 14 avril 2010 - 05:01 .
Ryzaki wrote...
LiquidGrape wrote...
Why is it in the scifi section? Shouldn't it be in either historical fiction or fantasy?
Modifié par DigMatt, 14 avril 2010 - 05:30 .
Ryzaki wrote...
I actually feel kind of bad if Muzyka was neutral. Poor guy is probably like "I had a feeling something like this was going to happen and now I'm in the spotlight."
Add to the fact that a lot of the interviews are getting picked apart and contradict each other and he's probably all. "...why me?"
Ryzaki wrote...
I'm getting sick of the FemShep isn't canon BS.
That's like saying, why was the concept art for Subject Zero having pink hair ever created in the first place? Creative works like games have basically everything going through phases of development. The first concept of a character may be very different from the end result. The third concept of a character may be very different from the end result.Siansonea II wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
I actually feel kind of bad if Muzyka was neutral. Poor guy is probably like "I had a feeling something like this was going to happen and now I'm in the spotlight."
Add to the fact that a lot of the interviews are getting picked apart and contradict each other and he's probably all. "...why me?"
Isn't Muzyka the CEO? The buck stops there, as far as I'm concerned. If the decision to omit the content was made by someone on the creative team, why was the content developed in the first place?
Collider wrote...
That's like saying, why was the concept art for Subject Zero having pink hair ever created in the first place? Creative works like games have basically everything going through phases of development. The first concept of a character may be very different from the end result. The third concept of a character may be very different from the end result.Siansonea II wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
I actually feel kind of bad if Muzyka was neutral. Poor guy is probably like "I had a feeling something like this was going to happen and now I'm in the spotlight."
Add to the fact that a lot of the interviews are getting picked apart and contradict each other and he's probably all. "...why me?"
Isn't Muzyka the CEO? The buck stops there, as far as I'm concerned. If the decision to omit the content was made by someone on the creative team, why was the content developed in the first place?
Siansonea II wrote...
We're not talking about concept art here, we're talking fully produced content. Your analogy is not applicable.