Nordic Einar wrote...
I'm not insulted, nor am I seeing an insult. Take a few deep breathes - there's this thing used to point out incosistencies called satire? It doesn't necessarily imply malice.
Changing Tali or Garrus (aliens) to suddenly want to be romantically involved (heterosexually, of course) with their human commander is less freaking likely than a previous straight-seeming character coming out of the closet. Seriously - xenophilia requires way more of a stretch than someone being less straight than you thought they were. I am living proof of that fact, and you don't get to just hand wave me away because you don't like it.
People who appear straight are sometimes bi. Get over yourself - this happens in real life, and it's probably way more common than an alien wanting to have sexual relations with their heterosexual human counterpart.
I'm not sure why this is so hard for people like yourself or Collider to accept when it happens all the time in real life.
I would like to apologize here. I was starting to get defensive, and I took your post the wrong way. That being said, I would like to address your post above.
First, I have never attempted to "hand wave you away because I don't like it." I realize that there are lots and lots of people in real life who, for various reasons, live as a heterosexual when they feel differently. I also believe, however, that Mass Effect isn't real life. Characters in any kind of work of fiction
must be more clearly defined and
limited in many ways, so the audience can understand them. Authors
cannot make characters in a story as complex as real people, because there's too much. There would be no way to be able to explain the character. Even in real life, when we talk about people, we "limit" how we define them, so as to more easily explain what we're talking about. Because of this "limiting" of characters in a narrative, it really is "what you see is what you got" most of the time. Sometimes, in novels or series of books, a revelation about a certain character happens towards the end, and
sometimes it works, because it "fits." It was either hinted at during earlier parts of the story (even if you didn't know what the hints were
about, once the "secret" was revealed you can go back and say "OH! THAT's what that meant."), or it just makes sense from how the author has portrayed the character throughout the story. MOST of the time, however, when I see some big "secret" being revealed about a character, I cringe, because it's usually a lame, deus ex machina type of thing. It's a "rewrite" of the character at the end of the story by the author, to get something in the story to work out how he wanted. It's bad writing, and I
hate that type of writing.
In Mass Effect, both 1 and 2, we have characters who have not expressed interest in same sex relationships. Rightly or wrongly, this is an indisputable fact. For two "books" of the trilogy, the characters have been written as heterosexual, outwardly at least. Taking what I just wrote above, having certain characters show interest in same sex relationships in Mass Effect 3 is that "big revelation," and I've rarely seen that "big revelation" done well. I honestly don't trust Bioware to do this well, and so I'd prefer they not try it at all. Give us new characters who are bisexual/homosexual. PLEASE give us that, because the MEverse is sorely lacking in this regard. As a heterosexual, I wouldn't take advantage of the options, but I'd rather see them in the game than not.
***********************************
The above is an explanation of my previous posts, and my views on the topic at hand. My actual position, however, has undergone a slight change. I will explain below.
I've actually done some thinking about this today at work, and you have a point about the non-human romances. However, there has been a history of inter-species romances from the beginning of the series, with Liara, and there is "in game explanation" for why this is. In my mind, therefore, it isn't such a stretch to think that romances between other species, turian/quarian, whatever, can, and probably did, happen. So, Garrus and Tali being opened up to romances didn't set off any "HEY! This is WRONG!" flags in my head. This is merely my opinion, though, and having thought about it at work like I mentioned before, I've come to the conclusion that other people obviously see it differently, and to them, Garrus and Tali being romanceable is no less of a stretch than what I've been calling a rewrite of certain characters is to me.
Thus, I've basically decided this: IF Bioware does decide to make certain squadmates open to same sex relationships, I may not
like it, per se, but I'd accept it
IF it were done the right way. It
must make sense. Period. Simply being open to same sex relationships out of the blue in ME3 still feels like a rewrite, instead of characters developing in a certain direction. It also
must be well done. No dimestore romance novel type dialogue, like there currently is with femshep/Jacob *shudder* The whole thing needs to be believeable. Give me these two conditions, and I'd at least accept it as character progression rather than a rewrite.
Overall, I just want to say that earlier, on my end at least, I felt like the discussion was getting heated, and I don't want that. I don't want hard feelings or anything of the sort, because I
do support same sex romances in the ME series. They should have been there from the beginning. I honestly think there should have been a total of 6 LI's in ME1 that we kept going with in ME2, two homosexual, two bisexual, two heterosexual, each orientation being one of each gender. That way everyone had at least 2 choices, no matter your orientation. But anyways, I'll end this by saying that overall, I
do want what everyone else in this thread wants, I just want it done in a way that makes
sense, not simply wave a magic wand and *POOF!* Kaidan is now bisexual! Is that too much to ask?
Modifié par khevan, 11 mai 2010 - 07:28 .